Efficacy and Toxicity of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Results from the U.S. Expanded-Access Program and Comparisons with Phase 3 VISION Data
Vishnu Murthy, Andrew F. Voter, Kathleen Nguyen, Martin Allen-Auerbach, Lucia Chen, Sydney Caputo, Elisa Ledet, Abraham Akerele, Abuzar Moradi Tuchayi, Courtney Lawhn-Heath, Tingchang Wang, Michael A. Carducci, Martin G. Pomper, Channing J. Paller, Johannes Czernin, Lilja B. Solnes, Thomas A. Hope, Oliver Sartor, Jeremie Calais, Andrei Gafita
{"title":"Efficacy and Toxicity of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Results from the U.S. Expanded-Access Program and Comparisons with Phase 3 VISION Data","authors":"Vishnu Murthy, Andrew F. Voter, Kathleen Nguyen, Martin Allen-Auerbach, Lucia Chen, Sydney Caputo, Elisa Ledet, Abraham Akerele, Abuzar Moradi Tuchayi, Courtney Lawhn-Heath, Tingchang Wang, Michael A. Carducci, Martin G. Pomper, Channing J. Paller, Johannes Czernin, Lilja B. Solnes, Thomas A. Hope, Oliver Sartor, Jeremie Calais, Andrei Gafita","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.267816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The phase 3 VISION trial demonstrated that [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) in prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA]–positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients who progressed on taxane-based chemotherapy and androgen receptor–signaling inhibitors (ARSIs). The U.S. expanded-access program (EAP; NCT04825652) was opened to provide access to [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 for eligible patients until regulatory approval was obtained. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP and compare the results with those from the VISION trial. <strong>Methods:</strong> Patients enrolled in the EAP at 4 institutions in the United States with available toxicity and outcome data were included. Outcome measures included OS, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR) of at least 50%, and incidences of toxicity according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Differences in baseline characteristics, outcome data, and toxicity between the EAP and VISION were evaluated using <em>t</em> testing of proportions and survival analyses. <strong>Results:</strong> In total, 117 patients with mCRPC who received [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP between May 2021 and March 2022 were eligible and included in this analysis. Patients enrolled in the EAP were more heavily pretreated with ARSI (≥2 ARSI regimens: 70% vs. 46%; <em>P</em> < 0.001) and had worse performance status at baseline (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≥ 2: 19% vs. 7%; <em>P</em> < 0.001) than VISION patients. EAP and VISION patients had similar levels of grade 3 or higher anemia (18% vs. 13%; <em>P</em> = 0.15), thrombocytopenia (13% vs. 8%; <em>P</em> = 0.13), and neutropenia (3% vs. 3%; <em>P</em> = 0.85) and similar PSA RRs (42% vs. 46%; <em>P</em> = 0.50) and OS (median: 15.1 vs. 15.3 mo; <em>P</em> > 0.05). <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Patients with PSMA-positive mCRPC who received [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP were later in their disease trajectory than VISION patients. Patients enrolled in the EAP achieved similar PSA RRs and OS and had a safety profile similar to that of the VISION trial patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The phase 3 VISION trial demonstrated that [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) in prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA]–positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients who progressed on taxane-based chemotherapy and androgen receptor–signaling inhibitors (ARSIs). The U.S. expanded-access program (EAP; NCT04825652) was opened to provide access to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 for eligible patients until regulatory approval was obtained. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP and compare the results with those from the VISION trial. Methods: Patients enrolled in the EAP at 4 institutions in the United States with available toxicity and outcome data were included. Outcome measures included OS, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR) of at least 50%, and incidences of toxicity according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Differences in baseline characteristics, outcome data, and toxicity between the EAP and VISION were evaluated using t testing of proportions and survival analyses. Results: In total, 117 patients with mCRPC who received [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP between May 2021 and March 2022 were eligible and included in this analysis. Patients enrolled in the EAP were more heavily pretreated with ARSI (≥2 ARSI regimens: 70% vs. 46%; P < 0.001) and had worse performance status at baseline (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≥ 2: 19% vs. 7%; P < 0.001) than VISION patients. EAP and VISION patients had similar levels of grade 3 or higher anemia (18% vs. 13%; P = 0.15), thrombocytopenia (13% vs. 8%; P = 0.13), and neutropenia (3% vs. 3%; P = 0.85) and similar PSA RRs (42% vs. 46%; P = 0.50) and OS (median: 15.1 vs. 15.3 mo; P > 0.05). Conclusion: Patients with PSMA-positive mCRPC who received [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP were later in their disease trajectory than VISION patients. Patients enrolled in the EAP achieved similar PSA RRs and OS and had a safety profile similar to that of the VISION trial patients.