What's the story of the elephant? Evaluation of choose-your-own-adventure activities on public perception of human–elephant conflict 与亚洲象的故事?关于人象冲突公众观感的CYOA的评估

Cedric Kai Wei Tan, Yen Yi Loo, Aina Amyrah Ahmad Husam, Adeline Hii, Ee Phin Wong
{"title":"What's the story of the elephant? Evaluation of choose-your-own-adventure activities on public perception of human–elephant conflict\n 与亚洲象的故事?关于人象冲突公众观感的CYOA的评估","authors":"Cedric Kai Wei Tan,&nbsp;Yen Yi Loo,&nbsp;Aina Amyrah Ahmad Husam,&nbsp;Adeline Hii,&nbsp;Ee Phin Wong","doi":"10.1002/inc3.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Choose-your-own-adventure (CYOA) narratives offer immersive experiences that can effectively convey complex conservation concepts, fostering empathy and critical thinking, particularly in addressing issues like human–elephant conflict. Despite their potential, there is limited research on the use of CYOA activities in conservation education. In this study, we created an interactive story centered on elephant conservation, drawing from existing research to distill scientific concepts into engaging narratives and utilizing various modes of delivery (YouTube and live performances) to reach diverse audiences. We conducted postactivity surveys to assess variations in audience perception, learning, and conservation engagement intentions in relation to sociodemographic factors, activity type, and messages encountered. We then modeled the relationships between ordinal responses and explanatory variables using cumulative ordinal mixed models (<i>N</i> = 398). For the YouTube version, we also considered sociodemographic factors (YouTube <i>n</i> = 53, non-YouTube <i>n</i> = 47). Our findings indicate a preference for live performances over online YouTube activity, with participants gaining knowledge about elephant conservation from both formats. For the YouTube activity, participants strongly agreed that the activity allowed engagement with the character and topic. They also expressed a higher likelihood of participating in several conservation actions, relative to a control group. While CYOA storytelling shows promise for conservation education, challenges remain in simplifying scientific language, assessing its impact on comprehension of complex issues, standardizing outcomes, and effectively communicating knowledge. Further research is recommended to adapt this approach, making it applicable to various audiences and domains beyond conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":100680,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Conservation","volume":"3 3","pages":"212-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/inc3.64","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/inc3.64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Choose-your-own-adventure (CYOA) narratives offer immersive experiences that can effectively convey complex conservation concepts, fostering empathy and critical thinking, particularly in addressing issues like human–elephant conflict. Despite their potential, there is limited research on the use of CYOA activities in conservation education. In this study, we created an interactive story centered on elephant conservation, drawing from existing research to distill scientific concepts into engaging narratives and utilizing various modes of delivery (YouTube and live performances) to reach diverse audiences. We conducted postactivity surveys to assess variations in audience perception, learning, and conservation engagement intentions in relation to sociodemographic factors, activity type, and messages encountered. We then modeled the relationships between ordinal responses and explanatory variables using cumulative ordinal mixed models (N = 398). For the YouTube version, we also considered sociodemographic factors (YouTube n = 53, non-YouTube n = 47). Our findings indicate a preference for live performances over online YouTube activity, with participants gaining knowledge about elephant conservation from both formats. For the YouTube activity, participants strongly agreed that the activity allowed engagement with the character and topic. They also expressed a higher likelihood of participating in several conservation actions, relative to a control group. While CYOA storytelling shows promise for conservation education, challenges remain in simplifying scientific language, assessing its impact on comprehension of complex issues, standardizing outcomes, and effectively communicating knowledge. Further research is recommended to adapt this approach, making it applicable to various audiences and domains beyond conservation.

Abstract Image

大象的故事是什么?关于人象冲突公众观感的CYOA评估
自选冒险(CYOA)叙事提供了身临其境的体验,可以有效传达复杂的保护概念,培养同理心和批判性思维,尤其是在解决人象冲突等问题时。尽管 CYOA 活动具有潜力,但有关其在保护教育中应用的研究却十分有限。在这项研究中,我们以大象保护为中心创作了一个互动故事,借鉴现有研究成果,将科学概念提炼为引人入胜的叙事,并利用各种传播方式(YouTube 和现场表演)向不同受众传播。我们进行了活动后调查,以评估受众的感知、学习和保护参与意愿与社会人口因素、活动类型和遇到的信息之间的关系。然后,我们使用累积序数混合模型对序数反应和解释变量之间的关系进行了建模(N = 398)。对于 YouTube 版本,我们还考虑了社会人口因素(YouTube n = 53,非 YouTube n = 47)。我们的研究结果表明,与在线 YouTube 活动相比,参与者更倾向于现场表演,他们从两种形式中都获得了有关大象保护的知识。对于 YouTube 活动,参与者非常认同该活动能够让他们参与到角色和主题中。与对照组相比,他们还表示更有可能参与一些保护行动。虽然 CYOA 讲故事为保护教育带来了希望,但在简化科学语言、评估其对理解复杂问题的影响、标准化结果以及有效传播知识方面仍存在挑战。建议进一步开展研究,对这种方法进行调整,使其适用于各种受众和保护以外的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信