{"title":"Synergistic Utilization of Spaceborne SAR Observations for Monitoring the Baltic Sea Flow Through the Danish Straits","authors":"Anis Elyouncha, Göran Broström, Harald Johnsen","doi":"10.1029/2024EA003794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has emerged as a key instrument in oceanography due to its high spatial resolution and sensitivity to ocean surface dynamics. The main limitation of a single spaceborne SAR is the long repeat cycle (e.g., 12 days for Sentinel-1), which hinders its capability to monitor the temporal evolution of oceanic processes. The principal objective of this study is to demonstrate the potential of spaceborne SAR to monitor the temporal variation of ocean surface circulation. This is assessed using the Baltic Sea flow through the Danish strait Fehmarn Belt as a case study. In order to overcome the temporal sampling limitation, data from three satellites are combined, namely Sentinel-1A, Sentinel-1B and TanDEM-X. The average revisit time achieved by combining the three satellites is 1.2 days. Two months of opportunistic SAR data (June and July 2020) covering the Fehmarn Belt are used. The radial surface current derived from SAR is compared to ocean model and in situ data. It is shown that the dominant processes that govern the circulation in the Fehmarn Belt exhibit time scales larger than 2 days. Subsequently, it is demonstrated that SAR effectively captures the synoptic-scale features (time scales larger than 2 days) of the Baltic Sea circulation, thereby enabling monitoring the temporal variations of flow dynamics. Comparison of the SAR-derived radial surface current against in situ measurements yields comparable bias (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>≤</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\le} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>0.08 m/s) and correlation coefficient (R <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>≈</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\approx} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 0.75) but lower standard deviations and rms errors (0.15 m/s) than those exhibited by the ocean model (0.31 m/s).</p>","PeriodicalId":54286,"journal":{"name":"Earth and Space Science","volume":"11 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EA003794","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EA003794","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has emerged as a key instrument in oceanography due to its high spatial resolution and sensitivity to ocean surface dynamics. The main limitation of a single spaceborne SAR is the long repeat cycle (e.g., 12 days for Sentinel-1), which hinders its capability to monitor the temporal evolution of oceanic processes. The principal objective of this study is to demonstrate the potential of spaceborne SAR to monitor the temporal variation of ocean surface circulation. This is assessed using the Baltic Sea flow through the Danish strait Fehmarn Belt as a case study. In order to overcome the temporal sampling limitation, data from three satellites are combined, namely Sentinel-1A, Sentinel-1B and TanDEM-X. The average revisit time achieved by combining the three satellites is 1.2 days. Two months of opportunistic SAR data (June and July 2020) covering the Fehmarn Belt are used. The radial surface current derived from SAR is compared to ocean model and in situ data. It is shown that the dominant processes that govern the circulation in the Fehmarn Belt exhibit time scales larger than 2 days. Subsequently, it is demonstrated that SAR effectively captures the synoptic-scale features (time scales larger than 2 days) of the Baltic Sea circulation, thereby enabling monitoring the temporal variations of flow dynamics. Comparison of the SAR-derived radial surface current against in situ measurements yields comparable bias (0.08 m/s) and correlation coefficient (R 0.75) but lower standard deviations and rms errors (0.15 m/s) than those exhibited by the ocean model (0.31 m/s).
期刊介绍:
Marking AGU’s second new open access journal in the last 12 months, Earth and Space Science is the only journal that reflects the expansive range of science represented by AGU’s 62,000 members, including all of the Earth, planetary, and space sciences, and related fields in environmental science, geoengineering, space engineering, and biogeochemistry.