Dose‒response effects of resistance exercise on ameliorating cravings and executive functions in individuals with methamphetamine use disorders

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Jianjing Jin , Xiaohui Zhai , Adrian Taylor , Ting Zhu , Dongshi Wang , Bo Peng , Ke Wang
{"title":"Dose‒response effects of resistance exercise on ameliorating cravings and executive functions in individuals with methamphetamine use disorders","authors":"Jianjing Jin ,&nbsp;Xiaohui Zhai ,&nbsp;Adrian Taylor ,&nbsp;Ting Zhu ,&nbsp;Dongshi Wang ,&nbsp;Bo Peng ,&nbsp;Ke Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.mhpa.2024.100633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Resistance exercise (RE) can acutely benefit symptoms in individuals with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD), though the optimal dose has not yet been established. We aimed to determine the dose response relationship between RE intensity and cue-elicited cravings and executive functions in individuals with MUD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 128 male participants with MUD (34.73 ± 5.65) were randomly assigned to the low-intensity (30%–35%1-RM) RE group (LREG), moderate-intensity (55%–60%1-RM) RE group (MREG), high-intensity (75%–80%1-RM) RE group (HREG), or control group (CONG). Cravings based on the cue-reactivity paradigm were measured before, immediately after, and 40 min after acute RE, and inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility were measured before and after acute RE.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Immediately after and 40 min after RE, the Δcue-elicited cravings of the MREG from baseline was significantly more negative than that of the LREG and CONG. Trend analyses revealed a U-shaped dose‒response curve for RE intensity and Δcue-elicited cravings, indicating that moderate-intensity RE had the greatest ameliorating effect on cue-elicited cravings. Δinhibitory control and Δworking memory scores increased only in the MREG, and Δcognitive flexibility scores significantly increased in all RE groups. Trend analyses revealed a cubic curvilinear relationship between RE intensity and inhibitory control and a quadratic curvilinear relationship with working memory and cognitive flexibility.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>RE proved effective in diminishing cue-elicited cravings and enhancing executive functions. A significant dose‒response relationship existed among RE intensity, cue-elicited cravings and executive function, and moderate-intensity RE had a more pronounced ameliorative effect on individuals with MUD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755296624000590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Resistance exercise (RE) can acutely benefit symptoms in individuals with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD), though the optimal dose has not yet been established. We aimed to determine the dose response relationship between RE intensity and cue-elicited cravings and executive functions in individuals with MUD.

Methods

A total of 128 male participants with MUD (34.73 ± 5.65) were randomly assigned to the low-intensity (30%–35%1-RM) RE group (LREG), moderate-intensity (55%–60%1-RM) RE group (MREG), high-intensity (75%–80%1-RM) RE group (HREG), or control group (CONG). Cravings based on the cue-reactivity paradigm were measured before, immediately after, and 40 min after acute RE, and inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility were measured before and after acute RE.

Results

Immediately after and 40 min after RE, the Δcue-elicited cravings of the MREG from baseline was significantly more negative than that of the LREG and CONG. Trend analyses revealed a U-shaped dose‒response curve for RE intensity and Δcue-elicited cravings, indicating that moderate-intensity RE had the greatest ameliorating effect on cue-elicited cravings. Δinhibitory control and Δworking memory scores increased only in the MREG, and Δcognitive flexibility scores significantly increased in all RE groups. Trend analyses revealed a cubic curvilinear relationship between RE intensity and inhibitory control and a quadratic curvilinear relationship with working memory and cognitive flexibility.

Conclusion

RE proved effective in diminishing cue-elicited cravings and enhancing executive functions. A significant dose‒response relationship existed among RE intensity, cue-elicited cravings and executive function, and moderate-intensity RE had a more pronounced ameliorative effect on individuals with MUD.
阻力运动对改善甲基苯丙胺使用障碍者的渴求和执行功能的剂量反应效应
目的抵抗运动(RE)可迅速改善甲基苯丙胺使用障碍(MUD)患者的症状,但最佳剂量尚未确定。方法将128名男性MUD参与者(34.73 ± 5.65)随机分配到低强度(30%-35%1-RM)RE组(LREG)、中等强度(55%-60%1-RM)RE组(MREG)、高强度(75%-80%1-RM)RE组(HREG)或对照组(CONG)。在急性 RE 之前、之后和之后 40 分钟测量了基于线索反应范式的渴求度,并在急性 RE 之前和之后测量了抑制控制、工作记忆和认知灵活性。趋势分析显示,RE强度和Δ线索诱发的渴求度呈U形剂量反应曲线,表明中等强度的RE对线索诱发的渴求度具有最大的改善作用。Δ抑制控制和Δ工作记忆得分仅在MREG中有所提高,而Δ认知灵活性得分在所有RE组中都有显著提高。趋势分析表明,RE 强度与抑制控制之间存在立方曲线关系,与工作记忆和认知灵活性之间存在二次曲线关系。RE 强度、线索诱发的渴求和执行功能之间存在明显的剂量-反应关系,中等强度的 RE 对 MUD 患者有更明显的改善作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信