How good am I? Effects and mechanisms behind salient rank

IF 2.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Rigissa Megalokonomou , Yi Zhang
{"title":"How good am I? Effects and mechanisms behind salient rank","authors":"Rigissa Megalokonomou ,&nbsp;Yi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How do individuals respond when their ordinal ranking becomes salient? We present evidence on the effects and mechanisms of achievement rank effects in middle schools when ranks are to a large extent salient to students and their parents. For identification, we rely on the random assignment of students (and teachers) to classrooms in China. That is, students with the same baseline test scores end up having different achievement ranks in their assigned classroom. We find positive and large effects of being assigned a higher rank on subsequent performance. The estimated effects of ranks are larger when ranks are more salient and for male students. We show that students with higher ranks spend more hours on autonomic studying. What drives these effects is still an open question, especially when ranks are salient to both students and their parents. Using rich survey data, we show that these academic gains are not only mediated through (1) students’ higher self-perception and higher subject learning confidence, but also through (2) better parental understanding of their child’s ranks, stricter parental requirements for their child’s study, and higher parental expectations regarding their child’s educational attainment and career prospects. We show that these two channels make similar contributions to explaining salient rank effects, and when combined they explain 47.70% of the increase in test scores. We find no impact on teachers’ investment or attention to students as a result of rank effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292124001995","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do individuals respond when their ordinal ranking becomes salient? We present evidence on the effects and mechanisms of achievement rank effects in middle schools when ranks are to a large extent salient to students and their parents. For identification, we rely on the random assignment of students (and teachers) to classrooms in China. That is, students with the same baseline test scores end up having different achievement ranks in their assigned classroom. We find positive and large effects of being assigned a higher rank on subsequent performance. The estimated effects of ranks are larger when ranks are more salient and for male students. We show that students with higher ranks spend more hours on autonomic studying. What drives these effects is still an open question, especially when ranks are salient to both students and their parents. Using rich survey data, we show that these academic gains are not only mediated through (1) students’ higher self-perception and higher subject learning confidence, but also through (2) better parental understanding of their child’s ranks, stricter parental requirements for their child’s study, and higher parental expectations regarding their child’s educational attainment and career prospects. We show that these two channels make similar contributions to explaining salient rank effects, and when combined they explain 47.70% of the increase in test scores. We find no impact on teachers’ investment or attention to students as a result of rank effects.
我有多优秀?突出排名背后的效应和机制
当个人的顺序排名变得突出时,他们会做出怎样的反应?当学生及其家长在很大程度上关注成绩排名时,我们就中学成绩排名效应的影响和机制提供了证据。为了进行识别,我们在中国将学生(和教师)随机分配到班级。也就是说,基线考试成绩相同的学生在分配到的班级中最终会有不同的成绩排名。我们发现,被分配到较高年级的学生对其后的成绩有很大的正向影响。当等级更突出和对男生而言时,等级的估计效应更大。我们的研究表明,排名靠前的学生在自主学习上花费的时间更多。这些影响的驱动因素仍然是一个未决问题,尤其是当名次对学生和家长都很重要时。利用丰富的调查数据,我们表明,这些学业成绩的提高不仅通过(1)学生更高的自我认知和更高的学科学习信心,还通过(2)家长对子女排名的更好理解、家长对子女学习的更严格要求,以及家长对子女的教育成就和职业前景的更高期望。我们的研究表明,这两个渠道对解释突出的名次效应做出了相似的贡献,当它们结合在一起时,可以解释 47.70% 的考试成绩增长。我们没有发现等级效应会影响教师对学生的投资或关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: The European Economic Review (EER) started publishing in 1969 as the first research journal specifically aiming to contribute to the development and application of economics as a science in Europe. As a broad-based professional and international journal, the EER welcomes submissions of applied and theoretical research papers in all fields of economics. The aim of the EER is to contribute to the development of the science of economics and its applications, as well as to improve communication between academic researchers, teachers and policy makers across the European continent and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信