Environmental Regulations-Enabled External Knowledge Acquisition and Proactive Environmental Strategy: The Moderating Effect of Social Media Capability

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Xiaocui Li;Nengmin Wang;Bin Jiang;Tao Jia
{"title":"Environmental Regulations-Enabled External Knowledge Acquisition and Proactive Environmental Strategy: The Moderating Effect of Social Media Capability","authors":"Xiaocui Li;Nengmin Wang;Bin Jiang;Tao Jia","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2024.3454775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A proactive environmental strategy (PES) serves as an impactful and effective way to alleviate a firm's adverse environmental impact, and environmental regulations are widely recognized as primary and crucial for promoting a PES. However, most studies in the PES field overlook the pivotal role of external knowledge acquisition and social media capability. Therefore, we have developed a theoretical model drawing on institutional and resource-dependent theories to address this gap. This model examines how different types of environmental regulations, such as market-based incentive regulation (MBI) and command-and-control regulation (CAC), enabled external knowledge acquisition on PES and how social media capability moderates these relationships. We conducted a survey involving 385 Chinese manufacturing firms and follow-up interviews with top managers to test our model. The findings indicate that MBI and CAC positively influence a firm's external knowledge acquisition for PES. However, it is worth noting that MBI exhibits a more substantial effect than CAC. Furthermore, the influence of social media capability on external knowledge acquisition varies depending on the specific dimension of environmental regulations under consideration. These results hold significant implications for organizations aiming to leverage diverse types of environmental regulations and harness the power of social media capability to bolster their proactive environmental strategies. Finally, given the varying levels of development and economic conditions across China, and the fact that these differences will change over time, future research should consider conducting comparative studies to understand PES at a regional level, by using more empirical methods, such as longitudinal research designs and case studies.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10666780/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A proactive environmental strategy (PES) serves as an impactful and effective way to alleviate a firm's adverse environmental impact, and environmental regulations are widely recognized as primary and crucial for promoting a PES. However, most studies in the PES field overlook the pivotal role of external knowledge acquisition and social media capability. Therefore, we have developed a theoretical model drawing on institutional and resource-dependent theories to address this gap. This model examines how different types of environmental regulations, such as market-based incentive regulation (MBI) and command-and-control regulation (CAC), enabled external knowledge acquisition on PES and how social media capability moderates these relationships. We conducted a survey involving 385 Chinese manufacturing firms and follow-up interviews with top managers to test our model. The findings indicate that MBI and CAC positively influence a firm's external knowledge acquisition for PES. However, it is worth noting that MBI exhibits a more substantial effect than CAC. Furthermore, the influence of social media capability on external knowledge acquisition varies depending on the specific dimension of environmental regulations under consideration. These results hold significant implications for organizations aiming to leverage diverse types of environmental regulations and harness the power of social media capability to bolster their proactive environmental strategies. Finally, given the varying levels of development and economic conditions across China, and the fact that these differences will change over time, future research should consider conducting comparative studies to understand PES at a regional level, by using more empirical methods, such as longitudinal research designs and case studies.
环境法规驱动的外部知识获取与积极主动的环境战略:社交媒体能力的调节效应
积极主动的环境战略(PES)是减轻企业对环境不利影响的一种有影响力的有效方法,而环境法规被广泛认为是促进积极主动的环境战略的首要和关键。然而,主动环境战略领域的大多数研究都忽视了外部知识获取和社交媒体能力的关键作用。因此,我们借鉴制度和资源依赖理论,建立了一个理论模型来弥补这一不足。该模型研究了不同类型的环境法规,如基于市场的激励性法规(MBI)和命令与控制法规(CAC),如何促进环境绩效评估的外部知识获取,以及社交媒体能力如何调节这些关系。我们对 385 家中国制造企业进行了调查,并对高层管理人员进行了后续访谈,以检验我们的模型。研究结果表明,MBI 和 CAC 对企业获取 PES 外部知识有积极影响。但值得注意的是,MBI 比 CAC 的影响更大。此外,社交媒体能力对外部知识获取的影响因环境法规的具体维度而异。这些结果对于那些旨在利用各种类型的环境法规和社交媒体能力来加强其前瞻性环境战略的组织具有重要意义。最后,鉴于中国各地的发展水平和经济条件各不相同,而且这些差异会随着时间的推移而发生变化,未来的研究应考虑开展比较研究,通过使用更多的实证方法(如纵向研究设计和案例研究)来了解区域层面的生态系统服务补偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信