A mathematical formulation of learner cognition for personalised learning experiences

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
{"title":"A mathematical formulation of learner cognition for personalised learning experiences","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cogsys.2024.101283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The paper focuses on the assessment of cognitive skills within Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs). In response to the global shift to remote learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic, VLEs, which include learning management systems (LMS) and online collaboration platforms, gained prominence. The proposed work leverages an established Cattell–Horn–Carroll (CHC) theory to propose eight metrics, which collectively form a part of Cognitive Evaluation Metrics (CEM). The proposed metrics introduce a novel computational approach for multimode evaluation of learners’ cognitive abilities for each learning task within a learning environment. The paper details the formalism for the evaluation of the metrics and makes a contribution towards the potential of the proposed methodology to evaluate cognitive abilities. Additionally, the work implements CEM integration into the learner module of a Game-Based Learning (GBL) environment. Analysis of simulations in the GBL environment, along with statistical analysis, provides insights into the normal distribution of cognitive metrics. This reveals diverse ranges in various abilities such as long or short term memory, working memory, reasoning, attention, and processing speed. The paper also explores the impact of virtual assistants, which highlights their limited relevance to enhance cognitive abilities but serve as valuable on-demand support resources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55242,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Systems Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041724000779","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper focuses on the assessment of cognitive skills within Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs). In response to the global shift to remote learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic, VLEs, which include learning management systems (LMS) and online collaboration platforms, gained prominence. The proposed work leverages an established Cattell–Horn–Carroll (CHC) theory to propose eight metrics, which collectively form a part of Cognitive Evaluation Metrics (CEM). The proposed metrics introduce a novel computational approach for multimode evaluation of learners’ cognitive abilities for each learning task within a learning environment. The paper details the formalism for the evaluation of the metrics and makes a contribution towards the potential of the proposed methodology to evaluate cognitive abilities. Additionally, the work implements CEM integration into the learner module of a Game-Based Learning (GBL) environment. Analysis of simulations in the GBL environment, along with statistical analysis, provides insights into the normal distribution of cognitive metrics. This reveals diverse ranges in various abilities such as long or short term memory, working memory, reasoning, attention, and processing speed. The paper also explores the impact of virtual assistants, which highlights their limited relevance to enhance cognitive abilities but serve as valuable on-demand support resources.
个性化学习体验的学习者认知数学表述
本文重点讨论虚拟学习环境(VLE)中的认知技能评估。为应对 COVID-19 大流行导致的全球向远程学习的转变,包括学习管理系统(LMS)和在线协作平台在内的虚拟学习环境日益受到重视。本研究利用已有的卡泰尔-霍恩-卡罗尔(CHC)理论提出了八个指标,它们共同构成了认知评价指标(CEM)的一部分。所提出的指标引入了一种新颖的计算方法,用于对学习者在学习环境中完成每项学习任务的认知能力进行多模式评估。论文详细介绍了评价指标的形式主义,并对所提出的认知能力评价方法的潜力做出了贡献。此外,论文还将 CEM 集成到了基于游戏的学习(GBL)环境的学习者模块中。通过对 GBL 环境中的模拟分析以及统计分析,可以深入了解认知指标的正态分布。这揭示了长短期记忆、工作记忆、推理、注意力和处理速度等各种能力的不同范围。论文还探讨了虚拟助手的影响,强调虚拟助手对提高认知能力的作用有限,但可作为宝贵的按需支持资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Systems Research
Cognitive Systems Research 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Systems Research is dedicated to the study of human-level cognition. As such, it welcomes papers which advance the understanding, design and applications of cognitive and intelligent systems, both natural and artificial. The journal brings together a broad community studying cognition in its many facets in vivo and in silico, across the developmental spectrum, focusing on individual capacities or on entire architectures. It aims to foster debate and integrate ideas, concepts, constructs, theories, models and techniques from across different disciplines and different perspectives on human-level cognition. The scope of interest includes the study of cognitive capacities and architectures - both brain-inspired and non-brain-inspired - and the application of cognitive systems to real-world problems as far as it offers insights relevant for the understanding of cognition. Cognitive Systems Research therefore welcomes mature and cutting-edge research approaching cognition from a systems-oriented perspective, both theoretical and empirically-informed, in the form of original manuscripts, short communications, opinion articles, systematic reviews, and topical survey articles from the fields of Cognitive Science (including Philosophy of Cognitive Science), Artificial Intelligence/Computer Science, Cognitive Robotics, Developmental Science, Psychology, and Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Engineering. Empirical studies will be considered if they are supplemented by theoretical analyses and contributions to theory development and/or computational modelling studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信