What drives urban low-carbon transition? Findings from China

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Zhuhong Gao, Peng Zhou, Wen Wen
{"title":"What drives urban low-carbon transition? Findings from China","authors":"Zhuhong Gao,&nbsp;Peng Zhou,&nbsp;Wen Wen","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper assesses the city-level performance of low-carbon transition and the contributions of individual attributes to the percentage change of urban low-carbon transition performance. We developed a composite index to evaluate the status quo of low-carbon development and constructed an adjacent Malmquist index to measure the low-carbon transition performance. Then we grafted attribution analysis approach onto the Malmquist index to quantify attributions and applied convergence analysis to reveal characteristics of urban low-carbon transition. We applied the models to the case of 114 Chinese cities over time and found that the performance of urban low-carbon transition had progressed over time. Interestingly, we observed that the top performers were mainly non-pilot cities, even though pilot cities had performed better on average. Attribution analysis showed high heterogeneity over time for both types of cities, but in general, the intensity of technological innovation investment, the level of low-carbon policy system perfection and green space carbon sink were the main drivers. Convergence analysis showed that most cities had moved closer to the frontier of best practice over time and fewer cities were lagging behind their peers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107679"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019592552400266X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper assesses the city-level performance of low-carbon transition and the contributions of individual attributes to the percentage change of urban low-carbon transition performance. We developed a composite index to evaluate the status quo of low-carbon development and constructed an adjacent Malmquist index to measure the low-carbon transition performance. Then we grafted attribution analysis approach onto the Malmquist index to quantify attributions and applied convergence analysis to reveal characteristics of urban low-carbon transition. We applied the models to the case of 114 Chinese cities over time and found that the performance of urban low-carbon transition had progressed over time. Interestingly, we observed that the top performers were mainly non-pilot cities, even though pilot cities had performed better on average. Attribution analysis showed high heterogeneity over time for both types of cities, but in general, the intensity of technological innovation investment, the level of low-carbon policy system perfection and green space carbon sink were the main drivers. Convergence analysis showed that most cities had moved closer to the frontier of best practice over time and fewer cities were lagging behind their peers.
是什么推动了城市的低碳转型?中国的研究结果
本文评估了城市层面的低碳转型绩效,以及个体属性对城市低碳转型绩效百分比变化的贡献。我们开发了一个综合指数来评估低碳发展现状,并构建了一个相邻的 Malmquist 指数来衡量低碳转型绩效。然后,我们将归因分析方法嫁接到 Malmquist 指数中以量化归因,并应用收敛分析揭示城市低碳转型的特征。我们将这些模型应用于中国 114 个城市,发现城市低碳转型的绩效随着时间的推移不断提高。有趣的是,我们发现,尽管试点城市的平均表现更好,但表现最好的主要是非试点城市。归因分析表明,随着时间的推移,两类城市的异质性都很高,但总体而言,技术创新投资强度、低碳政策体系完善程度和绿地碳汇是主要驱动因素。趋同分析表明,随着时间的推移,大多数城市都更接近最佳实践的前沿,落后于同行的城市数量较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信