Does climate-smart agriculture technology improve farmers' subjective well-being? Micro-level evidence from Odisha, India

Dukhabandhu Sahoo , Pritisudha Mohanty , Surbhi Mishra , Manash Kumar Behera , Souryabrata Mohapatra
{"title":"Does climate-smart agriculture technology improve farmers' subjective well-being? Micro-level evidence from Odisha, India","authors":"Dukhabandhu Sahoo ,&nbsp;Pritisudha Mohanty ,&nbsp;Surbhi Mishra ,&nbsp;Manash Kumar Behera ,&nbsp;Souryabrata Mohapatra","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2024.100124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since the global population is expected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050, food production must increase by 70% in the next 30 years to provide food security in the face of climate change. Implementing climate-smart agriculture technology (CSAT) is essential for ensuring food security and promoting economic growth in the context of sustainable agriculture. Climate change and weather patterns significantly affect agricultural yield, necessitating the implementation of more efficient, productive, and climate-resilient techniques. However, the use of CSAT is a behavioural decision that affects the subjective well-being of the users. Using smart agricultural practices reduces climate change's impact on agricultural productivity and promotes sustainable agriculture, improving adopters' welfare. This study examines how the use of CSAT affects rural households' subjective well-being in Odisha, India. The result of the study shows that the use of CSAT significantly affects the subjective well-being of the farmers. The measured impact is 0.149, 0.181, and 0.144 for farmers whose intensity is 0.251–0.500, 0.501–0.750, and 0.751 and above, respectively, as compared to farmers whose intensity is 0.0–0.250. This implies greater satisfaction for farmers who engage in the moderate use of CSAT practices. Low utilization of technology may not yield benefits for farmers, while the adoption of advanced technology may not be economically viable. Additionally, CSAT is not easily available to households residing in low-lying areas, preventing them from improving their well-being. Only a small number of landowners in impoverished areas utilize CSAT. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate government regulations regarding land and tenancy as well as develop measures for farmers to adapt to new technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farming System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911924000546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the global population is expected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050, food production must increase by 70% in the next 30 years to provide food security in the face of climate change. Implementing climate-smart agriculture technology (CSAT) is essential for ensuring food security and promoting economic growth in the context of sustainable agriculture. Climate change and weather patterns significantly affect agricultural yield, necessitating the implementation of more efficient, productive, and climate-resilient techniques. However, the use of CSAT is a behavioural decision that affects the subjective well-being of the users. Using smart agricultural practices reduces climate change's impact on agricultural productivity and promotes sustainable agriculture, improving adopters' welfare. This study examines how the use of CSAT affects rural households' subjective well-being in Odisha, India. The result of the study shows that the use of CSAT significantly affects the subjective well-being of the farmers. The measured impact is 0.149, 0.181, and 0.144 for farmers whose intensity is 0.251–0.500, 0.501–0.750, and 0.751 and above, respectively, as compared to farmers whose intensity is 0.0–0.250. This implies greater satisfaction for farmers who engage in the moderate use of CSAT practices. Low utilization of technology may not yield benefits for farmers, while the adoption of advanced technology may not be economically viable. Additionally, CSAT is not easily available to households residing in low-lying areas, preventing them from improving their well-being. Only a small number of landowners in impoverished areas utilize CSAT. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate government regulations regarding land and tenancy as well as develop measures for farmers to adapt to new technologies.
气候智能型农业技术能否改善农民的主观幸福感?印度奥迪沙的微观证据
预计到 2050 年,全球人口将达到 97 亿,因此未来 30 年粮食产量必须增加 70%,才能在气候变化的情况下保障粮食安全。在可持续农业的背景下,实施气候智能型农业技术(CSAT)对于确保粮食安全和促进经济增长至关重要。气候变化和天气模式会严重影响农业产量,因此有必要采用更高效、高产和气候适应性更强的技术。然而,使用 CSAT 是一种行为决策,会影响用户的主观幸福感。使用智能农业实践可减少气候变化对农业生产率的影响,促进可持续农业发展,改善采用者的福利。本研究探讨了使用 CSAT 如何影响印度奥迪沙邦农村家庭的主观幸福感。研究结果表明,使用 CSAT 对农民的主观幸福感有显著影响。与强度为 0.0-0.250 的农民相比,强度为 0.251-0.500、0.501-0.750 和 0.751 及以上的农民的测量影响分别为 0.149、0.181 和 0.144。这意味着,适度使用 CSAT 实践的农民的满意度更高。技术利用率低可能不会给农民带来收益,而采用先进技术可能在经济上不可行。此外,居住在低洼地区的农户不容易获得 CSAT,这阻碍了他们改善生活。只有少数贫困地区的土地所有者使用 CSAT。因此,有必要对政府有关土地和租赁的法规进行评估,并为农民制定适应新技术的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信