Development of a Monte Carlo simulation platform for the systematic evaluation of photon-counting detector-based micro-CT

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Development of a Monte Carlo simulation platform for the systematic evaluation of photon-counting detector-based micro-CT","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to develop a photon-counting detector (PCD) based micro-CT simulation platform for assessing the performance of three different PCD sensor materials: cadmium telluride (CdTe), gallium arsenide (GaAs), and silicon (Si). The evaluation encompasses the components of primary and scatter signals, performance of imaging contrast agents, and detector efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Simulations were performed using the Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit, and a micro-PCD-CT system was meticulously modeled based on realistic geometric parameters. Results.</div><div>The simulation can obtain HU values consistent with measured results for iodine and calcium hydroxyapatite contrast agents. The two major components of scatter signals for CdTe and GaAs based PCD are fluorescent X-ray photons and photoelectrons, whereas for Si, the components are photoelectrons and Compton electrons. Scattering counts of CdTe and GaAs sensors can be effectively reduced by using energy thresholds, whereas those of Si sensor are insensitive to the applied threshold. The optimal threshold values for CdTe and GaAs are 30 and 15 keV, respectively. For contrast agent imaging, GaAs exhibits enhanced sensitivity to low photon energies compared to CdTe, while it’s contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values are slightly lower than those of CdTe at the same contrast agent concentration. Among the three sensor materials, Si has the lowest CNR and detector efficiency; CdTe exhibits the highest efficiency, except in low-energy ranges (&lt; 45 keV), where GaAs has superior efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The proposed methods are expected to benefit PCD optimization and applications, including energy threshold selection, scattering correction, and may reduce the need for large-scale experiments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179724010810","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to develop a photon-counting detector (PCD) based micro-CT simulation platform for assessing the performance of three different PCD sensor materials: cadmium telluride (CdTe), gallium arsenide (GaAs), and silicon (Si). The evaluation encompasses the components of primary and scatter signals, performance of imaging contrast agents, and detector efficiency.

Methods

Simulations were performed using the Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit, and a micro-PCD-CT system was meticulously modeled based on realistic geometric parameters. Results.
The simulation can obtain HU values consistent with measured results for iodine and calcium hydroxyapatite contrast agents. The two major components of scatter signals for CdTe and GaAs based PCD are fluorescent X-ray photons and photoelectrons, whereas for Si, the components are photoelectrons and Compton electrons. Scattering counts of CdTe and GaAs sensors can be effectively reduced by using energy thresholds, whereas those of Si sensor are insensitive to the applied threshold. The optimal threshold values for CdTe and GaAs are 30 and 15 keV, respectively. For contrast agent imaging, GaAs exhibits enhanced sensitivity to low photon energies compared to CdTe, while it’s contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values are slightly lower than those of CdTe at the same contrast agent concentration. Among the three sensor materials, Si has the lowest CNR and detector efficiency; CdTe exhibits the highest efficiency, except in low-energy ranges (< 45 keV), where GaAs has superior efficiency.

Conclusions

The proposed methods are expected to benefit PCD optimization and applications, including energy threshold selection, scattering correction, and may reduce the need for large-scale experiments.
开发蒙特卡洛模拟平台,用于系统评估基于光子计数探测器的微型计算机断层显微技术
目的 本研究旨在开发一个基于光子计数探测器(PCD)的微型计算机断层扫描模拟平台,用于评估三种不同的PCD传感器材料:碲化镉(CdTe)、砷化镓(GaAs)和硅(Si)的性能。评估内容包括主信号和散射信号的成分、成像造影剂的性能以及探测器的效率。方法:使用 Geant4 Monte Carlo 工具包进行模拟,并根据现实的几何参数对微型 PCD-CT 系统进行了细致的建模。结果:模拟可获得与碘和羟基磷灰石钙造影剂测量结果一致的 HU 值。基于碲化镉和砷化镓的 PCD 散射信号的两个主要成分是荧光 X 射线光子和光电子,而对于硅,其成分是光电子和康普顿电子。使用能量阈值可以有效减少碲化镉和砷化镓传感器的散射计数,而硅传感器的散射计数对所使用的阈值不敏感。碲化镉和砷化镓的最佳阈值分别为 30 和 15 千伏。在造影剂成像方面,与碲化镉相比,砷化镓对低光子能量的灵敏度更高,但在相同的造影剂浓度下,其对比度-噪声比(CNR)值略低于碲化镉。在三种传感器材料中,硅的 CNR 和探测器效率最低;碲化镉的效率最高,但在低能量范围(45 keV)内,砷化镓的效率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信