A data envelopment analysis model for optimizing transfer time of ischemic stroke patients under endovascular thrombectomy

{"title":"A data envelopment analysis model for optimizing transfer time of ischemic stroke patients under endovascular thrombectomy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.health.2024.100364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study applies Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to optimize transfer times and futile transfers of eligible ischemic stroke patients receiving Endovascular Thrombosis (EVT) in Primary Stroke Centers (PSC) in Nova Scotia. The study aims to assess healthcare delivery in Nova Scotia over two periods. It seeks to improve stroke care for rural populations by examining nine inputs, including age and distance between PSCs and the Comprehensive Stroke Centre (CSC) that provided EVT treatment, concerning a single output variable: whether EVT is performed or not. In the first phase, 115 patients were treated as Decision-Making Units (DMUs) for ten PSCs by applying an input-oriented Variable Returns to Scale (VRS) assisted by super-efficiency analysis using the Python-based PyDEA tool. This tool is known for its unrestricted capacity to handle DMUs, inputs, and outputs. In the second phase, eight PSCs with low patient numbers were merged into four DMUs, each consisting of two PSCs. These two merged PSCs have limited patients, and the selected PSCs are also geographically close. Two PSCs have been kept separate because they had sufficient patient volume. In the first phase, VRS generated more reasonable efficiency scores for evaluation, while in the second phase, Constant Returns to Scale (CRS) outperformed VRS, yielding better results. In the initial stage of the second phase, ten PSCs were considered as six DMUs using the input-oriented CRS and VRS for 115 patients. Super-efficiency measures were applied in this stage to improve the evaluation process further. In the second part of the second phase, a comparison between the first period (2018–2019) and the second period (2020–2021) was conducted using the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI), considering CRS and VRS to evaluate the relative efficiency and productivity change of six DMUs over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73222,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772442524000662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study applies Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to optimize transfer times and futile transfers of eligible ischemic stroke patients receiving Endovascular Thrombosis (EVT) in Primary Stroke Centers (PSC) in Nova Scotia. The study aims to assess healthcare delivery in Nova Scotia over two periods. It seeks to improve stroke care for rural populations by examining nine inputs, including age and distance between PSCs and the Comprehensive Stroke Centre (CSC) that provided EVT treatment, concerning a single output variable: whether EVT is performed or not. In the first phase, 115 patients were treated as Decision-Making Units (DMUs) for ten PSCs by applying an input-oriented Variable Returns to Scale (VRS) assisted by super-efficiency analysis using the Python-based PyDEA tool. This tool is known for its unrestricted capacity to handle DMUs, inputs, and outputs. In the second phase, eight PSCs with low patient numbers were merged into four DMUs, each consisting of two PSCs. These two merged PSCs have limited patients, and the selected PSCs are also geographically close. Two PSCs have been kept separate because they had sufficient patient volume. In the first phase, VRS generated more reasonable efficiency scores for evaluation, while in the second phase, Constant Returns to Scale (CRS) outperformed VRS, yielding better results. In the initial stage of the second phase, ten PSCs were considered as six DMUs using the input-oriented CRS and VRS for 115 patients. Super-efficiency measures were applied in this stage to improve the evaluation process further. In the second part of the second phase, a comparison between the first period (2018–2019) and the second period (2020–2021) was conducted using the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI), considering CRS and VRS to evaluate the relative efficiency and productivity change of six DMUs over time.
优化血管内血栓切除术下缺血性脑卒中患者转院时间的数据包络分析模型
本研究应用数据包络分析法(DEA)对新斯科舍省初级卒中中心(PSC)接受血管内血栓治疗(EVT)的合格缺血性卒中患者的转院时间和无效转院进行优化。该研究旨在评估新斯科舍省两个时期的医疗服务提供情况。该研究通过对九个输入变量(包括年龄、初级卒中中心与提供 EVT 治疗的综合卒中中心 (CSC) 之间的距离)和一个输出变量(是否实施 EVT)进行研究,力求改善农村人口的卒中治疗。在第一阶段,通过使用基于 Python- 的 PyDEA 工具,在超效率分析的辅助下,应用以输入为导向的规模收益率变量(VRS),将 115 名患者作为 10 个 PSC 的决策单元(DMU)进行处理。该工具以其处理 DMU、输入和输出的无限制能力而著称。在第二阶段,8 个患者人数较少的 PSC 被合并为 4 个 DMU,每个 DMU 由两个 PSC 组成。这两家合并后的初级保健中心的病人数量有限,所选的初级保健中心在地理位置上也很接近。有两家初级保健中心因病人数量充足而被分开。在第一阶段,VRS 得出了更合理的效率评估分数,而在第二阶段,规模恒定收益法(CRS)优于 VRS,取得了更好的结果。在第二阶段的初始阶段,十家初级保健中心被视为六个 DMU,对 115 名患者使用了以投入为导向的 CRS 和 VRS。在这一阶段采用了超效率措施,以进一步改进评估过程。在第二阶段的第二部分,使用马尔奎斯特生产力指数(MPI)对第一阶段(2018-2019 年)和第二阶段(2020-2021 年)进行了比较,考虑了 CRS 和 VRS,以评估六个 DMU 随时间推移的相对效率和生产力变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.)
Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.) Applied Mathematics, Modelling and Simulation, Nursing and Health Professions (General)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
79 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信