Hannah Götze , Caroline Buchen-Tschiskale , Lea Eder , Andreas Pacholski
{"title":"Effects of inhibitors and slit incorporation on NH3 and N2O emission processes after urea application","authors":"Hannah Götze , Caroline Buchen-Tschiskale , Lea Eder , Andreas Pacholski","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of urea fertilizers in agriculture is associated with many negative environmental impacts and is a source of ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions. Such losses from urea fertilizer can be avoided by different mitigation techniques. Three different mitigation principles, urease inhibitor (N-(2-Nitrophenyl) phosphoric triamide, 2-NPT) (UI) alone and urease inhibitor in combination with nitrification inhibitors (N-[3(5)-methyl-1 H-pyrazol-1-yl) methyl] acetamide, MPA) (NI) and closed slit incorporation of urea fertilizer into the soil, were compared on a sandy loam soil at a soil water level of 70 % water-holding capacity. An in vitro microcosm approach with open dynamic incubation chambers was used to monitor NH<sub>3</sub> emissions over two weeks with NH<sub>3</sub> sampling by washing bottles. N<sub>2</sub>O emissions were studied over ten weeks in slow throughflow mesocosms with continuous gas chromatographic (GC) measurements. To get insights into N<sub>2</sub>O production and consumption processes, gas samples were taken after six weeks and N<sub>2</sub>O isotopocules were analyzed by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS). Slit injection showed the greatest effect on NH<sub>3</sub> emission reduction by 79.6 % (40.6 % by UI, and 46.7 % by UINI) compared to surface applied urea. Minor pollution swapping to N<sub>2</sub>O was observed at the beginning of the trial due to incorporation but not in the cumulative emissions over the entire incubation time. The reduction effect of UINI on N<sub>2</sub>O emissions decreased over time with no cumulative emission reduction at the end of experimentation. N<sub>2</sub>O isotopocules confirmed the high contribution of nitrification to N<sub>2</sub>O production. In contrast and bacterial denitrification, nitrifier denitrification and fungal denitrification were involved on a much lower level and N<sub>2</sub>O reduction to N<sub>2</sub> was not pronounced. All NH<sub>3</sub> mitigation measurements where effective to decrease NH<sub>3</sub> emissions while their effects on N<sub>2</sub>O emission varied over time. Factors as crop N uptake and rainfall would further modify the overall effect on N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and need to be considered for final pollution swapping assessment. Further research on the impact of NI on non-target microbial communities is warranted to elucidate potential environmental consequences and long-term efficacy of inhibitor compounds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"378 ","pages":"Article 109307"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924004250","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The use of urea fertilizers in agriculture is associated with many negative environmental impacts and is a source of ammonia (NH3) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. Such losses from urea fertilizer can be avoided by different mitigation techniques. Three different mitigation principles, urease inhibitor (N-(2-Nitrophenyl) phosphoric triamide, 2-NPT) (UI) alone and urease inhibitor in combination with nitrification inhibitors (N-[3(5)-methyl-1 H-pyrazol-1-yl) methyl] acetamide, MPA) (NI) and closed slit incorporation of urea fertilizer into the soil, were compared on a sandy loam soil at a soil water level of 70 % water-holding capacity. An in vitro microcosm approach with open dynamic incubation chambers was used to monitor NH3 emissions over two weeks with NH3 sampling by washing bottles. N2O emissions were studied over ten weeks in slow throughflow mesocosms with continuous gas chromatographic (GC) measurements. To get insights into N2O production and consumption processes, gas samples were taken after six weeks and N2O isotopocules were analyzed by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS). Slit injection showed the greatest effect on NH3 emission reduction by 79.6 % (40.6 % by UI, and 46.7 % by UINI) compared to surface applied urea. Minor pollution swapping to N2O was observed at the beginning of the trial due to incorporation but not in the cumulative emissions over the entire incubation time. The reduction effect of UINI on N2O emissions decreased over time with no cumulative emission reduction at the end of experimentation. N2O isotopocules confirmed the high contribution of nitrification to N2O production. In contrast and bacterial denitrification, nitrifier denitrification and fungal denitrification were involved on a much lower level and N2O reduction to N2 was not pronounced. All NH3 mitigation measurements where effective to decrease NH3 emissions while their effects on N2O emission varied over time. Factors as crop N uptake and rainfall would further modify the overall effect on N2O emissions and need to be considered for final pollution swapping assessment. Further research on the impact of NI on non-target microbial communities is warranted to elucidate potential environmental consequences and long-term efficacy of inhibitor compounds.
期刊介绍:
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.