Ramiro Martín-Devasa, Aurélien Jamoneau, Sophia I. Passy, Juliette Tison-Rosebery, Saúl Blanco, Alex Borrini, Sébastien Boutry, William R. Budnick, Marco Cantonati, Adelaide Clode Valente, Cristina Delgado, Gerald Dörflinger, Vítor Gonçalves, Jenny Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola, Bryan Kennedy, Julien Marquié, Helena Marques, Athina Papatheodoulou, Virpi Pajunen, Javier Pérez-Burillo, Pedro Miguel Raposeiro, Catarina Ritter, António Serafim, Anette Teittinen, Bart Van de Vijver, Jianjun Wang, Janne Soininen
{"title":"A Global Comparison of Stream Diatom Beta Diversity on Islands Versus Continents Across Scales","authors":"Ramiro Martín-Devasa, Aurélien Jamoneau, Sophia I. Passy, Juliette Tison-Rosebery, Saúl Blanco, Alex Borrini, Sébastien Boutry, William R. Budnick, Marco Cantonati, Adelaide Clode Valente, Cristina Delgado, Gerald Dörflinger, Vítor Gonçalves, Jenny Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola, Bryan Kennedy, Julien Marquié, Helena Marques, Athina Papatheodoulou, Virpi Pajunen, Javier Pérez-Burillo, Pedro Miguel Raposeiro, Catarina Ritter, António Serafim, Anette Teittinen, Bart Van de Vijver, Jianjun Wang, Janne Soininen","doi":"10.1111/geb.13916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the patterns of stream diatom beta diversity in islands versus continents across scales, to relate community similarities with spatial and environmental distances and to investigate the role of island characteristics in shaping insular diatom beta diversity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Africa, America, Europe and the Pacific.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>Present.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Stream diatoms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We compared diatom beta diversity between islands and continents at large scales (within biogeographic regions) in two study regions (America and Europe) and at small scales (within islands/equivalent areas in continents) in three regions (Africa, America and Europe) partitioning beta diversity into turnover and nestedness components. We used a partial Mantel test and distance–decay curves to assess how diatom beta diversity on islands and continents is affected by spatial and environmental distances. Finally, using island data from all four regions, we evaluated the relationship between island beta diversity and island latitude, area, age and isolation using linear models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>At large scales, mean dissimilarities were higher on islands than in continents in Europe but lower in America. At smaller scales, the differences varied mostly depending on island isolation. Beta diversity was mainly caused by species turnover. Partial Mantel test and distance–decay curves revealed that spatial and environmental distances shaped diatom beta diversity at large, but not at small scales. Moreover, diatom beta diversity on islands was affected by island latitude, age and isolation, but not by island area.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Diatom beta diversity on islands versus continents and its responses to spatial and environmental factors are scale and region dependent. Incomplete colonisation, evolutionary processes and environmental filtering likely contribute to insular beta diversity, which further varies with island latitude, age and isolation. This study sheds new light on beta diversity of microorganisms on islands and suggests that beta diversity should be explicitly considered in island biogeographical research.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"33 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.13916","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13916","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
To evaluate the patterns of stream diatom beta diversity in islands versus continents across scales, to relate community similarities with spatial and environmental distances and to investigate the role of island characteristics in shaping insular diatom beta diversity.
Location
Africa, America, Europe and the Pacific.
Time Period
Present.
Major Taxa Studied
Stream diatoms.
Methods
We compared diatom beta diversity between islands and continents at large scales (within biogeographic regions) in two study regions (America and Europe) and at small scales (within islands/equivalent areas in continents) in three regions (Africa, America and Europe) partitioning beta diversity into turnover and nestedness components. We used a partial Mantel test and distance–decay curves to assess how diatom beta diversity on islands and continents is affected by spatial and environmental distances. Finally, using island data from all four regions, we evaluated the relationship between island beta diversity and island latitude, area, age and isolation using linear models.
Results
At large scales, mean dissimilarities were higher on islands than in continents in Europe but lower in America. At smaller scales, the differences varied mostly depending on island isolation. Beta diversity was mainly caused by species turnover. Partial Mantel test and distance–decay curves revealed that spatial and environmental distances shaped diatom beta diversity at large, but not at small scales. Moreover, diatom beta diversity on islands was affected by island latitude, age and isolation, but not by island area.
Main Conclusions
Diatom beta diversity on islands versus continents and its responses to spatial and environmental factors are scale and region dependent. Incomplete colonisation, evolutionary processes and environmental filtering likely contribute to insular beta diversity, which further varies with island latitude, age and isolation. This study sheds new light on beta diversity of microorganisms on islands and suggests that beta diversity should be explicitly considered in island biogeographical research.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.