Microbial Community and Functions Depending on Tillage and Straw Returning Management: Consequences for Soil Health and Ecosystem Services

IF 3.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Qing Liu, Hongcui Dai, Liang Wang, Xin Qian, Yingbo Gao, Hui Zhang, Kaichang Liu, Zongxin Li, Kazem Zamanian
{"title":"Microbial Community and Functions Depending on Tillage and Straw Returning Management: Consequences for Soil Health and Ecosystem Services","authors":"Qing Liu,&nbsp;Hongcui Dai,&nbsp;Liang Wang,&nbsp;Xin Qian,&nbsp;Yingbo Gao,&nbsp;Hui Zhang,&nbsp;Kaichang Liu,&nbsp;Zongxin Li,&nbsp;Kazem Zamanian","doi":"10.1002/ldr.5301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Tillage and straw returning are promising practices to improve soil quality, especially because of the unclear controlling effects on microbial communities and functions. A 5-year field experiment in a winter wheat-summer maize cropping system was implemented in the North China Plain to address this research gap. Management practices were deep tillage, rotary tillage, and no-tillage, each with either wheat only or both wheat and maize straw returning. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed to investigate the microbial community, diversity, co-occurrence network, and function in the topsoil (0–20 cm). The associations between soil physiochemical properties and microbial community characteristics were also evaluated. Rotary tillage with only wheat straw returning (RTS) significantly increased Shannon's diversity index by 0.24%–1.71% compared to other treatments. No-tillage with only wheat straw returning (NTS) showed the most stable microbial network with the highest betweenness centrality (199.09), average path distance (2.31), and modularity (0.50). NTS had the highest relative abundance of microbial carbon (C), nitrogen (N) metabolisms, and C fixation pathways. Among deep tillage practices, both wheat and maize straw returning (DTD) were more beneficial to the stability of microbial networks than only wheat straw returning (DTS), yet without improvement in microbial diversity and function. In conclusion, microbial community and function are practical predictors of variations in soil nutrient availability, and pH value in response to different tillage and residue management practices. In particular, our study provides a basis for the development of a sustainable crop residue management system.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"35 17","pages":"5357-5366"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ldr.5301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tillage and straw returning are promising practices to improve soil quality, especially because of the unclear controlling effects on microbial communities and functions. A 5-year field experiment in a winter wheat-summer maize cropping system was implemented in the North China Plain to address this research gap. Management practices were deep tillage, rotary tillage, and no-tillage, each with either wheat only or both wheat and maize straw returning. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed to investigate the microbial community, diversity, co-occurrence network, and function in the topsoil (0–20 cm). The associations between soil physiochemical properties and microbial community characteristics were also evaluated. Rotary tillage with only wheat straw returning (RTS) significantly increased Shannon's diversity index by 0.24%–1.71% compared to other treatments. No-tillage with only wheat straw returning (NTS) showed the most stable microbial network with the highest betweenness centrality (199.09), average path distance (2.31), and modularity (0.50). NTS had the highest relative abundance of microbial carbon (C), nitrogen (N) metabolisms, and C fixation pathways. Among deep tillage practices, both wheat and maize straw returning (DTD) were more beneficial to the stability of microbial networks than only wheat straw returning (DTS), yet without improvement in microbial diversity and function. In conclusion, microbial community and function are practical predictors of variations in soil nutrient availability, and pH value in response to different tillage and residue management practices. In particular, our study provides a basis for the development of a sustainable crop residue management system.

取决于耕作和秸秆还田管理的微生物群落和功能:对土壤健康和生态系统服务的影响
耕作和秸秆还田是很有前景的改善土壤质量的方法,尤其是因为其对微生物群落和功能的控制作用尚不明确。为了填补这一研究空白,我们在华北平原进行了一项为期 5 年的冬小麦-夏玉米种植系统田间试验。管理方法有深耕、旋耕和免耕,每种方法都有小麦秸秆还田或小麦和玉米秸秆还田。对表层土壤(0-20 厘米)的微生物群落、多样性、共生网络和功能进行了射枪元基因组测序。此外,还评估了土壤理化性质与微生物群落特征之间的关联。与其他处理相比,只进行小麦秸秆还田的旋耕(RTS)显著提高了香农多样性指数,提高幅度为 0.24%-1.71%。只有小麦秸秆还田的免耕(NTS)显示出最稳定的微生物网络,具有最高的间度中心性(199.09)、平均路径距离(2.31)和模块性(0.50)。NTS 的微生物碳(C)、氮(N)代谢和固碳途径的相对丰度最高。在深耕方法中,小麦和玉米秸秆还田(DTD)比仅小麦秸秆还田(DTS)更有利于微生物网络的稳定,但微生物多样性和功能并未得到改善。总之,微生物群落和功能是预测不同耕作和残留物管理方法下土壤养分可用性和 pH 值变化的实用指标。特别是,我们的研究为开发可持续的作物残留物管理系统提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信