Single- and Multilevel Perspectives on Covariate Selection in Randomized Intervention Studies on Student Achievement

IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Sophie E. Stallasch, Oliver Lüdtke, Cordula Artelt, Larry V. Hedges, Martin Brunner
{"title":"Single- and Multilevel Perspectives on Covariate Selection in Randomized Intervention Studies on Student Achievement","authors":"Sophie E. Stallasch, Oliver Lüdtke, Cordula Artelt, Larry V. Hedges, Martin Brunner","doi":"10.1007/s10648-024-09898-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Well-chosen covariates boost the design sensitivity of individually and cluster-randomized trials. We provide guidance on covariate selection generating an extensive compilation of single- and multilevel design parameters on student achievement. Embedded in psychometric heuristics, we analyzed (a) covariate <i>types</i> of varying bandwidth-fidelity, namely domain-identical (IP), cross-domain (CP), and fluid intelligence (Gf) pretests, as well as sociodemographic characteristics (SC); (b) covariate <i>combinations</i> quantifying incremental validities of CP, Gf, and/or SC beyond IP; and (c) covariate <i>time lags</i> of 1–7 years, testing validity degradation in IP, CP, and Gf. Estimates from six German samples (1868 ≤ <i>N</i> ≤ 10,543) covering various outcome domains across grades 1–12 were meta-analyzed and included in precision simulations. Results varied widely by grade level, domain, and hierarchical level. In general, IP outperformed CP, which slightly outperformed Gf and SC. Benefits from coupling IP with CP, Gf, and/or SC were small. IP appeared most affected by temporal validity decay. Findings are applied in illustrative scenarios of study planning and enriched by comprehensive Online Supplemental Material (OSM) accessible via the Open Science Framework (OSF; https://osf.io/nhx4w).</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09898-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Well-chosen covariates boost the design sensitivity of individually and cluster-randomized trials. We provide guidance on covariate selection generating an extensive compilation of single- and multilevel design parameters on student achievement. Embedded in psychometric heuristics, we analyzed (a) covariate types of varying bandwidth-fidelity, namely domain-identical (IP), cross-domain (CP), and fluid intelligence (Gf) pretests, as well as sociodemographic characteristics (SC); (b) covariate combinations quantifying incremental validities of CP, Gf, and/or SC beyond IP; and (c) covariate time lags of 1–7 years, testing validity degradation in IP, CP, and Gf. Estimates from six German samples (1868 ≤ N ≤ 10,543) covering various outcome domains across grades 1–12 were meta-analyzed and included in precision simulations. Results varied widely by grade level, domain, and hierarchical level. In general, IP outperformed CP, which slightly outperformed Gf and SC. Benefits from coupling IP with CP, Gf, and/or SC were small. IP appeared most affected by temporal validity decay. Findings are applied in illustrative scenarios of study planning and enriched by comprehensive Online Supplemental Material (OSM) accessible via the Open Science Framework (OSF; https://osf.io/nhx4w).

Abstract Image

从单层次和多层次角度看学生成绩随机干预研究中的协变量选择
精心选择的协变量可提高单独随机试验和分组随机试验的设计灵敏度。我们通过对学生成绩的单层次和多层次设计参数的广泛汇编,为协变量的选择提供了指导。结合心理测量启发式,我们分析了(a)不同带宽保真度的协变量类型,即相同领域(IP)、跨领域(CP)和流体智力(Gf)前测,以及社会人口学特征(SC);(b)量化 CP、Gf 和/或 SC 的增量有效性的协变量组合,超出 IP;以及(c)1-7 年的协变量时滞,测试 IP、CP 和 Gf 的有效性退化。对六个德国样本(1868 ≤ N ≤ 10,543 人)的估计值进行了元分析,涵盖了 1-12 年级的不同结果领域,并将其纳入精确度模拟中。不同年级、不同领域和不同层次的结果差异很大。总体而言,IP 的表现优于 CP,而 CP 的表现略优于 Gf 和 SC。将 IP 与 CP、Gf 和/或 SC 结合使用的优势很小。IP 受时间有效性衰减的影响似乎最大。研究结果应用于研究规划的说明性情景中,并通过开放科学框架(OSF; https://osf.io/nhx4w)访问全面的在线补充材料(OSM)加以丰富。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Psychology Review
Educational Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Educational Psychology Review aims to disseminate knowledge and promote dialogue within the field of educational psychology. It serves as a platform for the publication of various types of articles, including peer-reviewed integrative reviews, special thematic issues, reflections on previous research or new research directions, interviews, and research-based advice for practitioners. The journal caters to a diverse readership, ranging from generalists in educational psychology to experts in specific areas of the discipline. The content offers a comprehensive coverage of topics and provides in-depth information to meet the needs of both specialized researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信