A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors influencing patient-reported arm symptoms post-breast cancer treatment: Accounting for radiotherapy impact

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yuqin Liang , Yuedan Zhou , Ruud Houben , Karolien Verhoeven , Sofia Rivera , Liesbeth J. Boersma
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors influencing patient-reported arm symptoms post-breast cancer treatment: Accounting for radiotherapy impact","authors":"Yuqin Liang ,&nbsp;Yuedan Zhou ,&nbsp;Ruud Houben ,&nbsp;Karolien Verhoeven ,&nbsp;Sofia Rivera ,&nbsp;Liesbeth J. Boersma","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To systematically review risk factors for patient-reported arm symptoms (AS) in breast cancer (BC), considering radiotherapy (RT) impact, using the EORTC QLQ-BR23 questionnaire (BR23).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched using the keywords \"breast neoplasms\", \"radiotherapy\", and \"BR23\" up to March 5th, 2024. Inclusion criteria: both univariate and multivariate analyses. Exclusion criteria: pregnancy, recurrence, distant metastasis BC, reirradiation, or lack of RT. The risk of bias of included papers was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklist. Descriptive and meta-analyses were conducted using risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) as effect measures. A random-effects model was applied if I<sup>2</sup> &gt; 50 %.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighteen out of 734 studies were included, with sample sizes ranging from 172 to 2208. Commonly reported risk factors included axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), mastectomy, chemotherapy (CT), and RT (6, 5, 4, and 4 studies, respectively). In meta-analyses, ALND was a risk factor for arm pain (RR [95 % CI] = 1.75 [1.14; 2.71]), lymphedema (RR [95 % CI] = 5.41 [3.48; 8.39]), and overall AS (SMD [95 % CI] = 0.49 [0.14; 0.83]) compared to sentinel lymph node biopsy. RT was not a risk factor, but axillary RT significantly increased overall AS (SMD [95 % CI] = 0.55 [0.40; 0.70]) compared to no axillary RT.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ALND and mastectomy were the primary risk factors for patient-reported AS. Axillary RT was a significant risk factor, whereas general RT was not.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 103812"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977624001437/pdfft?md5=10ff023227409fb4ee60cd029f41a62c&pid=1-s2.0-S0960977624001437-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977624001437","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To systematically review risk factors for patient-reported arm symptoms (AS) in breast cancer (BC), considering radiotherapy (RT) impact, using the EORTC QLQ-BR23 questionnaire (BR23).

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched using the keywords "breast neoplasms", "radiotherapy", and "BR23" up to March 5th, 2024. Inclusion criteria: both univariate and multivariate analyses. Exclusion criteria: pregnancy, recurrence, distant metastasis BC, reirradiation, or lack of RT. The risk of bias of included papers was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklist. Descriptive and meta-analyses were conducted using risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) as effect measures. A random-effects model was applied if I2 > 50 %.

Results

Eighteen out of 734 studies were included, with sample sizes ranging from 172 to 2208. Commonly reported risk factors included axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), mastectomy, chemotherapy (CT), and RT (6, 5, 4, and 4 studies, respectively). In meta-analyses, ALND was a risk factor for arm pain (RR [95 % CI] = 1.75 [1.14; 2.71]), lymphedema (RR [95 % CI] = 5.41 [3.48; 8.39]), and overall AS (SMD [95 % CI] = 0.49 [0.14; 0.83]) compared to sentinel lymph node biopsy. RT was not a risk factor, but axillary RT significantly increased overall AS (SMD [95 % CI] = 0.55 [0.40; 0.70]) compared to no axillary RT.

Conclusion

ALND and mastectomy were the primary risk factors for patient-reported AS. Axillary RT was a significant risk factor, whereas general RT was not.
对影响乳腺癌治疗后患者报告的手臂症状的风险因素进行系统回顾和荟萃分析:考虑放疗的影响
目的 使用 EORTC QLQ-BR23 问卷(BR23)系统回顾乳腺癌(BC)患者报告的手臂症状(AS)的风险因素,并考虑放疗(RT)的影响。方法 截至 2024 年 3 月 5 日,使用关键词 "乳腺肿瘤"、"放疗 "和 "BR23 "检索 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、MEDLINE 和 Web of Science。纳入标准:单变量和多变量分析。排除标准:妊娠、复发、BC远处转移、再次放疗或未进行放疗。采用批判性评估技能计划(CASP)清单对纳入论文的偏倚风险进行评估。采用风险比 (RR) 或标准化平均差 (SMD) 及 95% 置信区间 (CI) 作为效应测量指标,进行描述性分析和荟萃分析。结果734项研究中有18项被纳入,样本量从172到2208不等。常见的风险因素包括腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)、乳房切除术、化疗(CT)和 RT(分别有 6、5、4 和 4 项研究)。在荟萃分析中,与前哨淋巴结活检相比,ALND是手臂疼痛(RR [95 % CI] = 1.75 [1.14; 2.71])、淋巴水肿(RR [95 % CI] = 5.41 [3.48; 8.39])和总体AS(SMD [95 % CI] = 0.49 [0.14; 0.83])的风险因素。RT不是风险因素,但与无腋窝RT相比,腋窝RT会显著增加总的AS(SMD [95 % CI] = 0.55 [0.40; 0.70])。腋窝RT是一个重要的风险因素,而普通RT则不是。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breast
Breast 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Breast is an international, multidisciplinary journal for researchers and clinicians, which focuses on translational and clinical research for the advancement of breast cancer prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all stages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信