Computational fluid dynamic simulation of earth air heat exchanger: A thermal performance comparison between series and parallel arrangements

IF 6 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sarwo Edhy Sofyan , Teuku Meurah Indra Riayatsyah , Khairil , Eric Hu , Akram Tamlicha , Teuku Muhammad Reza Pahlefi , H.B. Aditiya
{"title":"Computational fluid dynamic simulation of earth air heat exchanger: A thermal performance comparison between series and parallel arrangements","authors":"Sarwo Edhy Sofyan ,&nbsp;Teuku Meurah Indra Riayatsyah ,&nbsp;Khairil ,&nbsp;Eric Hu ,&nbsp;Akram Tamlicha ,&nbsp;Teuku Muhammad Reza Pahlefi ,&nbsp;H.B. Aditiya","doi":"10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study uses Ansys Fluent to compare the thermal performance of series and parallel earth air heat exchanger (EAHE) systems for cooling. The model was validated using experimental data from published literature and matched simulation results. The sensitivity study examined how length, diameter, and ground surface coverings affected EAHE performance. The relationship between effectiveness and the Number Transfer Unit (NTU) of EAHE was explored along with the soil thermal regime. The simulation results show that the series EAHE can achieve a lower temperature drop than parallel. With an input air temperature of 32 °C and EAHE lengths varying from 10 m to 50 m (in 10 m increments), the 50 m EAHE produced the lowest outlet air temperatures: 27.2 °C for the series configuration and 28.8 °C for the parallel arrangement. Changing the EAHE diameter (4–6 in) results in a ±0.2 °C outlet air temperature drop for both setups. EAHE performed best under short grass soil cover, yielding 1.4 °C and 0.5 °C lower outlet air temperatures, for series and parallel arrangements than the asphalt cover. The pressure drop increased proportionally with EAHE's length. Simulation results indicate a ±6 times larger pressure loss in the series design compared to the parallel setup. The effectiveness-NTU relationship shows that parallel EAHEs are 15 % more effective than series ones.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36919,"journal":{"name":"Results in Engineering","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 102932"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123024011873/pdfft?md5=8dc4994c755b8d718e878caee52e1656&pid=1-s2.0-S2590123024011873-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123024011873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study uses Ansys Fluent to compare the thermal performance of series and parallel earth air heat exchanger (EAHE) systems for cooling. The model was validated using experimental data from published literature and matched simulation results. The sensitivity study examined how length, diameter, and ground surface coverings affected EAHE performance. The relationship between effectiveness and the Number Transfer Unit (NTU) of EAHE was explored along with the soil thermal regime. The simulation results show that the series EAHE can achieve a lower temperature drop than parallel. With an input air temperature of 32 °C and EAHE lengths varying from 10 m to 50 m (in 10 m increments), the 50 m EAHE produced the lowest outlet air temperatures: 27.2 °C for the series configuration and 28.8 °C for the parallel arrangement. Changing the EAHE diameter (4–6 in) results in a ±0.2 °C outlet air temperature drop for both setups. EAHE performed best under short grass soil cover, yielding 1.4 °C and 0.5 °C lower outlet air temperatures, for series and parallel arrangements than the asphalt cover. The pressure drop increased proportionally with EAHE's length. Simulation results indicate a ±6 times larger pressure loss in the series design compared to the parallel setup. The effectiveness-NTU relationship shows that parallel EAHEs are 15 % more effective than series ones.
土空气热交换器的计算流体动力学模拟:串联和并联布置的热性能比较
本研究使用 Ansys Fluent 对用于冷却的串联和并联地球空气热交换器(EAHE)系统的热性能进行了比较。利用已发表文献中的实验数据和匹配的模拟结果对模型进行了验证。敏感性研究考察了长度、直径和地表覆盖物对 EAHE 性能的影响。此外,还探讨了 EAHE 效能与传热系数(NTU)之间的关系,以及土壤热制度。模拟结果表明,串联式 EAHE 比并联式 EAHE 的温降更低。输入空气温度为 32 °C,EAHE 长度从 10 米到 50 米不等(以 10 米为增量),50 米长的 EAHE 产生的出口空气温度最低:串联配置为 27.2 °C,并联配置为 28.8 °C。改变 EAHE 的直径(4-6 英寸)会导致两种设置的出口空气温度下降 ±0.2 °C。EAHE 在短草土壤覆盖下表现最佳,串联和并联布置的出口空气温度分别比沥青覆盖低 1.4 °C 和 0.5 °C。压降随 EAHE 的长度成比例增加。模拟结果表明,串联设计的压力损失是并联设计的 ±6 倍。效果-NTU 关系表明,并联 EAHE 比串联 EAHE 的效果高 15%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Results in Engineering
Results in Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
34.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信