Assessing ensemble models for carbon sequestration and storage estimation in forests using remote sensing data

IF 5.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Mehdi Fasihi , Beatrice Portelli , Luca Cadez , Antonio Tomao , Alex Falcon , Giorgio Alberti , Giuseppe Serra
{"title":"Assessing ensemble models for carbon sequestration and storage estimation in forests using remote sensing data","authors":"Mehdi Fasihi ,&nbsp;Beatrice Portelli ,&nbsp;Luca Cadez ,&nbsp;Antonio Tomao ,&nbsp;Alex Falcon ,&nbsp;Giorgio Alberti ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Serra","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forests play a crucial role in storing much of the world's carbon (C). Accurately estimating C sequestration is essential for addressing and mitigating the impacts of global warming. While many studies have used machine learning models to estimate carbon storage (CS) in forests based on remote sensing data, this research further examines C sequestration (i.e., the annual carbon uptake by trees; CSE). The objectives of this study are two-fold: firstly, to identify the best models for estimating CSE and CS by testing various methods, and secondly, to examine the effect of climatic data and the canopy height model (CHM) on the estimation of CSE. To achieve the first objective, we will compare the performance of fourteen models, including twelve machine learning models, one deep learning model, and an ensemble model that combines the top four independent models. For the second objective, we study the effect of four input configurations: the first is a baseline configuration based solely on attributes extracted from satellite images (Sentinel-2) and geomorphology; the second combines satellite features with climatic data; the third uses a CHM derived from LiDAR instead of climatic data; and the fourth combines all available features: satellite images, climatic data, and CHM. The results show that adding climatic data does not improve the estimation of CSE and CS. However, adding CHM features significantly improves the models' performance for both targets. The implemented ensemble model demonstrated the best performance across all configurations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51024,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Informatics","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 102828"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954124003704/pdfft?md5=eb92d5fb2830af94093c7200733c38bc&pid=1-s2.0-S1574954124003704-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954124003704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forests play a crucial role in storing much of the world's carbon (C). Accurately estimating C sequestration is essential for addressing and mitigating the impacts of global warming. While many studies have used machine learning models to estimate carbon storage (CS) in forests based on remote sensing data, this research further examines C sequestration (i.e., the annual carbon uptake by trees; CSE). The objectives of this study are two-fold: firstly, to identify the best models for estimating CSE and CS by testing various methods, and secondly, to examine the effect of climatic data and the canopy height model (CHM) on the estimation of CSE. To achieve the first objective, we will compare the performance of fourteen models, including twelve machine learning models, one deep learning model, and an ensemble model that combines the top four independent models. For the second objective, we study the effect of four input configurations: the first is a baseline configuration based solely on attributes extracted from satellite images (Sentinel-2) and geomorphology; the second combines satellite features with climatic data; the third uses a CHM derived from LiDAR instead of climatic data; and the fourth combines all available features: satellite images, climatic data, and CHM. The results show that adding climatic data does not improve the estimation of CSE and CS. However, adding CHM features significantly improves the models' performance for both targets. The implemented ensemble model demonstrated the best performance across all configurations.

Abstract Image

利用遥感数据评估森林固碳和储碳估算的集合模型
森林在储存全球大部分碳(C)方面发挥着至关重要的作用。准确估算碳螯合量对于应对和减轻全球变暖的影响至关重要。许多研究都使用机器学习模型来估算基于遥感数据的森林碳储量(CS),而本研究则进一步研究碳固存(即树木的年碳吸收量;CSE)。本研究的目标有两个:首先,通过测试各种方法确定估算 CSE 和 CS 的最佳模型;其次,研究气候数据和冠层高度模型 (CHM) 对 CSE 估算的影响。为了实现第一个目标,我们将比较十四个模型的性能,包括十二个机器学习模型、一个深度学习模型和一个结合了前四个独立模型的集合模型。对于第二个目标,我们研究了四种输入配置的效果:第一种是仅基于从卫星图像(哨兵-2)和地貌学中提取的属性的基线配置;第二种是将卫星特征与气候数据相结合;第三种是使用从激光雷达中提取的 CHM,而不是气候数据;第四种是结合所有可用特征:卫星图像、气候数据和 CHM。结果表明,添加气候数据并不能改善 CSE 和 CS 的估算。然而,加入 CHM 特征后,模型对这两个目标的性能都有明显改善。在所有配置中,已实施的集合模型表现最佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Informatics
Ecological Informatics 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
346
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ecological Informatics is devoted to the publication of high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of computational ecology, data science and biogeography. The scope of the journal takes into account the data-intensive nature of ecology, the growing capacity of information technology to access, harness and leverage complex data as well as the critical need for informing sustainable management in view of global environmental and climate change. The nature of the journal is interdisciplinary at the crossover between ecology and informatics. It focuses on novel concepts and techniques for image- and genome-based monitoring and interpretation, sensor- and multimedia-based data acquisition, internet-based data archiving and sharing, data assimilation, modelling and prediction of ecological data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信