Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for dMMR and pMMR colorectal cancers: therapeutic strategies and putative biomarkers of response

IF 81.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Christopher J. M. Williams, Allyson M. Peddle, Pashtoon M. Kasi, Jenny F. Seligmann, Campbell S. Roxburgh, Gary W. Middleton, Sabine Tejpar
{"title":"Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for dMMR and pMMR colorectal cancers: therapeutic strategies and putative biomarkers of response","authors":"Christopher J. M. Williams, Allyson M. Peddle, Pashtoon M. Kasi, Jenny F. Seligmann, Campbell S. Roxburgh, Gary W. Middleton, Sabine Tejpar","doi":"10.1038/s41571-024-00943-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approximately 15% of locally advanced colorectal cancers (CRC) have DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), resulting in high microsatellite instability and a high tumour mutational burden. These cancers are frequently sensitive to therapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the metastatic setting. This sensitivity seems to be even more pronounced in locally advanced disease, and organ preservation has become a realistic aim in ongoing clinical trials involving patients with dMMR rectal cancer. By contrast, metastatic CRCs with proficient DNA mismatch repair (pMMR) are generally resistant to ICIs, although a proportion of locally advanced pMMR tumours seem to have a high degree of sensitivity to ICIs. In this Review, we describe the current and emerging clinical evidence supporting the use of neoadjuvant ICIs in patients with dMMR and pMMR CRC, and the potential advantages (based on a biological rationale) of such an approach. We discuss how neoadjuvant ‘window-of-opportunity’ trials are being leveraged to progress biomarker discovery and we provide an overview of potential predictive biomarkers of response to ICIs, exploring the challenges faced when evaluating such biomarkers in biopsy-derived samples. Lastly, we describe how these discoveries might be used to drive a rational approach to trialling novel immunotherapeutic strategies in patients with pMMR CRC, with the ultimate aim of disease eradication and the generation of long-term immunosurveillance. Locally advanced colorectal cancers (CRCs) with DNA mismatch repair deficiency have sensitivity to immune-checkpoint inhibitors, and evidence suggests that this is also the case for a proportion of proficient DNA mismatch repair CRCs. The authors of this Review describe the emerging clinical evidence supporting the use of neoadjuvant immune-checkpoint inhibitors in patients with CRC and discuss how clinical research (including on biomarkers) can be used to improve clinical outcomes in this setting.","PeriodicalId":19079,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","volume":"21 12","pages":"839-851"},"PeriodicalIF":81.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41571-024-00943-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41571-024-00943-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximately 15% of locally advanced colorectal cancers (CRC) have DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), resulting in high microsatellite instability and a high tumour mutational burden. These cancers are frequently sensitive to therapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the metastatic setting. This sensitivity seems to be even more pronounced in locally advanced disease, and organ preservation has become a realistic aim in ongoing clinical trials involving patients with dMMR rectal cancer. By contrast, metastatic CRCs with proficient DNA mismatch repair (pMMR) are generally resistant to ICIs, although a proportion of locally advanced pMMR tumours seem to have a high degree of sensitivity to ICIs. In this Review, we describe the current and emerging clinical evidence supporting the use of neoadjuvant ICIs in patients with dMMR and pMMR CRC, and the potential advantages (based on a biological rationale) of such an approach. We discuss how neoadjuvant ‘window-of-opportunity’ trials are being leveraged to progress biomarker discovery and we provide an overview of potential predictive biomarkers of response to ICIs, exploring the challenges faced when evaluating such biomarkers in biopsy-derived samples. Lastly, we describe how these discoveries might be used to drive a rational approach to trialling novel immunotherapeutic strategies in patients with pMMR CRC, with the ultimate aim of disease eradication and the generation of long-term immunosurveillance. Locally advanced colorectal cancers (CRCs) with DNA mismatch repair deficiency have sensitivity to immune-checkpoint inhibitors, and evidence suggests that this is also the case for a proportion of proficient DNA mismatch repair CRCs. The authors of this Review describe the emerging clinical evidence supporting the use of neoadjuvant immune-checkpoint inhibitors in patients with CRC and discuss how clinical research (including on biomarkers) can be used to improve clinical outcomes in this setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

针对dMMR和pMMR结直肠癌的新辅助免疫疗法:治疗策略和反应的假定生物标志物
大约 15%的局部晚期结直肠癌(CRC)存在 DNA 错配修复缺陷(dMMR),导致微卫星高度不稳定和高肿瘤突变负荷。这些癌症往往对转移性免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗敏感。这种敏感性在局部晚期疾病中似乎更为明显,在目前涉及 dMMR 直肠癌患者的临床试验中,保留器官已成为一个现实的目标。相比之下,具有熟练 DNA 错配修复(pMMR)能力的转移性 CRC 通常对 ICIs 具有抗药性,尽管一部分局部晚期 pMMR 肿瘤似乎对 ICIs 具有高度敏感性。在本综述中,我们将介绍支持在 dMMR 和 pMMR CRC 患者中使用新辅助 ICIs 的现有和新出现的临床证据,以及这种方法的潜在优势(基于生物学原理)。我们讨论了如何利用新辅助 "机会之窗 "试验来推动生物标志物的发现,并概述了对 ICIs 反应的潜在预测性生物标志物,探讨了在活检样本中评估此类生物标志物所面临的挑战。最后,我们介绍了如何利用这些发现来推动在 pMMR CRC 患者中试用新型免疫治疗策略的合理方法,最终达到根除疾病和产生长期免疫监视的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
99.40
自引率
0.40%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews publishes clinical content authored by internationally renowned clinical academics and researchers, catering to readers in the medical sciences at postgraduate levels and beyond. Although targeted at practicing doctors, researchers, and academics within specific specialties, the aim is to ensure accessibility for readers across various medical disciplines. The journal features in-depth Reviews offering authoritative and current information, contextualizing topics within the history and development of a field. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section provide topical discussions, opinions, and filtered primary research from diverse medical journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信