Mediating role of energy uncertainty for environmental management in electricity generation: The evidence from Pakistan

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Muhammad Shahbaz , Bekhzod Kuziboev , Kamil Pícha , Ilyos Abdullaev , Leon Moise Minani , Sharifa Jumaniyazova
{"title":"Mediating role of energy uncertainty for environmental management in electricity generation: The evidence from Pakistan","authors":"Muhammad Shahbaz ,&nbsp;Bekhzod Kuziboev ,&nbsp;Kamil Pícha ,&nbsp;Ilyos Abdullaev ,&nbsp;Leon Moise Minani ,&nbsp;Sharifa Jumaniyazova","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2024.100327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This groundbreaking study examines the relationship between CO2 intensity, aggregated and disaggregated fossil fuels, clean and nuclear energy, and, as a mediating variable, energy uncertainty for Pakistan during 2019M01 and 2022M10 with monthly data. To this end, the ARDL Bound Testing method is used to identify the long-run relationship of the studied factors. The empirical results suggest that under the mediating effect of energy uncertainty, renewables and nuclear energy in electricity generation have a negative association with CO2 intensity. In contrast, fossil fuels in generating electricity influence positively CO2 intensity in the aggregated analysis. Moreover, the disaggregated results under the mediating role of energy uncertainty reveal that only hydro energy reduces CO2 intensity as renewables, bioenergy, wind, and solar energy do not impact CO2 intensity. Both coal and gas energies cause a rise in CO2 intensity. Regarding nuclear energy, it also has a negative relation with CO2 intensity. The increase in energy uncertainty leads to a fall in CO2 intensity in aggregated and disaggregated analyses as well. Wavelet coherence analysis shows that CO2 intensity and energy uncertainty depend on each other dynamically for almost the whole employed period.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100327"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427124000585/pdfft?md5=f3e135296cf8d245f365ef15026e53b1&pid=1-s2.0-S2772427124000585-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427124000585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This groundbreaking study examines the relationship between CO2 intensity, aggregated and disaggregated fossil fuels, clean and nuclear energy, and, as a mediating variable, energy uncertainty for Pakistan during 2019M01 and 2022M10 with monthly data. To this end, the ARDL Bound Testing method is used to identify the long-run relationship of the studied factors. The empirical results suggest that under the mediating effect of energy uncertainty, renewables and nuclear energy in electricity generation have a negative association with CO2 intensity. In contrast, fossil fuels in generating electricity influence positively CO2 intensity in the aggregated analysis. Moreover, the disaggregated results under the mediating role of energy uncertainty reveal that only hydro energy reduces CO2 intensity as renewables, bioenergy, wind, and solar energy do not impact CO2 intensity. Both coal and gas energies cause a rise in CO2 intensity. Regarding nuclear energy, it also has a negative relation with CO2 intensity. The increase in energy uncertainty leads to a fall in CO2 intensity in aggregated and disaggregated analyses as well. Wavelet coherence analysis shows that CO2 intensity and energy uncertainty depend on each other dynamically for almost the whole employed period.
能源不确定性对发电环境管理的中介作用:巴基斯坦的证据
这项开创性的研究利用月度数据,研究了巴基斯坦 2019M01 和 2022M10 期间的二氧化碳强度、化石燃料总量和分类、清洁能源和核能,以及作为中介变量的能源不确定性之间的关系。为此,采用 ARDL 约束检验法来确定所研究因素的长期关系。实证结果表明,在能源不确定性的中介效应下,可再生能源和核能发电与二氧化碳强度呈负相关。相比之下,化石燃料发电在总量分析中对二氧化碳强度有正向影响。此外,能源不确定性中介作用下的分类结果显示,只有水能降低了二氧化碳强度,而可再生能源、生物能、风能和太阳能对二氧化碳强度没有影响。煤炭和天然气能源都会导致二氧化碳浓度上升。核能也与二氧化碳强度呈负相关。在综合和分类分析中,能源不确定性的增加也会导致二氧化碳强度的下降。小波相干性分析表明,几乎在整个使用期间,二氧化碳强度和能源不确定性都是动态相互依存的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信