Sedimentation analysis of the maritime stretch after dredging activities for widening and deepening Santos’ Port Channel

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Patrícia Dalsoglio Garcia, Daniel Muraro Matheus, Tiago Zenker Gireli
{"title":"Sedimentation analysis of the maritime stretch after dredging activities for widening and deepening Santos’ Port Channel","authors":"Patrícia Dalsoglio Garcia,&nbsp;Daniel Muraro Matheus,&nbsp;Tiago Zenker Gireli","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Occupying a prominent position in the world ranking for container handling, the Port of Santos stands out as one of the largest and busiest port complexes globally. It holds the title of the largest port in the Southern Hemisphere and ranks second in Latin America, second only to the Port of Colón in Panama. In 2010, the port started an expansion process in its navigation channel, reaching a minimum width of 220 m and an average design depth of 15 m, allowing safe passage of ships with drafts up to 13.50 m with an additional increase in this measure up to 1 m at high tide. The adjustments made to the sedimentary dynamics of the estuarine channel had a twofold impact: an increase in the amount of maintenance dredging required to keep the channel navigable, and morphological changes in the Ponta da Praia region. Thus, this study seeks to evaluate the management of maintenance dredging in Santos’ Porto by examining the alterations in sediment dynamics in a section on the Porto Channel. For that, we calculated the rate of sedimentation in the channel after its expansion to a depth of −15.0 m, considering the space and temporal variability of these rates. To determine the sediment contribution, we compared of seabed elevation data from consecutive campaigns performed between 2014 and 2019 in the maritime area of the Porto Channel, considering dredged volumes in the sedimentary balance analysis. In addition, we divided the Channel access into 11 control areas to assess sedimentation rates during non-dredging periods. Therefore, over long periods and considering the entire area, the average sedimentation rate was 4.2 × 10<sup>6</sup> m<sup>3</sup>/year, with a standard deviation of 1.7 × 10<sup>6</sup> m<sup>3</sup>/year. We noted in short periods between surveys with higher rates, up to 1.57 × 10<sup>6</sup> m<sup>3</sup>/month, with no correlation to extreme storm events. In addition, we observed a greater sedimentation rate in the curve stretch (areas 5 to 9) than in other control areas. Here, SPA-hired dredges cannot maintain the required depth with this sedimentation rate. The port authority must provide alternative solutions as the access channel deepens. It must intensify the frequency of dredging in the critical sedimentation areas (to the curved stretch of the channel and the entrance to the estuary) to maintain the target depth. When sedimentation rates are high, the efficiency of dredging operations decreases, rendering navigation with loaded vessels unfeasible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 107383"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569124003685","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Occupying a prominent position in the world ranking for container handling, the Port of Santos stands out as one of the largest and busiest port complexes globally. It holds the title of the largest port in the Southern Hemisphere and ranks second in Latin America, second only to the Port of Colón in Panama. In 2010, the port started an expansion process in its navigation channel, reaching a minimum width of 220 m and an average design depth of 15 m, allowing safe passage of ships with drafts up to 13.50 m with an additional increase in this measure up to 1 m at high tide. The adjustments made to the sedimentary dynamics of the estuarine channel had a twofold impact: an increase in the amount of maintenance dredging required to keep the channel navigable, and morphological changes in the Ponta da Praia region. Thus, this study seeks to evaluate the management of maintenance dredging in Santos’ Porto by examining the alterations in sediment dynamics in a section on the Porto Channel. For that, we calculated the rate of sedimentation in the channel after its expansion to a depth of −15.0 m, considering the space and temporal variability of these rates. To determine the sediment contribution, we compared of seabed elevation data from consecutive campaigns performed between 2014 and 2019 in the maritime area of the Porto Channel, considering dredged volumes in the sedimentary balance analysis. In addition, we divided the Channel access into 11 control areas to assess sedimentation rates during non-dredging periods. Therefore, over long periods and considering the entire area, the average sedimentation rate was 4.2 × 106 m3/year, with a standard deviation of 1.7 × 106 m3/year. We noted in short periods between surveys with higher rates, up to 1.57 × 106 m3/month, with no correlation to extreme storm events. In addition, we observed a greater sedimentation rate in the curve stretch (areas 5 to 9) than in other control areas. Here, SPA-hired dredges cannot maintain the required depth with this sedimentation rate. The port authority must provide alternative solutions as the access channel deepens. It must intensify the frequency of dredging in the critical sedimentation areas (to the curved stretch of the channel and the entrance to the estuary) to maintain the target depth. When sedimentation rates are high, the efficiency of dredging operations decreases, rendering navigation with loaded vessels unfeasible.
桑托斯港航道拓宽和加深疏浚活动后的海域沉积分析
桑托斯港在世界集装箱吞吐量排名中占据重要位置,是全球最大、最繁忙的港口群之一。它是南半球最大的港口,在拉丁美洲排名第二,仅次于巴拿马的科隆港。2010 年,该港口开始扩建航道,航道最小宽度达到 220 米,平均设计水深 15 米,允许吃水达 13.50 米的船只安全通过,涨潮时吃水还可增加 1 米。对河口航道沉积动力学的调整产生了两方面的影响:为保持航道通航所需的维护性疏浚量增加,以及普拉亚角地区的形态变化。因此,本研究试图通过考察波尔图海峡一段沉积物动力学的变化,对桑托斯波尔图的维护性疏浚管理进行评估。为此,我们计算了波尔图海峡扩挖至-15.0 米深后的沉积速率,并考虑了这些速率的空间和时间变化。为了确定沉积物的贡献,我们比较了 2014 年至 2019 年期间在波尔图海峡海域连续进行的海床高程数据,并在沉积平衡分析中考虑了疏浚量。此外,我们还将海峡通道划分为 11 个控制区,以评估非疏浚期间的沉积速率。因此,从长期和整个区域来看,平均沉积速率为 4.2 × 106 立方米/年,标准偏差为 1.7 × 106 立方米/年。我们注意到,在两次调查之间的短时间内,沉积速率较高,最高可达 1.57 × 106 立方米/月,但与极端风暴事件无关。此外,我们还观察到曲线段(5 至 9 号区域)的沉积率高于其他对照区。在这种情况下,港务局租用的挖泥船无法保持所需的深度。随着通道的加深,港务局必须提供其他解决方案。港务局必须加强关键沉积区(航道弯曲段和河口入口处)的疏浚频率,以保持目标深度。当沉积率较高时,疏浚作业的效率就会降低,导致满载船只无法航行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信