The Sea in Sea Rescue: Conceptualising solidarity with maritime migrants

IF 4.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
{"title":"The Sea in Sea Rescue: Conceptualising solidarity with maritime migrants","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article conceptualises how the sea comes to matter for practicing solidarity with maritime migrants. Adopting an interdisciplinary approach, the article proposes that migration and border studies' critique of methodological nationalism (Anderson, 2020) and focus on mobility (Scheel and Tazzioli, 2022) can be fruitfully combined with the challenge that ocean studies makes towards modernity's “terracentric normative ideal” (Peters et al., 2018, p. 2) to advance conceptions of <em>maritime</em> solidarity. Consequently, the article asks what happens when you detach solidarity from the “national order of things” and conceptualise it, instead, starting from the sea's “more-than-wet ontology” (Peters &amp; Steinberg, 2019) – a political geography that is constantly in motion. Our argument is empirically grounded in original ethnographic research conducted with civil sea rescue and migrant solidarity actors in the English Channel and the Mediterranean Sea. Drawing on these case studies, we demonstrate how the sea presents migrant solidarity action with both <em>techno-material</em> (wind and waves) and <em>socio-legal</em> (maritime zones and port state control) challenges which solidarity actors navigate through the application of seafaring knowledges and common seafaring practice. We argue that in prioritising <em>seafaring</em> over <em>sedentary logics,</em> the practices of <em>seafaring activists</em> open up new paths to conceptualising solidarity in and beyond maritime geographies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629824001549/pdfft?md5=f30d938cb61da11ffea3a8bf16f31583&pid=1-s2.0-S0962629824001549-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629824001549","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article conceptualises how the sea comes to matter for practicing solidarity with maritime migrants. Adopting an interdisciplinary approach, the article proposes that migration and border studies' critique of methodological nationalism (Anderson, 2020) and focus on mobility (Scheel and Tazzioli, 2022) can be fruitfully combined with the challenge that ocean studies makes towards modernity's “terracentric normative ideal” (Peters et al., 2018, p. 2) to advance conceptions of maritime solidarity. Consequently, the article asks what happens when you detach solidarity from the “national order of things” and conceptualise it, instead, starting from the sea's “more-than-wet ontology” (Peters & Steinberg, 2019) – a political geography that is constantly in motion. Our argument is empirically grounded in original ethnographic research conducted with civil sea rescue and migrant solidarity actors in the English Channel and the Mediterranean Sea. Drawing on these case studies, we demonstrate how the sea presents migrant solidarity action with both techno-material (wind and waves) and socio-legal (maritime zones and port state control) challenges which solidarity actors navigate through the application of seafaring knowledges and common seafaring practice. We argue that in prioritising seafaring over sedentary logics, the practices of seafaring activists open up new paths to conceptualising solidarity in and beyond maritime geographies.
海上救援中的海洋:声援海上移民的概念化
本文从概念上探讨了海洋如何成为声援海上移民的重要因素。文章采用跨学科方法,提出移民与边境研究对方法论民族主义的批判(Anderson, 2020)和对流动性的关注(Sheel and Tazzioli, 2022)可以与海洋研究对现代性的 "陆地中心规范理想"(Peters et al.因此,文章提出了这样一个问题:如果将团结从 "国家事物的秩序 "中剥离出来,转而从海洋的 "比湿润更湿润的本体论"(Peters & Steinberg, 2019)--一种不断运动的政治地理学--出发,将其概念化,会发生什么?我们的论点基于对英吉利海峡和地中海民间海上救援和移民团结行动者的原创人种学研究。通过这些案例研究,我们展示了海洋如何为移民团结行动带来技术-物质(风浪)和社会-法律(海区和港口国家控制)方面的挑战,而团结行动者则通过应用航海知识和共同的航海实践来应对这些挑战。我们认为,在优先考虑航海而非定居逻辑的过程中,航海活动家的实践开辟了在海洋地理中和海洋地理之外将团结概念化的新道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信