Effects of psychological interventions on clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
{"title":"Effects of psychological interventions on clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of psychological interventions on the clinical outcomes of patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL from the establishment of each database to August 1, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on psychological interventions in patients with CVDs were included. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 17.0, and pooled measures were presented as the relative risk (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 32 studies were included, involving 15,814 patients. Our results showed that psychological interventions could reduce cardiac mortality (RR = 0.81, 95 % CI = 0.68 to 0.96) and the occurrence of myocardial infarction (MI) (RR = 0.79, 95 % CI = 0.69 to 0.89), arrhythmia (RR = 0.61, 95 % CI = 0.42 to 0.89) and angina (RR = 0.92, 95 % CI = 0.87 to 0.97). However, no statistically significant differences were detected in the risk of all-cause mortality, all-cause rehospitalization rates, cardiac rehospitalization rates, revascularization, heart failure (HF), or stroke between the psychological intervention and control groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Psychological interventions can reduce cardiac mortality and the occurrence of MI, arrhythmia, and angina in patients with CVDs. It is crucial to incorporate psychological interventions into the existing treatment and management of patients with CVDs. High-quality RCTs should be conducted to explore the optimal psychological intervention methods and the maximum beneficiaries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003507","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of psychological interventions on the clinical outcomes of patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL from the establishment of each database to August 1, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on psychological interventions in patients with CVDs were included. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 17.0, and pooled measures were presented as the relative risk (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI).

Results

A total of 32 studies were included, involving 15,814 patients. Our results showed that psychological interventions could reduce cardiac mortality (RR = 0.81, 95 % CI = 0.68 to 0.96) and the occurrence of myocardial infarction (MI) (RR = 0.79, 95 % CI = 0.69 to 0.89), arrhythmia (RR = 0.61, 95 % CI = 0.42 to 0.89) and angina (RR = 0.92, 95 % CI = 0.87 to 0.97). However, no statistically significant differences were detected in the risk of all-cause mortality, all-cause rehospitalization rates, cardiac rehospitalization rates, revascularization, heart failure (HF), or stroke between the psychological intervention and control groups.

Conclusions

Psychological interventions can reduce cardiac mortality and the occurrence of MI, arrhythmia, and angina in patients with CVDs. It is crucial to incorporate psychological interventions into the existing treatment and management of patients with CVDs. High-quality RCTs should be conducted to explore the optimal psychological intervention methods and the maximum beneficiaries.
心理干预对心血管疾病患者临床疗效的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析
方法我们检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 CINAHL 等数据库从建立到 2023 年 8 月 1 日的内容。纳入了对心血管疾病患者进行心理干预的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用Review Manager 5.3和Stata 17.0进行统计分析,并以相对风险(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)的形式显示汇总结果。结果显示,心理干预可降低心脏病死亡率(RR = 0.81,95 % CI = 0.68 至 0.96)、心肌梗死(RR = 0.79,95 % CI = 0.69 至 0.89)、心律失常(RR = 0.61,95 % CI = 0.42 至 0.89)和心绞痛(RR = 0.92,95 % CI = 0.87 至 0.97)的发生率。结论心理干预可以降低心血管疾病患者的心脏死亡率以及心肌梗死、心律失常和心绞痛的发生率。将心理干预纳入心血管疾病患者的现有治疗和管理至关重要。应进行高质量的 RCT 研究,探索最佳的心理干预方法和最大的受益者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信