Constructing stock portfolios by sorting on ESG ratings: Does the rating provider matter?

IF 7.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
{"title":"Constructing stock portfolios by sorting on ESG ratings: Does the rating provider matter?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An interesting and well documented observation is that the same company receives heterogeneous ESG ratings from different rating providers. Consequently, an important question is whether sorting stocks on ESG ratings of different rating providers results in portfolios that are similar or substantially different regarding their constituents, performance, and risk. We employ the ratings of five rating providers on stocks listed in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), and Japan for the period from 2014 until the end of 2019 and analyze whether the corresponding quintile stock portfolios actually have similar or different portfolio constituents as well as Sharpe ratios, alphas, and idiosyncratic risk. Our analysis indicates that the portfolios considerably differ regarding their constituents. In contrast, and most importantly, Sharpe ratios, alphas, and idiosyncratic risk of corresponding portfolios are not significantly different.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924005003/pdfft?md5=78789a47e12f1cd98d3bca2cfc41f979&pid=1-s2.0-S1057521924005003-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924005003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An interesting and well documented observation is that the same company receives heterogeneous ESG ratings from different rating providers. Consequently, an important question is whether sorting stocks on ESG ratings of different rating providers results in portfolios that are similar or substantially different regarding their constituents, performance, and risk. We employ the ratings of five rating providers on stocks listed in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), and Japan for the period from 2014 until the end of 2019 and analyze whether the corresponding quintile stock portfolios actually have similar or different portfolio constituents as well as Sharpe ratios, alphas, and idiosyncratic risk. Our analysis indicates that the portfolios considerably differ regarding their constituents. In contrast, and most importantly, Sharpe ratios, alphas, and idiosyncratic risk of corresponding portfolios are not significantly different.
根据环境、社会和公司治理评级分类构建股票投资组合:评级提供商重要吗?
一个有趣且有据可查的现象是,同一家公司从不同评级提供商处获得的 ESG 评级各不相同。因此,一个重要的问题是,根据不同评级提供商的环境、社会和公司治理评级对股票进行排序,是否会导致投资组合的成分、业绩和风险相似或大不相同。我们采用了五家评级提供商对北美、欧洲、亚太地区(日本除外)和日本上市股票在 2014 年至 2019 年底期间的评级,并分析了相应的五分位股票投资组合在投资组合成分以及夏普比率、阿尔法和特异性风险方面究竟是相似还是不同。我们的分析表明,这些投资组合的成分差异很大。相反,最重要的是,相应投资组合的夏普比率、阿尔法值和特异性风险并无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信