Temporary ambiguity and memory for the context of spoken language in adults with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Kaitlin M. Lord , Melissa C. Duff , Sarah Brown-Schmidt
{"title":"Temporary ambiguity and memory for the context of spoken language in adults with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury","authors":"Kaitlin M. Lord ,&nbsp;Melissa C. Duff ,&nbsp;Sarah Brown-Schmidt","doi":"10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Language is processed incrementally, with addressees considering multiple candidate interpretations as speech unfolds, supporting the retention of these candidate interpretations in memory. For example, after interpreting the utterance, “<em>Click on the striped bag”</em>, listeners exhibit better memory for non-mentioned items in the context that were temporarily consistent with what was said (e.g., dotted bag), vs. not consistent (e.g., dotted tie), reflecting the encoding of linguistic context in memory. Here, we examine the impact of moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) on memory for the contexts of language use. Participants with moderate-severe TBI (N=71) and non-injured comparison participants (NC, N=85) interpreted temporarily ambiguous utterances in rich contexts. A subsequent memory test demonstrated that participants with TBI exhibited impaired memory for context items and an attenuated memory advantage for mentioned items compared to NC participants. Nonetheless, participants with TBI showed similar, although attenuated, patterns in memory for temporarily-activated items as NC participants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093934X24000944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Language is processed incrementally, with addressees considering multiple candidate interpretations as speech unfolds, supporting the retention of these candidate interpretations in memory. For example, after interpreting the utterance, “Click on the striped bag”, listeners exhibit better memory for non-mentioned items in the context that were temporarily consistent with what was said (e.g., dotted bag), vs. not consistent (e.g., dotted tie), reflecting the encoding of linguistic context in memory. Here, we examine the impact of moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) on memory for the contexts of language use. Participants with moderate-severe TBI (N=71) and non-injured comparison participants (NC, N=85) interpreted temporarily ambiguous utterances in rich contexts. A subsequent memory test demonstrated that participants with TBI exhibited impaired memory for context items and an attenuated memory advantage for mentioned items compared to NC participants. Nonetheless, participants with TBI showed similar, although attenuated, patterns in memory for temporarily-activated items as NC participants.
中重度脑外伤成人口语语境的暂时模糊性和记忆力
语言是渐进式处理的,随着语音的展开,听众会考虑多种候选解释,从而支持在记忆中保留这些候选解释。例如,在解释 "点击条纹包 "这句话后,听者会对上下文中暂时与所说内容一致的未提及项目(如点状包)与不一致的项目(如点状领带)表现出更好的记忆,这反映了记忆中的语言上下文编码。在此,我们研究了中度严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)对语言使用语境记忆的影响。患有中度严重创伤性脑损伤的参与者(71 人)和未受伤的对比参与者(NC,85 人)在丰富的语境中解释了暂时含糊不清的语句。随后的记忆测试表明,与 NC 参与者相比,患有创伤性脑损伤的参与者对语境项目的记忆受损,对提及项目的记忆优势减弱。尽管如此,患有创伤性脑损伤的受试者对临时激活项目的记忆模式与NC受试者相似,尽管有所减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信