A comparison of nitrogen fertiliser decision making systems to profitably close grain yield gaps in semi-arid environments

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Arjun Pandey , James Hunt , James Murray , Kate Maddern , Xiaojuan Wang , Caixian Tang , Kate Finger
{"title":"A comparison of nitrogen fertiliser decision making systems to profitably close grain yield gaps in semi-arid environments","authors":"Arjun Pandey ,&nbsp;James Hunt ,&nbsp;James Murray ,&nbsp;Kate Maddern ,&nbsp;Xiaojuan Wang ,&nbsp;Caixian Tang ,&nbsp;Kate Finger","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Nitrogen (N) deficiency is the single biggest cause of the yield gap in Australian wheat production. Nitrogen fertiliser is a costly input and prediction of crop seasonal demand for N in Australia’s variable climate is difficult, so farmers are conservative with investment in N fertiliser, leading to under-fertilisation and over reliance on soil organic N.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We evaluated the ability of different N decision-making systems to close yield gaps, reduce mining of soil organic N and minimise accumulation of soil nitrate.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 5-year (2018–2022) field experiment was conducted in a rainfed Mediterranean environment at Curyo, Victoria in Australia with different N decision-making systems, namely N bank (NB) targets (100, 125 and 150 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>), Yield Prophet® (YP) at different yield probabilities (25, 50, 75 and 100 %), annual Australian national average N rate (NA45, 45 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>), replacement of N in exported grain (R) and a nil control, as treatments in a randomised complete block design with four replicates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After five years, YP25, YP50, YP75 and NB125 applied on average 49, 30, 4 and 18 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> more N per year than NA45, respectively, and achieved or exceeded economic yield (EY), i.e. 80 % of water-limited potential yield (PY<sub>w</sub>), as opposed to 72 % of PY<sub>w</sub> achieved in NA45. These systems also had a higher 5-year mean gross margin (AUD 469–550 ha<sup>−1</sup>) compared to the NA45 (AUD 401 ha<sup>−1</sup>). Positive 5-year partial N balance (total N input minus total N exported in grain over 5 years) was observed only in the YP25, YP50, NB150 and NB125 treatments (4–93 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>). However, apart from NB125 these treatments had consistently higher soil mineral N levels to 1-m depth compared to NA45 and &lt;2 marginal return:cost ratio. Also nitrate content at 0.7–1.0 m depth in the YP25 and NB150 treatments were consistently higher (<em>p</em> &lt;0.05) than that in NA45.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Low soil nitrate level, achievement of EY and higher gross margin in the NB125 compared to NA45 makes it the N management system best suited for this environment. Additionally, the positive partial N balance (4 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) observed in the system suggests that it is less likely to mine soil organic N compared to NA45 (-39 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>).</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Adoption by growers of the best performing systems should reduce grain yield gaps and reduce mining of soil organic N with no increased risk of environmental N loss.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"318 ","pages":"Article 109576"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429024003290/pdfft?md5=1a8fd023d9116c6f3f72acefdb8731b7&pid=1-s2.0-S0378429024003290-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429024003290","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Nitrogen (N) deficiency is the single biggest cause of the yield gap in Australian wheat production. Nitrogen fertiliser is a costly input and prediction of crop seasonal demand for N in Australia’s variable climate is difficult, so farmers are conservative with investment in N fertiliser, leading to under-fertilisation and over reliance on soil organic N.

Objective

We evaluated the ability of different N decision-making systems to close yield gaps, reduce mining of soil organic N and minimise accumulation of soil nitrate.

Methods

A 5-year (2018–2022) field experiment was conducted in a rainfed Mediterranean environment at Curyo, Victoria in Australia with different N decision-making systems, namely N bank (NB) targets (100, 125 and 150 kg N ha−1), Yield Prophet® (YP) at different yield probabilities (25, 50, 75 and 100 %), annual Australian national average N rate (NA45, 45 kg N ha−1), replacement of N in exported grain (R) and a nil control, as treatments in a randomised complete block design with four replicates.

Results

After five years, YP25, YP50, YP75 and NB125 applied on average 49, 30, 4 and 18 kg ha−1 more N per year than NA45, respectively, and achieved or exceeded economic yield (EY), i.e. 80 % of water-limited potential yield (PYw), as opposed to 72 % of PYw achieved in NA45. These systems also had a higher 5-year mean gross margin (AUD 469–550 ha−1) compared to the NA45 (AUD 401 ha−1). Positive 5-year partial N balance (total N input minus total N exported in grain over 5 years) was observed only in the YP25, YP50, NB150 and NB125 treatments (4–93 kg N ha−1). However, apart from NB125 these treatments had consistently higher soil mineral N levels to 1-m depth compared to NA45 and <2 marginal return:cost ratio. Also nitrate content at 0.7–1.0 m depth in the YP25 and NB150 treatments were consistently higher (p <0.05) than that in NA45.

Conclusions

Low soil nitrate level, achievement of EY and higher gross margin in the NB125 compared to NA45 makes it the N management system best suited for this environment. Additionally, the positive partial N balance (4 kg N ha−1) observed in the system suggests that it is less likely to mine soil organic N compared to NA45 (-39 kg ha−1).

Significance

Adoption by growers of the best performing systems should reduce grain yield gaps and reduce mining of soil organic N with no increased risk of environmental N loss.
比较氮肥决策系统,在半干旱环境中缩小谷物产量差距并从中获利
背景缺氮是造成澳大利亚小麦产量差距的最大原因。氮肥是一种成本高昂的投入品,而且在澳大利亚多变的气候条件下,很难预测作物对氮的季节性需求,因此农民在氮肥投资方面比较保守,导致施肥不足和过度依赖土壤有机氮。方法在澳大利亚维多利亚州库里约的雨水灌溉地中海环境中进行了一项为期 5 年(2018-2022 年)的田间试验,采用不同的氮决策系统,即氮库(NB)目标(100、125 和 150 千克氮公顷-1)、不同产量概率(25、50、75 和 100%)下的产量先知®(YP)、澳大利亚全国年平均氮率(NA45,45 千克氮公顷-1)、出口谷物中的氮替代(R)和无对照,作为处理,采用随机完全区组设计,4 次重复。结果五年后,YP25、YP50、YP75 和 NB125 每年平均施氮量分别比 NA45 高出 49、30、4 和 18 千克/公顷-1,并达到或超过了经济产量(EY),即达到限水潜在产量(PYw)的 80%,而 NA45 只达到PYw 的 72%。这些系统的 5 年平均毛利率(469-550 澳元/公顷-1)也高于 NA45(401 澳元/公顷-1)。只有在 YP25、YP50、NB150 和 NB125 处理(4-93 千克氮公顷-1)中观察到 5 年部分氮平衡为正值(5 年中氮输入总量减去以谷物形式输出的氮总量)。然而,除了 NB125 外,与 NA45 相比,这些处理 1 米深度的土壤矿物氮含量一直较高,边际收益:成本比为 2。结论与 NA45 相比,NB125 的土壤硝酸盐含量低、实现了 EY 且毛利率更高,使其成为最适合这种环境的氮管理系统。此外,在该系统中观察到的正部分氮平衡(4 千克氮公顷-1)表明,与 NA45(-39 千克氮公顷-1)相比,该系统不太可能挖掘土壤中的有机氮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信