Urban Care for Unpaid Caregivers: Community Voices in the Care Block Program, in Bogotá, Colombia.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Paula Guevara-Aladino, Olga L Sarmiento, María Alejandra Rubio, Lina María Gómez-García, Zakaria Nadeem Doueiri, Diego Martínez, Abby C King, Adriana Hurtado-Tarazona, Ann Banchoff, Luis A Guzman, María José Álvarez-Rivadulla, Leonardo Palencia
{"title":"Urban Care for Unpaid Caregivers: Community Voices in the Care Block Program, in Bogotá, Colombia.","authors":"Paula Guevara-Aladino, Olga L Sarmiento, María Alejandra Rubio, Lina María Gómez-García, Zakaria Nadeem Doueiri, Diego Martínez, Abby C King, Adriana Hurtado-Tarazona, Ann Banchoff, Luis A Guzman, María José Álvarez-Rivadulla, Leonardo Palencia","doi":"10.1007/s11524-024-00899-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Care Block of Bogotá, Colombia, is an urban program that offers services for low-income unpaid caregivers. This study aimed to (i) characterize unpaid caregivers' subjective well-being, mental health symptoms, physical activity levels, and use of public spaces linked to the Care Block; (ii) identify caregivers' perceived built and social environment facilitators and barriers to accessing the Care Block facility; and (iii) document the community-led advocacy process to improve the Care Block program. The quantitative component included a subjective well-being and mental health symptoms survey, and the System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC) instrument. The qualitative component included the Our Voice citizen science method augmented with portable virtual reality equipment to engage participants in advocacy for changes. Participants (median age of 53 years) dedicated a median of 13.8 h a day to unpaid caregiving, had an average subjective well-being score of 7.0, and 19.1% and 23.8% reported having depression and generalized anxiety symptoms respectively. Caregivers reported that the program fosters their perception of purpose, enjoyment, resilience, and cognitive and emotional awareness. SOPARC evaluation showed that most women engaged in moderate to vigorous physical activity. The caregivers highlighted education, physical activity services, and integration of facilities as facilitators to accessing the Care Block program. Poor quality and lack of sidewalks and roads, limited personal safety, and the risk of pedestrian-vehicle collisions were identified as barriers. Virtual Reality sparked compelling dialogue between participants and stakeholders, allowing stakeholders to reflect on an urban program facilitating unpaid care work.</p>","PeriodicalId":49964,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-024-00899-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Care Block of Bogotá, Colombia, is an urban program that offers services for low-income unpaid caregivers. This study aimed to (i) characterize unpaid caregivers' subjective well-being, mental health symptoms, physical activity levels, and use of public spaces linked to the Care Block; (ii) identify caregivers' perceived built and social environment facilitators and barriers to accessing the Care Block facility; and (iii) document the community-led advocacy process to improve the Care Block program. The quantitative component included a subjective well-being and mental health symptoms survey, and the System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC) instrument. The qualitative component included the Our Voice citizen science method augmented with portable virtual reality equipment to engage participants in advocacy for changes. Participants (median age of 53 years) dedicated a median of 13.8 h a day to unpaid caregiving, had an average subjective well-being score of 7.0, and 19.1% and 23.8% reported having depression and generalized anxiety symptoms respectively. Caregivers reported that the program fosters their perception of purpose, enjoyment, resilience, and cognitive and emotional awareness. SOPARC evaluation showed that most women engaged in moderate to vigorous physical activity. The caregivers highlighted education, physical activity services, and integration of facilities as facilitators to accessing the Care Block program. Poor quality and lack of sidewalks and roads, limited personal safety, and the risk of pedestrian-vehicle collisions were identified as barriers. Virtual Reality sparked compelling dialogue between participants and stakeholders, allowing stakeholders to reflect on an urban program facilitating unpaid care work.

城市无偿照料者:哥伦比亚波哥大 "护理街区计划 "中的社区之声。
哥伦比亚波哥大的 "关爱街区 "是一项为低收入无酬照护者提供服务的城市计划。这项研究的目的是:(i) 描述无酬照护者的主观幸福感、心理健康症状、体育活动水平以及与照护街区相关的公共空间的使用情况;(ii) 确定照护者认为的建筑和社会环境对使用照护街区设施的促进作用和障碍;(iii) 记录社区主导的改善照护街区计划的宣传过程。定量研究包括主观幸福感和心理健康症状调查,以及社区游戏和娱乐观察系统(SOPARC)工具。定性部分包括 "我们的声音 "公民科学方法,并使用便携式虚拟现实设备,让参与者参与倡导变革。参与者(年龄中位数为 53 岁)每天无偿照顾他人的时间中位数为 13.8 小时,主观幸福感平均得分为 7.0 分,分别有 19.1% 和 23.8% 的人表示有抑郁症和广泛性焦虑症状。护理人员表示,该计划增强了他们的目标感、愉悦感、复原力以及认知和情感意识。SOPARC 评估显示,大多数妇女都参加了中度到剧烈的体育活动。护理人员强调,教育、体育活动服务和设施整合是参与护理街区计划的有利因素。而人行道和道路质量差、缺乏人行道和道路、人身安全受到限制以及行人与车辆发生碰撞的风险则被认为是障碍。虚拟现实技术引发了参与者和利益相关者之间引人注目的对话,使利益相关者能够对促进无偿护理工作的城市计划进行反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Urban Health is the premier and authoritative source of rigorous analyses to advance the health and well-being of people in cities. The Journal provides a platform for interdisciplinary exploration of the evidence base for the broader determinants of health and health inequities needed to strengthen policies, programs, and governance for urban health. The Journal publishes original data, case studies, commentaries, book reviews, executive summaries of selected reports, and proceedings from important global meetings. It welcomes submissions presenting new analytic methods, including systems science approaches to urban problem solving. Finally, the Journal provides a forum linking scholars, practitioners, civil society, and policy makers from the multiple sectors that can influence the health of urban populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信