Latent profiles and predictors of barriers to care in Swiss children and adolescents with rare diseases.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Susanne Wehrli, Matthias R Baumgartner, Andrew A Dwyer, Markus A Landolt
{"title":"Latent profiles and predictors of barriers to care in Swiss children and adolescents with rare diseases.","authors":"Susanne Wehrli, Matthias R Baumgartner, Andrew A Dwyer, Markus A Landolt","doi":"10.1093/jpepsy/jsae076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Children and adolescents with rare diseases face significant barriers when accessing healthcare. We aimed to assess and predict these barriers and investigate associations with health-related quality of life (HRQoL).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of Swiss parents (N = 189) of children with rare diseases including the Barriers to Care Questionnaire (BCQ), containing six barriers and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to uncover distinct classes, which were compared using chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. Relevant medical and sociodemographic class predictors were identified using Elastic Net regression, followed by regression analysis to investigate their role in predicting barriers to care and examine the effects of these classes on HRQoL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two distinct groups were identified, a higher barriers class (59%) and a lower barriers class (41%). In the higher barriers class, participants showed elevated scores across all subscales and specifically on pragmatics and expectations. More barriers to care were linked to a nonstable disease course (OR = 2.27, p = .002) and a diagnosis after the age of 3 months (OR = 2.17, p = .006). Individuals in the higher barriers class exhibited more psychological comorbidities (p = .044), congenital malformations/deformations/chromosomal abnormalities (p=.042), and medical misdiagnoses (p = .006). Children in the higher barriers class had significantly lower PedsQL scores compared to the lower barriers class (p <.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the need for comprehensive assessment of barriers to pediatric care in rare diseases, offering potential entry points for targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"827-839"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsae076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Children and adolescents with rare diseases face significant barriers when accessing healthcare. We aimed to assess and predict these barriers and investigate associations with health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Method: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of Swiss parents (N = 189) of children with rare diseases including the Barriers to Care Questionnaire (BCQ), containing six barriers and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to uncover distinct classes, which were compared using chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. Relevant medical and sociodemographic class predictors were identified using Elastic Net regression, followed by regression analysis to investigate their role in predicting barriers to care and examine the effects of these classes on HRQoL.

Results: Two distinct groups were identified, a higher barriers class (59%) and a lower barriers class (41%). In the higher barriers class, participants showed elevated scores across all subscales and specifically on pragmatics and expectations. More barriers to care were linked to a nonstable disease course (OR = 2.27, p = .002) and a diagnosis after the age of 3 months (OR = 2.17, p = .006). Individuals in the higher barriers class exhibited more psychological comorbidities (p = .044), congenital malformations/deformations/chromosomal abnormalities (p=.042), and medical misdiagnoses (p = .006). Children in the higher barriers class had significantly lower PedsQL scores compared to the lower barriers class (p <.05).

Conclusion: This study highlights the need for comprehensive assessment of barriers to pediatric care in rare diseases, offering potential entry points for targeted interventions.

瑞士罕见病儿童和青少年护理障碍的潜在特征和预测因素。
目的:患有罕见病的儿童和青少年在获得医疗保健服务时面临巨大障碍。我们旨在评估和预测这些障碍,并研究它们与健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)之间的关系:我们对瑞士罕见病患儿的父母(189 人)进行了一项横断面调查,其中包括包含六种障碍的 "医疗障碍问卷"(BCQ)和 "儿科生活质量量表"(PedsQL)。采用潜在特征分析(LPA)发现了不同的类别,并通过卡方检验和曼-惠特尼U检验对这些类别进行了比较。使用弹性网回归法确定了相关的医疗和社会人口类别预测因子,然后进行回归分析,以研究它们在预测护理障碍方面的作用,并研究这些类别对 HRQoL 的影响:结果:确定了两个不同的组别,即障碍较高组别(59%)和障碍较低组别(41%)。在障碍较高的组别中,参与者在所有分量表中的得分都有所提高,特别是在实用性和期望值方面。更多的护理障碍与不稳定的病程(OR = 2.27,p = .002)和 3 个月后的诊断(OR = 2.17,p = .006)有关。障碍等级越高的患儿,其心理并发症(p = .044)、先天畸形/畸形/染色体异常(p=.042)和医疗误诊(p = .006)越多。与障碍等级较低的儿童相比,障碍等级较高的儿童的 PedsQL 得分明显较低(p 结论:PedsQL 得分较高的儿童的 PedsQL 得分明显较低:本研究强调了全面评估罕见病儿科护理障碍的必要性,为有针对性的干预措施提供了潜在的切入点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Journal of Pediatric Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Psychology is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Psychology, Division 54 of the American Psychological Association. The Journal of Pediatric Psychology publishes articles related to theory, research, and professional practice in pediatric psychology. Pediatric psychology is an integrated field of science and practice in which the principles of psychology are applied within the context of pediatric health. The field aims to promote the health and development of children, adolescents, and their families through use of evidence-based methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信