[Learning curve for a five-step procedure, transthoracic single-port assisted laparoscopic transabdominal diaphragmatic approach, for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction].

Q3 Medicine
H P Zeng, Y H Chen, L J Luo, Z J Zhang, Z Y Lin, Y Chen, Y H Peng, T Wang, Y S Zheng, W W Xiong, W Wang
{"title":"[Learning curve for a five-step procedure, transthoracic single-port assisted laparoscopic transabdominal diaphragmatic approach, for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction].","authors":"H P Zeng, Y H Chen, L J Luo, Z J Zhang, Z Y Lin, Y Chen, Y H Peng, T Wang, Y S Zheng, W W Xiong, W Wang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240116-00028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the learning curve for a five-step procedure, namely, a transthoracic single-port assisted laparoscopic transabdominal diaphragmatic approach, for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. <b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed relevant clinical data of 66 patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction who had undergone the five-step procedure performed by the same surgeon in the Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine from May 2017 to April 2023. The learning curve were plotted using cumulative summation analysis and selected indicators, including intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery, time to first flatus, time to first tolerance of liquid food, length of hospital stay, and incidence of perioperative complications at different stages were compared. The data were analyzed using SPSS 24.0 statistical software. Numerical data are presented as cases (%) and data were analyzed using the χ<sup>2</sup> test or Fisher's exact test. Normally distributed measurement data are presented as <i>x±s</i>, and independent sample t-testing was performed for inter group comparison. Non-normally distributed measurement data are presented as <i>M</i>(<i>Q</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>Q</i><sub>3</sub>) and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for inter group comparison. <b>Results:</b> The five-step procedure had been successfully completed without switching to open surgery in all 66 study patients. There were no perioperative deaths, blood loss was 100 (50, 200) mL and duration of surgery 329.4±87.3 minutes. The equation of optimal fit for the duration of surgery was y=0.031x<sup>3</sup>-4.4757x<sup>2</sup>+164.97x-264.4 (<i>P</i><0.001, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>=0.9797). The cumulative summation learning curve reached a vertex when 25 surgical procedures had accumulated. Using 25 cases as the cut-off, we divided the learning curves into learning and proficiency periods and patients into learning (25) and proficiency period groups (41). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients in sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, history of abdominal surgery, comorbidities, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, maximum tumor diameter, surgical procedure, or T and N stage of tumor (<i>P</i>>0.05). The following factors differed significantly (all <i>P</i><0.05) between the learning and proficiency stages: in the latter there was less intraoperative blood loss (100 [50, 100] ml vs. 200 [100, 200] ml, <i>U</i>=-3.940, <i>P</i><0.001), shorter duration of surgery ([289.8±50.7] minutes vs. [394.4±96.0] minutes, <i>t</i>=5.034, <i>P</i><0.001), more mediastinal lymph nodes removed (5 [2, 8] vs. 2 [1, 5], <i>U</i>=-2.518, <i>P</i>=0.012), earlier time to first flatus (2 [2, 3] days vs. 4 [3, 6] days, <i>U</i>=-4.016, <i>P</i><0.001), earlier time to first tolerance of liquid food (5 [4, 6] days vs. 7 [6, 8] days, <i>U</i>=-2.922, <i>P</i>=0.003), shorter duration of hospital stay (8 [8, 10] vs. 10 [9, 12] days, <i>U</i>=-2.028, <i>P</i>=0.043). The incidence of surgical complications did not differ significantly between the two groups (<i>P</i>=0.238). <b>Conclusion:</b> Satisfactory results can be achieved with the five-step procedure for patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction once 25 procedures have been performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 9","pages":"938-944"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华胃肠外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240116-00028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the learning curve for a five-step procedure, namely, a transthoracic single-port assisted laparoscopic transabdominal diaphragmatic approach, for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed relevant clinical data of 66 patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction who had undergone the five-step procedure performed by the same surgeon in the Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine from May 2017 to April 2023. The learning curve were plotted using cumulative summation analysis and selected indicators, including intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery, time to first flatus, time to first tolerance of liquid food, length of hospital stay, and incidence of perioperative complications at different stages were compared. The data were analyzed using SPSS 24.0 statistical software. Numerical data are presented as cases (%) and data were analyzed using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. Normally distributed measurement data are presented as x±s, and independent sample t-testing was performed for inter group comparison. Non-normally distributed measurement data are presented as M(Q1, Q3) and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for inter group comparison. Results: The five-step procedure had been successfully completed without switching to open surgery in all 66 study patients. There were no perioperative deaths, blood loss was 100 (50, 200) mL and duration of surgery 329.4±87.3 minutes. The equation of optimal fit for the duration of surgery was y=0.031x3-4.4757x2+164.97x-264.4 (P<0.001, R2=0.9797). The cumulative summation learning curve reached a vertex when 25 surgical procedures had accumulated. Using 25 cases as the cut-off, we divided the learning curves into learning and proficiency periods and patients into learning (25) and proficiency period groups (41). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients in sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, history of abdominal surgery, comorbidities, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, maximum tumor diameter, surgical procedure, or T and N stage of tumor (P>0.05). The following factors differed significantly (all P<0.05) between the learning and proficiency stages: in the latter there was less intraoperative blood loss (100 [50, 100] ml vs. 200 [100, 200] ml, U=-3.940, P<0.001), shorter duration of surgery ([289.8±50.7] minutes vs. [394.4±96.0] minutes, t=5.034, P<0.001), more mediastinal lymph nodes removed (5 [2, 8] vs. 2 [1, 5], U=-2.518, P=0.012), earlier time to first flatus (2 [2, 3] days vs. 4 [3, 6] days, U=-4.016, P<0.001), earlier time to first tolerance of liquid food (5 [4, 6] days vs. 7 [6, 8] days, U=-2.922, P=0.003), shorter duration of hospital stay (8 [8, 10] vs. 10 [9, 12] days, U=-2.028, P=0.043). The incidence of surgical complications did not differ significantly between the two groups (P=0.238). Conclusion: Satisfactory results can be achieved with the five-step procedure for patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction once 25 procedures have been performed.

[经胸单孔辅助腹腔镜经腹横膈膜入路治疗食管胃交界处 Siewert II 型腺癌五步手术的学习曲线]。
目的研究经胸单孔辅助腹腔镜经腹膈肌入路治疗食管胃交界处 Siewert II 型腺癌五步手术的学习曲线。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们分析了2017年5月至2023年4月期间广东省中医院胃肠外科由同一外科医生实施五步手术的66例食管胃交界处Siewert II型腺癌患者的相关临床资料。采用累积求和分析法绘制学习曲线,并选取不同阶段的术中失血量、手术时间、首次排气时间、首次耐受流质食物时间、住院时间、围术期并发症发生率等指标进行比较。数据使用 SPSS 24.0 统计软件进行分析。数值数据以病例数(%)表示,数据分析采用χ2检验或费雪精确检验。正态分布的测量数据以 x±s 表示,组间比较采用独立样本 t 检验。非正态分布的测量数据以 M(Q1,Q3)表示,组间比较采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验。结果所有 66 名研究对象都成功完成了五步手术,没有改用开放手术。围手术期无死亡病例,失血量为 100(50,200)毫升,手术时间为(329.4±87.3)分钟。手术时间的最佳拟合方程为y=0.031x3-4.4757x2+164.97x-264.4(PR2=0.9797)。累计求和学习曲线在累计完成 25 例手术时达到顶点。以 25 例为分界线,我们将学习曲线分为学习期和熟练期,并将患者分为学习期组(25 例)和熟练期组(41 例)。两组患者在性别、年龄、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会评分、腹部手术史、合并症、术前新辅助治疗、肿瘤最大直径、手术方式、肿瘤T期和N期等方面均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。以下因素有显著差异(全部PU=-3.940,Pt=5.034,PU=-2.518,P=0.012):首次排气时间更早(2 [2, 3] 天 vs. 4 [3, 6] 天,U=-4.016,PU=-2.922,P=0.003),住院时间更短(8 [8, 10] 天 vs. 10 [9, 12] 天,U=-2.028,P=0.043)。两组的手术并发症发生率无明显差异(P=0.238)。结论对食管胃交界处的 Siewert II 型腺癌患者采用五步手术法治疗食管胃交界处的腺癌,只要完成 25 次手术,就能取得满意的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华胃肠外科杂志
中华胃肠外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6776
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信