Haemophilus influenzae Type b Vaccine Immunogenicity in American Indian/Alaska Native Infants.

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Bianca D Jackson, Karen Miernyk, Jonathan Steinberg, Jeanette Beaudry, Loretta Christensen, Uzo Chukwuma, Demetria Clichee, Shawnell Damon, Brooke Amara Farrenkopf, Chloe Hurley, Juan Luna, Brenna Simons, Rosalyn Singleton, Mary Thomas, Dan VanDeRiet, Robert Weatherholtz, Scott Zeger, Sarah Zylstra, James Keck, Laura L Hammitt
{"title":"Haemophilus influenzae Type b Vaccine Immunogenicity in American Indian/Alaska Native Infants.","authors":"Bianca D Jackson, Karen Miernyk, Jonathan Steinberg, Jeanette Beaudry, Loretta Christensen, Uzo Chukwuma, Demetria Clichee, Shawnell Damon, Brooke Amara Farrenkopf, Chloe Hurley, Juan Luna, Brenna Simons, Rosalyn Singleton, Mary Thomas, Dan VanDeRiet, Robert Weatherholtz, Scott Zeger, Sarah Zylstra, James Keck, Laura L Hammitt","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-066658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) infants historically experienced a disproportionate burden of invasive Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) disease, especially early in life. PedvaxHIB vaccine is preferentially recommended for AI/AN infants because it elicits protective antibody levels postdose 1. Vaxelis, a hexavalent vaccine that contains the same Hib conjugate as PedvaxHIB but at lower concentration, is recommended for US children, but postdose 1 Hib immunogenicity data are needed to inform whether a preferential recommendation should be made for AI/AN infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a phase IV randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial comparing postdose 1 immunogenicity of Vaxelis to PedvaxHIB in AI/AN infants. Participants were randomized to receive a primary series of PedvaxHIB or Vaxelis. Serum samples collected 30 days postdose 1 were tested for anti-Hib immunoglobulin G antibody by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The anti-Hib immunoglobulin G geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratio (Vaxelis/PedvaxHIB) was estimated by constrained longitudinal data analysis. Noninferiority was defined a priori as the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the GMC ratio ≥0.67.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 327 of the 333 infants enrolled in the study were included in the per-protocol analysis. The postdose 1 anti-Hib GMC was 0.41 µg/mL (95% CI 0.33-0.52) in the Vaxelis group (n = 152) and 0.39 µg/mL (95% CI 0.31-0.50) in the PedvaxHIB group (n = 146). The constrained longitudinal data analysis GMC ratio was 1.03 (95% CI 0.76-1.39).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postdose 1 immunogenicity of Vaxelis was noninferior to PedvaxHIB. Our findings support the use of Vaxelis in AI/AN children, a population with elevated risk of Hib disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-066658","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) infants historically experienced a disproportionate burden of invasive Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) disease, especially early in life. PedvaxHIB vaccine is preferentially recommended for AI/AN infants because it elicits protective antibody levels postdose 1. Vaxelis, a hexavalent vaccine that contains the same Hib conjugate as PedvaxHIB but at lower concentration, is recommended for US children, but postdose 1 Hib immunogenicity data are needed to inform whether a preferential recommendation should be made for AI/AN infants.

Methods: We conducted a phase IV randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial comparing postdose 1 immunogenicity of Vaxelis to PedvaxHIB in AI/AN infants. Participants were randomized to receive a primary series of PedvaxHIB or Vaxelis. Serum samples collected 30 days postdose 1 were tested for anti-Hib immunoglobulin G antibody by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The anti-Hib immunoglobulin G geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratio (Vaxelis/PedvaxHIB) was estimated by constrained longitudinal data analysis. Noninferiority was defined a priori as the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the GMC ratio ≥0.67.

Results: A total of 327 of the 333 infants enrolled in the study were included in the per-protocol analysis. The postdose 1 anti-Hib GMC was 0.41 µg/mL (95% CI 0.33-0.52) in the Vaxelis group (n = 152) and 0.39 µg/mL (95% CI 0.31-0.50) in the PedvaxHIB group (n = 146). The constrained longitudinal data analysis GMC ratio was 1.03 (95% CI 0.76-1.39).

Conclusions: Postdose 1 immunogenicity of Vaxelis was noninferior to PedvaxHIB. Our findings support the use of Vaxelis in AI/AN children, a population with elevated risk of Hib disease.

美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民婴儿的 b 型流感嗜血杆菌疫苗免疫原性。
目标:美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)婴幼儿患侵袭性 b 型流感嗜血杆菌(Hib)疾病的比例历来过高,尤其是在生命早期。PedvaxHIB 疫苗被优先推荐给亚裔美国人/印第安人婴儿,因为它能在剂量 1 后激发保护性抗体水平。Vaxelis是一种六价疫苗,含有与PedvaxHIB相同的Hib结合物,但浓度较低,被推荐给美国儿童接种,但需要剂量1后的Hib免疫原性数据来说明是否应优先推荐给美国印第安人/非洲裔婴儿:我们进行了一项 IV 期随机、开放标签、非劣效试验,比较 Vaxelis 和 PedvaxHIB 在亚裔美国人/印第安人婴儿中剂量 1 后的免疫原性。参与者被随机分配接受 PedvaxHIB 或 Vaxelis 的主要系列治疗。剂量 1 后 30 天采集的血清样本通过酶联免疫吸附试验检测抗 Hib 免疫球蛋白 G 抗体。抗 Hib 免疫球蛋白 G 几何平均浓度 (GMC) 比值(Vaxelis/PedvaxHIB)是通过受限纵向数据分析估算出来的。GMC比值的95%置信区间(CI)下限≥0.67即为非劣效性:在参加研究的 333 名婴儿中,共有 327 名被纳入按协议分析。Vaxelis 组(n = 152)用药 1 次后的抗 Hib GMC 为 0.41 µg/mL (95% CI 0.33-0.52),PedvaxHIB 组(n = 146)用药 1 次后的抗 Hib GMC 为 0.39 µg/mL (95% CI 0.31-0.50)。受限纵向数据分析的 GMC 比值为 1.03(95% CI 0.76-1.39):结论:Vaxelis第一剂后的免疫原性不劣于PedvaxHIB。我们的研究结果支持将 Vaxelis 用于 Hib 患病风险较高的亚裔美国人/印第安人儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信