Validation and reliability of the Turkish version of the composite autonomic symptom score 31.

IF 2.7 4区医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1007/s10072-024-07776-2

Enes Efe Is, Selda Ciftci Inceoglu, Suleyman Caglar Tekin, Busra Albayrak, Mehmet Rasih Sonsoz, Banu Kuran, Wolfgang Singer

{"title":"Validation and reliability of the Turkish version of the composite autonomic symptom score 31.","authors":"Enes Efe Is, Selda Ciftci Inceoglu, Suleyman Caglar Tekin, Busra Albayrak, Mehmet Rasih Sonsoz, Banu Kuran, Wolfgang Singer","doi":"10.1007/s10072-024-07776-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to validate a Turkish version of the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 (T-COMPASS 31) for assessing autonomic dysfunction.Patients and methods: The COMPASS 31 questionnaire was translated into Turkish following a rigorous protocol. Forty-five patients with autonomic dysfunction symptoms related to their primary disease and 45 healthy controls matched for age and sex participated in the study. All participants completed the T-COMPASS 31 twice, with a six-week interval between administrations.Results: The T-COMPASS 31 demonstrated strong test-retest reliability, with scores remaining consistent upon retesting. Internal consistency analysis yielded high scores, indicating the questionnaire's effectiveness in accurately measuring autonomic dysfunction. Patients with autonomic dysfunction had significantly higher T-COMPASS 31 scores compared to healthy controls, thus supporting the validity of the T-COMPASS 31 as a tool for detecting this condition.Conclusion: This study successfully validated the T-COMPASS 31, establishing it as a reliable and accurate method for assessing autonomic dysfunction in Turkish-speaking populations.","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"5779-5786"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07776-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to validate a Turkish version of the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 (T-COMPASS 31) for assessing autonomic dysfunction.

Patients and methods: The COMPASS 31 questionnaire was translated into Turkish following a rigorous protocol. Forty-five patients with autonomic dysfunction symptoms related to their primary disease and 45 healthy controls matched for age and sex participated in the study. All participants completed the T-COMPASS 31 twice, with a six-week interval between administrations.

Results: The T-COMPASS 31 demonstrated strong test-retest reliability, with scores remaining consistent upon retesting. Internal consistency analysis yielded high scores, indicating the questionnaire's effectiveness in accurately measuring autonomic dysfunction. Patients with autonomic dysfunction had significantly higher T-COMPASS 31 scores compared to healthy controls, thus supporting the validity of the T-COMPASS 31 as a tool for detecting this condition.

Conclusion: This study successfully validated the T-COMPASS 31, establishing it as a reliable and accurate method for assessing autonomic dysfunction in Turkish-speaking populations.

查看原文本刊更多论文

土耳其版自律神经症状综合评分的有效性和可靠性 31.

研究目的本研究旨在验证土耳其语版的自律神经症状综合评分 31（T-COMPASS 31），以评估自律神经功能紊乱：COMPASS 31问卷按照严格的协议翻译成土耳其语。45 名患有与原发性疾病相关的自主神经功能紊乱症状的患者和 45 名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照者参加了研究。所有参与者都完成了两次 T-COMPASS 31，两次调查之间间隔六周：结果：T-COMPASS 31 显示出很强的重测可靠性，重测时得分保持一致。内部一致性分析得出的高分表明，该问卷能有效准确地测量自律神经功能紊乱。与健康对照组相比，自律神经功能紊乱患者的 T-COMPASS 31 得分明显更高，因此支持 T-COMPASS 31 作为检测自律神经功能紊乱的工具的有效性：本研究成功验证了 T-COMPASS 31，使其成为评估土耳其语人群自律神经功能紊乱的可靠而准确的方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学

CiteScore

6.10

自引率

3.00%

发文量

743

审稿时长

4 months

期刊介绍： Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.