Integration of Palliative Care in Neurosurgical Critical Care : Insights from a Single-Center Perspective.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nam Hee Kim, Yejin Kim, Se Yeon Kim, Hyoung Suk Han, Hye Yoon Park, Eun Jin Ha, Shin Hye Yoo
{"title":"Integration of Palliative Care in Neurosurgical Critical Care : Insights from a Single-Center Perspective.","authors":"Nam Hee Kim, Yejin Kim, Se Yeon Kim, Hyoung Suk Han, Hye Yoon Park, Eun Jin Ha, Shin Hye Yoo","doi":"10.3340/jkns.2024.0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Palliative care is a specialized approach designed to enhance the quality of life for both patients and their families, offering patient-centered care through comprehensive assessment and care planning. However, the integration of palliative care within neuro-critical care settings has been relatively understudied. This descriptive study aims to identify the characteristics, palliative care needs, and outcomes of patients referred to palliative care services during admission to the neurosurgical intensive care unit (NS-ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of adults admitted to the NS-ICU at a referral hospital between December 2019 and December 2021 was conducted. The study focused on those referred to the inpatient palliative care team with diagnoses of non-traumatic brain hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, or brain neoplasm. Excluded were patients who died before palliative care consultation or lacked sufficient information. The investigation assessed demographic and clinical characteristics at consultation, along with post-consultation hospital outcomes derived from medical records and interview notes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study involving 38 enrolled patients, the median age was 65, with 42.1% females. The most prevalent diagnosis was non-traumatic brain hemorrhage (47.4%). Reasons for palliative care consultation included psychosocial support (95%), goal-of-care discussions (68%), decision-making support (50%), and communication facilitation (39%). The median time from NS-ICU admission to consultation was 3.5 days (range: 1-8 days), and all interviews involved family members. Key decision topics encompassed mechanical ventilation (23.7%) and tracheostomy (21.1%). Patient preferences for life-sustaining treatment could be estimated in only 47.4% of cases, often resulting in treatment disagreement. Among the 38 patients, 26 (68.4%) died during admission. Before the consultation, full code status, partial code status, and comfort care alone were reported as 32%, 66%, and 2%, respectively; post-consultation, these figures shifted to 11%, 42%, and 47%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Palliative care was predominantly sought for psychosocial support and discussions concerning goals of care. Despite challenges in ascertaining patient treatment preferences, palliative care consultations proved invaluable in aiding family members and facilitating treatment decision-making. Our study suggests the potential integration of palliative care within neuro-critical care, contributing to a heightened utilization of comfort care at the end-of-life.</p>","PeriodicalId":16283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2024.0065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Palliative care is a specialized approach designed to enhance the quality of life for both patients and their families, offering patient-centered care through comprehensive assessment and care planning. However, the integration of palliative care within neuro-critical care settings has been relatively understudied. This descriptive study aims to identify the characteristics, palliative care needs, and outcomes of patients referred to palliative care services during admission to the neurosurgical intensive care unit (NS-ICU).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of adults admitted to the NS-ICU at a referral hospital between December 2019 and December 2021 was conducted. The study focused on those referred to the inpatient palliative care team with diagnoses of non-traumatic brain hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, or brain neoplasm. Excluded were patients who died before palliative care consultation or lacked sufficient information. The investigation assessed demographic and clinical characteristics at consultation, along with post-consultation hospital outcomes derived from medical records and interview notes.

Results: In this study involving 38 enrolled patients, the median age was 65, with 42.1% females. The most prevalent diagnosis was non-traumatic brain hemorrhage (47.4%). Reasons for palliative care consultation included psychosocial support (95%), goal-of-care discussions (68%), decision-making support (50%), and communication facilitation (39%). The median time from NS-ICU admission to consultation was 3.5 days (range: 1-8 days), and all interviews involved family members. Key decision topics encompassed mechanical ventilation (23.7%) and tracheostomy (21.1%). Patient preferences for life-sustaining treatment could be estimated in only 47.4% of cases, often resulting in treatment disagreement. Among the 38 patients, 26 (68.4%) died during admission. Before the consultation, full code status, partial code status, and comfort care alone were reported as 32%, 66%, and 2%, respectively; post-consultation, these figures shifted to 11%, 42%, and 47%, respectively.

Conclusion: Palliative care was predominantly sought for psychosocial support and discussions concerning goals of care. Despite challenges in ascertaining patient treatment preferences, palliative care consultations proved invaluable in aiding family members and facilitating treatment decision-making. Our study suggests the potential integration of palliative care within neuro-critical care, contributing to a heightened utilization of comfort care at the end-of-life.

神经外科重症监护中的姑息治疗整合 :单中心视角的启示。
目的:姑息治疗是一种旨在提高患者及其家属生活质量的专业方法,通过综合评估和护理计划提供以患者为中心的护理。然而,在神经重症监护环境中整合姑息关怀的研究相对较少。这项描述性研究旨在确定在神经外科重症监护病房(NS-ICU)住院期间转介至姑息关怀服务的患者的特征、姑息关怀需求和疗效:对一家转诊医院在2019年12月至2021年12月期间入住神经外科重症监护病房(NS-ICU)的成人患者进行了回顾性分析。研究的重点是那些被诊断为非创伤性脑出血、创伤性脑损伤或脑肿瘤并转诊至住院姑息治疗团队的患者。姑息治疗咨询前死亡或缺乏足够信息的患者不在研究范围内。调查评估了就诊时的人口统计学特征和临床特征,以及从医疗记录和访谈记录中得出的就诊后的住院结果:在这项涉及 38 名登记患者的研究中,年龄中位数为 65 岁,女性占 42.1%。最常见的诊断是非创伤性脑出血(47.4%)。姑息治疗咨询的原因包括社会心理支持(95%)、护理目标讨论(68%)、决策支持(50%)和沟通促进(39%)。从NS-ICU入院到咨询的中位时间为3.5天(范围:1-8天),所有访谈均有家属参与。关键决策主题包括机械通气(23.7%)和气管切开术(21.1%)。仅有 47.4% 的病例能估计出患者对维持生命治疗的偏好,这往往导致治疗分歧。38 名患者中有 26 人(68.4%)在入院期间死亡。会诊前,完全代码状态、部分代码状态和单纯舒适护理的比例分别为32%、66%和2%;会诊后,这些数字分别变为11%、42%和47%:姑息关怀主要是为了提供心理支持和讨论护理目标。尽管在确定患者治疗偏好方面存在挑战,但姑息关怀会诊在帮助家庭成员和促进治疗决策方面证明是非常有价值的。我们的研究表明,姑息治疗有可能与神经重症护理相结合,从而提高临终关怀的利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society (J Korean Neurosurg Soc) is the official journal of the Korean Neurosurgical Society, and published bimonthly (1st day of January, March, May, July, September, and November). It launched in October 31, 1972 with Volume 1 and Number 1. J Korean Neurosurg Soc aims to allow neurosurgeons from around the world to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism. This journal publishes Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Case Reports, Technical Notes, and Letters to the Editor. Our field of interest involves clinical neurosurgery (cerebrovascular disease, neuro-oncology, skull base neurosurgery, spine, pediatric neurosurgery, functional neurosurgery, epilepsy, neuro-trauma, and peripheral nerve disease) and laboratory work in neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信