Response and conflict expectations shape motor responses interactively.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1007/s00221-024-06920-w
Annika E Sauter, Adam Zabicki, Thomas Schüller, Juan Carlos Baldermann, Gereon R Fink, Paola Mengotti, Simone Vossel
{"title":"Response and conflict expectations shape motor responses interactively.","authors":"Annika E Sauter, Adam Zabicki, Thomas Schüller, Juan Carlos Baldermann, Gereon R Fink, Paola Mengotti, Simone Vossel","doi":"10.1007/s00221-024-06920-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efficient responses in dynamic environments rely on a combination of readiness and flexibility, regulated by anticipatory and online response control mechanisms. The latter are required when a motor response needs to be reprogrammed or when flanker stimuli induce response conflict and they are crucially modulated by anticipatory signals such as response and conflict expectations. The mutual influence and interplay of these control processes remain to be elucidated. Our behavioral study employed a novel combined response cueing/conflict task designed to test for interactive effects of response reprogramming and conflict resolution and their modulation by expectations. To this end, valid and invalid response cues were combined with congruent and incongruent target flankers. Expectations were modulated by systematically manipulating the proportions of valid versus invalid cues and congruent versus incongruent flanker stimuli in different task blocks. Reaction time and accuracy were assessed in thirty-one healthy volunteers. The results revealed response reprogramming and conflict resolution interactions for both behavioral measures, modulated by response and conflict expectations. Accuracy decreased disproportionally when invalidly cued targets with incongruent flankers were least expected. These findings support coordinated and partially overlapping anticipatory and online response control mechanisms within motor-cognitive networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"2599-2612"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11527934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06920-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efficient responses in dynamic environments rely on a combination of readiness and flexibility, regulated by anticipatory and online response control mechanisms. The latter are required when a motor response needs to be reprogrammed or when flanker stimuli induce response conflict and they are crucially modulated by anticipatory signals such as response and conflict expectations. The mutual influence and interplay of these control processes remain to be elucidated. Our behavioral study employed a novel combined response cueing/conflict task designed to test for interactive effects of response reprogramming and conflict resolution and their modulation by expectations. To this end, valid and invalid response cues were combined with congruent and incongruent target flankers. Expectations were modulated by systematically manipulating the proportions of valid versus invalid cues and congruent versus incongruent flanker stimuli in different task blocks. Reaction time and accuracy were assessed in thirty-one healthy volunteers. The results revealed response reprogramming and conflict resolution interactions for both behavioral measures, modulated by response and conflict expectations. Accuracy decreased disproportionally when invalidly cued targets with incongruent flankers were least expected. These findings support coordinated and partially overlapping anticipatory and online response control mechanisms within motor-cognitive networks.

反应和冲突预期相互作用,形成运动反应。
动态环境中的高效反应依赖于准备性和灵活性的结合,并受预期和在线反应控制机制的调节。当运动反应需要重新编程或侧翼刺激引起反应冲突时,就需要在线反应控制机制,而在线反应控制机制受到反应预期和冲突预期等预期信号的重要调节。这些控制过程之间的相互影响和相互作用仍有待阐明。我们的行为研究采用了一种新颖的反应提示/冲突组合任务,旨在测试反应重编程和冲突解决的交互作用及其受预期的调节。为此,我们将有效和无效的反应线索与一致和不一致的目标侧翼结合起来。在不同的任务块中,通过系统地操纵有效与无效线索的比例,以及一致与不一致侧翼刺激物的比例来调节预期。对 31 名健康志愿者的反应时间和准确性进行了评估。结果显示,在两种行为测量中,反应重编程和冲突解决之间存在相互作用,并受反应和冲突预期的调节。当无效提示目标的侧翼不一致时,准确率会不成比例地下降。这些发现支持了运动认知网络中协调和部分重叠的预期和在线反应控制机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信