The effect of caffeine chewing gum on muscle performance and fatigue after severe-intensity exercise: isometric vs. dynamic assessments in trained cyclists.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Eduardo Marcel Fernandes Nascimento, Fernando Klitzke Borszcz, Thiago Pereira Ventura, Benedito Sérgio Denadai, Luiz Guilherme Antonacci Guglielmo, Ricardo Dantas de Lucas
{"title":"The effect of caffeine chewing gum on muscle performance and fatigue after severe-intensity exercise: isometric vs. dynamic assessments in trained cyclists.","authors":"Eduardo Marcel Fernandes Nascimento, Fernando Klitzke Borszcz, Thiago Pereira Ventura, Benedito Sérgio Denadai, Luiz Guilherme Antonacci Guglielmo, Ricardo Dantas de Lucas","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05617-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the effect of caffeinated chewing gum (GUM<sub>CAF</sub>) on muscle fatigue (isometric vs. dynamic) after severe-intensity cycling bouts. Fifteen trained male cyclists participated in four visits. Each visit involved two severe-intensity cycling bouts (Δ<sub>1</sub> and Δ<sub>2</sub>) lasting 6 min, separated by a 5-min recovery period. Muscle fatigue was assessed by isometric maximal voluntary knee extension contraction (IMVC) with twitch interpolation technique and dynamically by 7 s all-out cycling sprints. Assessments were performed before GUM<sub>CAF</sub> (Pre-GUM) and after the cycling bouts (Post-Exercise). GUM<sub>CAF</sub> and placebo gum (GUM<sub>PLA</sub>) were administered in a randomized double-blind procedure with participants receiving each gum type (GUM<sub>CAF</sub> and GUM<sub>PLA</sub>) during two separate visits. The results showed no significant interaction between gum types and time for the isometric and dynamic measurements (p > 0.05). The percentage change in performance from Pre-GUM to Post-Exercise showed no significant difference between GUM<sub>CAF</sub> and GUM<sub>PLA</sub> for either the dynamic-derived T<sub>MAX</sub> (~ -17.8% and -15.1%, respectively; p = 0.551) or isometric IMVC (~ -12.3% and -17.7%, respectively; p = 0.091) measurements. Moderate to large correlations (r = 0.31-0.51) were found between changes in sprint maximal torque and maximal power output measurements and isometric force, for both gum conditions. GUM<sub>CAF</sub> was not effective in attenuating muscle force decline triggered by severe-intensity cycling exercises, as measured by both isometric and dynamic methods. The correlations between IMVC and cycling maximal torque and power output suggest caution when interpreting isometric force as a direct measure of fatigue during dynamic cycling exercises.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05617-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of caffeinated chewing gum (GUMCAF) on muscle fatigue (isometric vs. dynamic) after severe-intensity cycling bouts. Fifteen trained male cyclists participated in four visits. Each visit involved two severe-intensity cycling bouts (Δ1 and Δ2) lasting 6 min, separated by a 5-min recovery period. Muscle fatigue was assessed by isometric maximal voluntary knee extension contraction (IMVC) with twitch interpolation technique and dynamically by 7 s all-out cycling sprints. Assessments were performed before GUMCAF (Pre-GUM) and after the cycling bouts (Post-Exercise). GUMCAF and placebo gum (GUMPLA) were administered in a randomized double-blind procedure with participants receiving each gum type (GUMCAF and GUMPLA) during two separate visits. The results showed no significant interaction between gum types and time for the isometric and dynamic measurements (p > 0.05). The percentage change in performance from Pre-GUM to Post-Exercise showed no significant difference between GUMCAF and GUMPLA for either the dynamic-derived TMAX (~ -17.8% and -15.1%, respectively; p = 0.551) or isometric IMVC (~ -12.3% and -17.7%, respectively; p = 0.091) measurements. Moderate to large correlations (r = 0.31-0.51) were found between changes in sprint maximal torque and maximal power output measurements and isometric force, for both gum conditions. GUMCAF was not effective in attenuating muscle force decline triggered by severe-intensity cycling exercises, as measured by both isometric and dynamic methods. The correlations between IMVC and cycling maximal torque and power output suggest caution when interpreting isometric force as a direct measure of fatigue during dynamic cycling exercises.

咖啡因口香糖对剧烈运动后肌肉表现和疲劳的影响:对训练有素的自行车运动员进行等长和动态评估。
本研究调查了含咖啡因口香糖(GUMCAF)对高强度自行车运动后肌肉疲劳(等长与动态)的影响。15 名训练有素的男性自行车运动员参加了四次考察。每次考察包括两次持续 6 分钟的高强度自行车运动(Δ1 和 Δ2),中间有 5 分钟的恢复期。肌肉疲劳通过等距最大自主伸膝收缩(IMVC)和抽动插值技术进行评估,并通过 7 秒全力骑车冲刺进行动态评估。评估在使用 GUMCAF 前(GUMCAF 前)和骑车后(骑车后)进行。GUMCAF 和安慰剂口香糖(GUMPLA)采用随机双盲法,参与者在两次不同的访问中分别接受两种口香糖(GUMCAF 和 GUMPLA)。结果显示,在等长和动态测量中,口香糖类型与时间之间没有明显的交互作用(P > 0.05)。从运动前到运动后的成绩百分比变化显示,GUMCAF 和 GUMPLA 在动态衍生 TMAX(分别为 -17.8% 和 -15.1%;p = 0.551)或等长 IMVC(分别为 -12.3% 和 -17.7%;p = 0.091)测量方面均无显著差异。在两种口香糖条件下,冲刺最大扭矩和最大功率输出测量值的变化与等长力之间存在中度到较大的相关性(r = 0.31-0.51)。根据等长和动态方法的测量,GUMCAF 并不能有效地减轻高强度骑行运动引起的肌肉力量下降。IMVC 与骑车最大扭矩和功率输出之间的相关性表明,在将等长肌力作为动态骑车运动中疲劳的直接测量指标时应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信