Source identification and human exposure assessment of organophosphate flame retardants and plasticisers in soil and outdoor dust from Nigerian e-waste dismantling and dumpsites.

IF 7.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Pollution Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124998
Bilikis T Folarin, Giulia Poma, Shanshan Yin, Jorgelina C Altamirano, Paulien Cleys, Temilola Oluseyi, Adrian Covaci
{"title":"Source identification and human exposure assessment of organophosphate flame retardants and plasticisers in soil and outdoor dust from Nigerian e-waste dismantling and dumpsites.","authors":"Bilikis T Folarin, Giulia Poma, Shanshan Yin, Jorgelina C Altamirano, Paulien Cleys, Temilola Oluseyi, Adrian Covaci","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electronic waste (e-waste) dismantling and dumpsite processes are major sources of organophosphate flame retardant and plasticiser emissions and may pose potentially adverse effects on environment and human health. In 20 outdoor dust and 49 soil samples collected from four e-waste dismantling and three e-waste dumpsites in two States of Nigeria (Lagos and Ogun), we identified 13 alternative plasticisers (APs), 7 legacy phthalate plasticisers (LPs), and 17 organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs) for the first time in African e-waste streams. In the samples from dismantling sites, the range (median) concentrations of ∑<sub>13</sub>APs, ∑<sub>7</sub>LPs, and ∑<sub>17</sub>OPFRs were 11-2747 μg/g (144 μg/g), 11-396 μg/g (125 μg/g), and 0.2-68 μg/g (5.5 μg), in dust respectively and 1.8-297 μg/g (55 μg/g), 1.3-274 μg/g (48.5 μg/g), and 1.6-62 μg/g (1.6 μg/g), in soil respectively. Results for soil samples from e-waste dumpsites were (6.6-195 μg/g (23.7 μg/g), 6.0-295 μg/g (54.8), and 0.4-42.3 μg/g (9.0 μg/g) for ∑<sub>13</sub>APs, ∑<sub>7</sub>LPs, and ∑<sub>17</sub>OPFRs respectively. Overall, concentrations of APs were significantly higher at the dismantling sites (p = 0.005) compared to dumpsites, levels of LPs were higher at dismantling sites but not significant, while OPFR concentrations were significantly higher in dumpsite samples (p = 0.005). Plasticisers were found to be major contributors to pollution at e-waste dismantling sites, while OPFRs were associated with both automobile dismantling and e-waste dumpsite processes. Following particle size fractionation of selected soil samples, higher concentrations of targeted compounds were observed in the smaller mesh (180 μm) soil sieve fraction. For dust, the total median estimated daily intake via ingestion and dermal adsorption (EDI<sub>ing</sub> and EDI<sub>derm</sub>) ranged from 43 to 74 ng/kg bw/day and 0.4-0.7 ng/kg bw/day, respectively. Correspondingly, 4.6-45 ng/kg bw/day and 0.015-0.57 ng/kg bw/day were the values found for soil, respectively. According to these results, the targeted chemicals do not appear to pose a non-carcinogenic risk to e-waste workers through ingestion or dermal contact of bio-accessible fractions of the chemicals. Human biomonitoring campaigns are recommended in the Nigerian e-waste environment considering the elevated concentration levels found for the majority of targeted compounds and that risk parameters required for exposure assessment were only available for a limited number of compounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124998","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electronic waste (e-waste) dismantling and dumpsite processes are major sources of organophosphate flame retardant and plasticiser emissions and may pose potentially adverse effects on environment and human health. In 20 outdoor dust and 49 soil samples collected from four e-waste dismantling and three e-waste dumpsites in two States of Nigeria (Lagos and Ogun), we identified 13 alternative plasticisers (APs), 7 legacy phthalate plasticisers (LPs), and 17 organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs) for the first time in African e-waste streams. In the samples from dismantling sites, the range (median) concentrations of ∑13APs, ∑7LPs, and ∑17OPFRs were 11-2747 μg/g (144 μg/g), 11-396 μg/g (125 μg/g), and 0.2-68 μg/g (5.5 μg), in dust respectively and 1.8-297 μg/g (55 μg/g), 1.3-274 μg/g (48.5 μg/g), and 1.6-62 μg/g (1.6 μg/g), in soil respectively. Results for soil samples from e-waste dumpsites were (6.6-195 μg/g (23.7 μg/g), 6.0-295 μg/g (54.8), and 0.4-42.3 μg/g (9.0 μg/g) for ∑13APs, ∑7LPs, and ∑17OPFRs respectively. Overall, concentrations of APs were significantly higher at the dismantling sites (p = 0.005) compared to dumpsites, levels of LPs were higher at dismantling sites but not significant, while OPFR concentrations were significantly higher in dumpsite samples (p = 0.005). Plasticisers were found to be major contributors to pollution at e-waste dismantling sites, while OPFRs were associated with both automobile dismantling and e-waste dumpsite processes. Following particle size fractionation of selected soil samples, higher concentrations of targeted compounds were observed in the smaller mesh (180 μm) soil sieve fraction. For dust, the total median estimated daily intake via ingestion and dermal adsorption (EDIing and EDIderm) ranged from 43 to 74 ng/kg bw/day and 0.4-0.7 ng/kg bw/day, respectively. Correspondingly, 4.6-45 ng/kg bw/day and 0.015-0.57 ng/kg bw/day were the values found for soil, respectively. According to these results, the targeted chemicals do not appear to pose a non-carcinogenic risk to e-waste workers through ingestion or dermal contact of bio-accessible fractions of the chemicals. Human biomonitoring campaigns are recommended in the Nigerian e-waste environment considering the elevated concentration levels found for the majority of targeted compounds and that risk parameters required for exposure assessment were only available for a limited number of compounds.

尼日利亚电子废物拆解和倾倒场的土壤和室外灰尘中有机磷阻燃剂和增塑剂的来源识别和人体暴露评估。
电子废物(e-waste)拆解和倾倒过程是有机磷阻燃剂和增塑剂排放的主要来源,可能对环境和人类健康造成潜在的不利影响。我们从尼日利亚两个州(拉各斯州和奥贡州)的四个电子废物拆解场和三个电子废物倾倒场采集了 20 个室外灰尘样本和 49 个土壤样本,首次在非洲电子废物流中发现了 13 种替代增塑剂 (AP)、7 种传统邻苯二甲酸酯增塑剂 (LP) 和 17 种有机磷阻燃剂 (OPFR)。在来自拆解现场的样本中,∑13APs、∑7LPs 和 ∑17OPFRs 的浓度范围(中位数)分别为 11 至 2747 微克/克(144 微克/克)、11 至 396 微克/克(125 微克/克)和 0.在灰尘中的浓度分别为 2 至 68 微克/克(5.5 微克),在土壤中的浓度分别为 1.8 至 297 微克/克(55 微克/克)、1.3 至 274 微克/克(48.5 微克/克)和 1.6 至 62 微克/克(1.6 微克/克)。电子废物倾倒场的土壤样本中,∑13APs、∑7LPs 和 ∑17OPFRs的含量分别为 6.6 至 195 μg/g(23.7 μg/g)、6.0 至 295 μg/g(54.8 μg/g)和 0.4 至 42.3 μg/g(9.0 μg/g)。总体而言,与倾倒场相比,拆解场的 APs 浓度明显更高(p = 0.005),拆解场的 LPs 含量更高,但不显著,而倾倒场样本的 OPFR 浓度明显更高(p = 0.005)。研究发现,塑化剂是造成电子废物拆解场污染的主要因素,而 OPFR 则与汽车拆解和电子废物倾倒场过程有关。在对选定的土壤样本进行粒度分馏后,发现较小筛孔(180 微米)的土壤样本中目标化合物的浓度较高。对于粉尘,通过摄入和皮肤吸附(EDIing 和 EDIderm)估计的日摄入量中值分别为 43 至 74 纳克/千克体重/天和 0.4 至 0.7 纳克/千克体重/天。相应地,土壤中的数值分别为 4.6 至 45 纳克/千克体重/天和 0.015 至 0.57 纳克/千克体重/天。根据这些结果,目标化学品似乎不会对电子废物工人通过摄入或皮肤接触生物可接触部分的化学品造成非致癌风险。考虑到大多数目标化合物的浓度水平较高,而且只有有限的几种化合物可以获得接触评估所需的风险参数,建议在尼日利亚的电子废物环境中开展人体生物监测活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2082
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: • Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies; • Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change; • Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest; • New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信