{"title":"Beginning teachers’ descriptions of ball games as pedagogic practice in Swedish physical education","authors":"Jan Mustell","doi":"10.1177/1356336x241280841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teaching approaches in ball games in school physical education (PE) have traditionally focused on technical proficiency. Technical approaches have been criticised for being teacher-centred, exclusive, and lacking meaning. Game-based approaches (GBAs) have been presented as an alternative way to teach ball games. Employing GBAs is, however, not without challenges. Scholars have pointed to teachers’ limited content knowledge of games, their poor understanding of GBAs, and cultural expectations of ball games as factors that constrain teachers’ work with GBAs. The aim of this article is to provide an understanding of how beginning teachers describe ball games as a pedagogic practice in Swedish PE. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 beginning teachers who had graduated from two physical education teacher education (PETE) institutions. Bernstein's concepts of classification and framing were used to analyse the teachers’ descriptions of pedagogic practice. The findings illustrate how the classification of ball games knowledge varies. Some of the beginning teachers aimed to develop pupils’ understanding of games while others instead used ball games as a means for developing general movement capability or cooperation. Ball games teaching was characterised by a combination of GBAs and technical approaches. The influence of competitive sport outside of school was seen as a challenge, and the beginning teachers used strong framing and different teaching strategies combined with assessment to manage this challenge. The findings raise questions about ball games education in PETE in relation to specific national contexts.","PeriodicalId":47681,"journal":{"name":"European Physical Education Review","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Physical Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x241280841","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Teaching approaches in ball games in school physical education (PE) have traditionally focused on technical proficiency. Technical approaches have been criticised for being teacher-centred, exclusive, and lacking meaning. Game-based approaches (GBAs) have been presented as an alternative way to teach ball games. Employing GBAs is, however, not without challenges. Scholars have pointed to teachers’ limited content knowledge of games, their poor understanding of GBAs, and cultural expectations of ball games as factors that constrain teachers’ work with GBAs. The aim of this article is to provide an understanding of how beginning teachers describe ball games as a pedagogic practice in Swedish PE. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 beginning teachers who had graduated from two physical education teacher education (PETE) institutions. Bernstein's concepts of classification and framing were used to analyse the teachers’ descriptions of pedagogic practice. The findings illustrate how the classification of ball games knowledge varies. Some of the beginning teachers aimed to develop pupils’ understanding of games while others instead used ball games as a means for developing general movement capability or cooperation. Ball games teaching was characterised by a combination of GBAs and technical approaches. The influence of competitive sport outside of school was seen as a challenge, and the beginning teachers used strong framing and different teaching strategies combined with assessment to manage this challenge. The findings raise questions about ball games education in PETE in relation to specific national contexts.
学校体育(PE)中的球类教学方法历来侧重于技术熟练程度。技术教学法因以教师为中心、排他性和缺乏意义而受到批评。以游戏为基础的教学法(GBAs)被认为是球类教学的另一种方法。然而,采用游戏教学法并非没有挑战。有学者指出,教师对游戏内容的了解有限,对游戏教学法的理解不深,以及文化上对球类游戏的期望,都是制约教师使用游戏教学法的因素。本文旨在了解初任教师是如何将球类游戏描述为瑞典体育教学实践的。我们对 12 名毕业于两所体育师范教育(PETE)院校的新教师进行了半结构式访谈。伯恩斯坦的分类和框架概念被用来分析教师们对教学实践的描述。研究结果表明,对球类运动知识的分类各有不同。一些初任教师旨在培养学生对游戏的理解,而另一些教师则将球类游戏作为培养一般运动能力或合作能力的一种手段。球类教学的特点是综合运用一般能力培养和技术方法。校外竞技体育的影响被视为一种挑战,初任教师采用了强有力的框架和不同的教学策略,并结合评估来应对这一挑战。研究结果提出了与具体国情有关的 PETE 球类运动教育问题。
期刊介绍:
- Multidisciplinary Approaches: European Physical Education Review brings together contributions from a wide range of disciplines across the natural and social sciences and humanities. It includes theoretical and research-based articles and occasionally devotes Special Issues to major topics and themes within the field. - International Coverage: European Physical Education Review publishes contributions from Europe and all regions of the world, promoting international communication among scholars and professionals.