The Role of Digital Facebow for CAD/CAM Implant-Supported Crowns Workflow.

Lenka Vavřičková, Martin Kapitán, Jan Schmidt
{"title":"The Role of Digital Facebow for CAD/CAM Implant-Supported Crowns Workflow.","authors":"Lenka Vavřičková, Martin Kapitán, Jan Schmidt","doi":"10.14712/18059694.2024.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent advancements in digital technologies have transformed clinical workflows in dentistry, ensuring precise restorations. Custom-made crowns and fixed partial dentures (FPDs) now rely on virtual articulation. The digital facebow provides individualized data for CAD settings, streamlining the fabrication via digital workflow. For the purpose of demonstrating the differences observed during fabrication, we present a case report involving a 68-year-old patient seeking a replacement for missing teeth 24, 25, 26, and 27. The treatment plan involved the fabrication of an implant-supported FPD using monolithic zirconia (ZrO2). However, technical hurdles emerged during the planning phase, primarily due to spatial limitations posing a risk of mechanical failure over time. Consequently, we pivoted approach towards a porcelain fused to metal (PFM) FPD. For the PFM FPD, individual values from the digital facebow adjusted both virtual and conventional articulators. For comparison, two ZrO2 FPDs were milled-individual settings and average settings. All restorations underwent assessment for occlusion in maximal intercuspal position and eccentric mandible movements. In conclusion, the case report showed that individualized PFM FPD required minimal adjustments compared to milled ZrO2 restorations, whether using individual or average values. Utilizing individual values from the digital facebow reduced operator working time and minimized the intraoral adjustments.</p>","PeriodicalId":101400,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica (Hradec Kralove)","volume":"67 1","pages":"26-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica (Hradec Kralove)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2024.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advancements in digital technologies have transformed clinical workflows in dentistry, ensuring precise restorations. Custom-made crowns and fixed partial dentures (FPDs) now rely on virtual articulation. The digital facebow provides individualized data for CAD settings, streamlining the fabrication via digital workflow. For the purpose of demonstrating the differences observed during fabrication, we present a case report involving a 68-year-old patient seeking a replacement for missing teeth 24, 25, 26, and 27. The treatment plan involved the fabrication of an implant-supported FPD using monolithic zirconia (ZrO2). However, technical hurdles emerged during the planning phase, primarily due to spatial limitations posing a risk of mechanical failure over time. Consequently, we pivoted approach towards a porcelain fused to metal (PFM) FPD. For the PFM FPD, individual values from the digital facebow adjusted both virtual and conventional articulators. For comparison, two ZrO2 FPDs were milled-individual settings and average settings. All restorations underwent assessment for occlusion in maximal intercuspal position and eccentric mandible movements. In conclusion, the case report showed that individualized PFM FPD required minimal adjustments compared to milled ZrO2 restorations, whether using individual or average values. Utilizing individual values from the digital facebow reduced operator working time and minimized the intraoral adjustments.

数字化 Facebow 在 CAD/CAM 种植体支持冠工作流程中的作用。
数字技术的最新进展改变了牙科临床工作流程,确保了精确修复。定制牙冠和固定局部义齿(FPD)现在依赖于虚拟衔接。数字化面弓为 CAD 设置提供了个性化数据,通过数字化工作流程简化了制作过程。为了展示制作过程中观察到的差异,我们提交了一份病例报告,涉及一名 68 岁的患者,他希望替换缺失的第 24、25、26 和 27 颗牙齿。治疗计划包括使用整体氧化锆(ZrO2)制作种植体支持的 FPD。然而,在计划阶段出现了技术障碍,主要是由于空间限制,随着时间的推移有可能出现机械故障。因此,我们转而采用瓷熔金属(PFM)FPD。对于 PFM FPD,来自数字化面弓的单个数值调整了虚拟和传统的关节器。为了进行比较,我们研磨了两个二氧化锆FPD--单个设置和平均设置。所有修复体均接受了最大颌间位置和下颌偏心运动的咬合评估。总之,病例报告显示,与研磨的二氧化锆修复体相比,无论是使用个体值还是平均值,个体化的PFM FPD所需的调整都很小。使用数字面弓中的单个值减少了操作者的工作时间,并将口内调整减至最少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信