Thermodynamic limits of the depolymerization of poly(olefin)s using mechanochemistry†

Yuchen Chang, Van Son Nguyen, Adrian H. Hergesell, Claire L. Seitzinger, Jan Meisner, Ina Vollmer, F. Joseph Schork and Carsten Sievers
{"title":"Thermodynamic limits of the depolymerization of poly(olefin)s using mechanochemistry†","authors":"Yuchen Chang, Van Son Nguyen, Adrian H. Hergesell, Claire L. Seitzinger, Jan Meisner, Ina Vollmer, F. Joseph Schork and Carsten Sievers","doi":"10.1039/D4MR00079J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Mechanochemistry is a promising approach for chemical recycling of commodity plastics, and in some cases depolymerization to the monomer(s) has been reported. However, while poly(olefin)s comprise the largest share of global commodity plastics, mechanochemical depolymerization of these polymers in standard laboratory-scale ball mill reactors suffers from slow rates. In this work, the observed reactivities of poly(styrene), poly(ethylene) and poly(propylene) are rationalized on the basis of thermodynamic limitations of their depolymerization by depropagation of free radical intermediates. In addition, subsequent phase partitioning equilibria for the removal of monomers from the reactor <em>via</em> a purge gas stream are discussed for these polymers. For poly(styrene), a typical vibratory ball mill supplies just enough energy for its depolymerization to be driven by either thermal hotspots or adiabatic compression of the impact site, but the same energy supply is far from sufficient for poly(propylene) and poly(ethylene). Meanwhile, removal of styrene from the reactor is thermodynamically hindered by its lower volatility, but this is not an issue for either propylene or ethylene. The implications of these thermodynamic limitations for mechanochemical reactor design and potential for mechanocatalytic processes are highlighted.</p>","PeriodicalId":101140,"journal":{"name":"RSC Mechanochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11388944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC Mechanochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/mr/d4mr00079j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mechanochemistry is a promising approach for chemical recycling of commodity plastics, and in some cases depolymerization to the monomer(s) has been reported. However, while poly(olefin)s comprise the largest share of global commodity plastics, mechanochemical depolymerization of these polymers in standard laboratory-scale ball mill reactors suffers from slow rates. In this work, the observed reactivities of poly(styrene), poly(ethylene) and poly(propylene) are rationalized on the basis of thermodynamic limitations of their depolymerization by depropagation of free radical intermediates. In addition, subsequent phase partitioning equilibria for the removal of monomers from the reactor via a purge gas stream are discussed for these polymers. For poly(styrene), a typical vibratory ball mill supplies just enough energy for its depolymerization to be driven by either thermal hotspots or adiabatic compression of the impact site, but the same energy supply is far from sufficient for poly(propylene) and poly(ethylene). Meanwhile, removal of styrene from the reactor is thermodynamically hindered by its lower volatility, but this is not an issue for either propylene or ethylene. The implications of these thermodynamic limitations for mechanochemical reactor design and potential for mechanocatalytic processes are highlighted.

Abstract Image

利用机械化学法解聚聚(烯烃)的热力学极限。
机械化学是一种很有前景的商品塑料化学回收方法,在某些情况下,已经有将其解聚为单体的报道。然而,虽然聚(烯烃)在全球商品塑料中所占的份额最大,但在标准实验室规模的球磨反应器中,这些聚合物的机械化学解聚速度很慢。在这项工作中,根据自由基中间体解聚的热力学限制,对观察到的聚苯乙烯、聚乙烯和聚丙烯的反应活性进行了合理解释。此外,还讨论了这些聚合物通过清洗气流从反应器中去除单体的后续相分配平衡。对于聚(苯乙烯)来说,典型的振动球磨机提供的能量足以使其在热热点或冲击部位的绝热压缩作用下解聚,但对于聚(丙烯)和聚(乙烯)来说,同样的能量供应远远不够。同时,由于苯乙烯的挥发性较低,从反应器中清除苯乙烯会受到热力学限制,但这对丙烯或乙烯来说都不是问题。这些热力学限制对机械化学反应器设计和机械催化工艺潜力的影响得到了强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信