Comparison of two different preload targets of stroke volume variation during kidney transplantation: a randomised controlled trial.

Seong-Mi Yang, Seung Eun Song, Ji-Yoon Jung, Jae-Woo Ju, Jin Young Sohn, Ho-Jin Lee, Won Ho Kim
{"title":"Comparison of two different preload targets of stroke volume variation during kidney transplantation: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Seong-Mi Yang, Seung Eun Song, Ji-Yoon Jung, Jae-Woo Ju, Jin Young Sohn, Ho-Jin Lee, Won Ho Kim","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2023-150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maintaining adequate preload during kidney transplantation (KT) is important for graft function. We evaluated whether a high or low normal target for a dynamic preload index of stroke volume variation (SVV) would impact graft function during living donor KT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared haemodynamic management algorithms using two different targets of SVV: SVV6% group (n = 30) versus SVV12% group (n = 30). Crystalloids were administered to achieve SVV less than the assigned target. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) level at the end of surgery was compared. We also compared the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), daily serum creatinine level and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) until 2 weeks postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total amount of crystalloids administered was significantly different between the SVV6% and SVV12% groups (median [interquartile range] 2,250 [1,700-3,600] vs. 1,350 [1,050-1,900], P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in NGAL level at the end of the operation between the SVV6% and SVV12% groups (395 [234-560] vs. 518 [346-654], P = 0.115). The incidence of DGF was not significantly different, and there was no significant difference in the postoperative serum creatinine levels or GFR between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our randomised trial demonstrated that an SVV target of either 6% or 12% could be adequate as a preload management target for postoperative graft function during living donor KT. However, given the low incidence of DGF in living donor KT and type II error, our study should be interpreted carefully and further studies for deceased donor KT are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":94289,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2023-150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Maintaining adequate preload during kidney transplantation (KT) is important for graft function. We evaluated whether a high or low normal target for a dynamic preload index of stroke volume variation (SVV) would impact graft function during living donor KT.

Methods: We compared haemodynamic management algorithms using two different targets of SVV: SVV6% group (n = 30) versus SVV12% group (n = 30). Crystalloids were administered to achieve SVV less than the assigned target. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) level at the end of surgery was compared. We also compared the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), daily serum creatinine level and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) until 2 weeks postoperatively.

Results: The total amount of crystalloids administered was significantly different between the SVV6% and SVV12% groups (median [interquartile range] 2,250 [1,700-3,600] vs. 1,350 [1,050-1,900], P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in NGAL level at the end of the operation between the SVV6% and SVV12% groups (395 [234-560] vs. 518 [346-654], P = 0.115). The incidence of DGF was not significantly different, and there was no significant difference in the postoperative serum creatinine levels or GFR between the groups.

Conclusions: Our randomised trial demonstrated that an SVV target of either 6% or 12% could be adequate as a preload management target for postoperative graft function during living donor KT. However, given the low incidence of DGF in living donor KT and type II error, our study should be interpreted carefully and further studies for deceased donor KT are required.

肾移植过程中两种不同前负荷目标下每搏容量变化的比较:随机对照试验。
导言:肾移植(KT)期间保持足够的前负荷对移植物功能非常重要。我们评估了搏出量变化(SVV)这一动态前负荷指标的正常目标值过高或过低是否会影响活体肾移植过程中的移植物功能:我们比较了使用两种不同 SVV 目标的血流动力学管理算法:SVV6% 组(n = 30)和 SVV12% 组(n = 30)。使用晶体液使 SVV 小于指定目标。比较了手术结束时中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质体(NGAL)的水平。我们还比较了移植功能延迟(DGF)的发生率、每日血清肌酐水平以及术后两周前的肾小球滤过率(GFR):结果:SVV6%组和SVV12%组的晶体液总用量有显著差异(中位数[四分位距]2,250 [1,700-3,600] vs. 1,350 [1,050-1,900], P <0.001)。手术结束时,SVV6% 组和 SVV12% 组的 NGAL 水平无明显差异(395 [234-560] vs. 518 [346-654],P = 0.115)。DGF的发生率无明显差异,术后血清肌酐水平或GFR在两组间也无明显差异:我们的随机试验表明,6%或12%的SVV目标可以作为活体供体KT术后移植物功能的前负荷管理目标。然而,鉴于活体供体 KT 的 DGF 发生率较低且存在 II 型误差,因此应谨慎解释我们的研究,并需要对死亡供体 KT 进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信