Self-perception of Genital Appearance following a Vaginal Delivery, C-section and Nulliparous Women in a Hispanic Population in Puerto Rico.

Puerto Rico health sciences journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01
Jeyka Marin-Alvarez, Lorena Gonzalez, Erika Benabe
{"title":"Self-perception of Genital Appearance following a Vaginal Delivery, C-section and Nulliparous Women in a Hispanic Population in Puerto Rico.","authors":"Jeyka Marin-Alvarez, Lorena Gonzalez, Erika Benabe","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Childbirth is considered to be both beautiful and traumatic. Following a vaginal delivery, some women express discontent with the appearance of their genitalia on social media and/or websites. This study explored how some women perceived their genitalia, post childbirth. Three groups were compared: women with a vaginal delivery, those with a cesarean-section, and those who had never given birth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After the study received approval from the institutional review board, 224 female participants living in Puerto Rico and aged 21 to 42 years completed a questionnaire about their genital self-image.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 51% (n = 115) of the participants had never given birth; the others had given birth via C-section 23% (n = 51) or vaginally 26% (n = 58). In all 3 groups, 84% felt positive about their genitals, 79% expressed their satisfaction with the appearance of their genitals and 84%, with their size; 81% were not ashamed of their genitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Logistic regression found no significant difference in genital self-perception between delivery groups or nulliparous women. The adjusted odds ratios for positive genital image varied slightly between delivery methods but were not statistically significant (ranging from 0.65 to 1.11 for vaginal deliveries, and 0.42 to 1.00 for C-sections; P > .05). This suggests that the method of delivery does not have a significant impact on women's genital self-perception. However, for the 21% with negative perceptions, targeted support is essential; for those struggling with their self-image after childbirth, our results can inform support services to address concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":94183,"journal":{"name":"Puerto Rico health sciences journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Puerto Rico health sciences journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Childbirth is considered to be both beautiful and traumatic. Following a vaginal delivery, some women express discontent with the appearance of their genitalia on social media and/or websites. This study explored how some women perceived their genitalia, post childbirth. Three groups were compared: women with a vaginal delivery, those with a cesarean-section, and those who had never given birth.

Methods: After the study received approval from the institutional review board, 224 female participants living in Puerto Rico and aged 21 to 42 years completed a questionnaire about their genital self-image.

Results: Approximately 51% (n = 115) of the participants had never given birth; the others had given birth via C-section 23% (n = 51) or vaginally 26% (n = 58). In all 3 groups, 84% felt positive about their genitals, 79% expressed their satisfaction with the appearance of their genitals and 84%, with their size; 81% were not ashamed of their genitals.

Conclusion: Logistic regression found no significant difference in genital self-perception between delivery groups or nulliparous women. The adjusted odds ratios for positive genital image varied slightly between delivery methods but were not statistically significant (ranging from 0.65 to 1.11 for vaginal deliveries, and 0.42 to 1.00 for C-sections; P > .05). This suggests that the method of delivery does not have a significant impact on women's genital self-perception. However, for the 21% with negative perceptions, targeted support is essential; for those struggling with their self-image after childbirth, our results can inform support services to address concerns.

波多黎各西班牙裔人口中阴道分娩、剖腹产和无阴道妇女对生殖器外观的自我认知。
目的:人们认为分娩既是美丽的,也是痛苦的。阴道分娩后,一些妇女会在社交媒体和/或网站上表达对自己生殖器外观的不满。本研究探讨了一些妇女在分娩后如何看待自己的生殖器。研究比较了三组妇女:阴道分娩妇女、剖腹产妇女和从未生育过的妇女:研究获得机构审查委员会批准后,224 名居住在波多黎各、年龄在 21 至 42 岁之间的女性参与者填写了关于生殖器自我形象的问卷:结果:约 51%(n=115)的参与者从未生育过;其他参与者中有 23%(n=51)通过剖腹产或 26%(n=58)通过阴道分娩。在所有 3 组中,84% 的人对自己的生殖器持肯定态度,79% 的人对自己生殖器的外观表示满意,84% 的人对自己生殖器的大小表示满意;81% 的人不为自己的生殖器感到羞耻:逻辑回归发现,不同分娩组或非极孕期妇女对生殖器的自我认知没有明显差异。不同分娩方式的产妇对生殖器正面形象的调整几率略有不同,但无统计学意义(阴道分娩为 0.65 至 1.11,剖腹产为 0.42 至 1.00;P>0.05)。这表明,分娩方式对妇女的生殖器自我认知没有显著影响。然而,对于 21% 有负面看法的妇女来说,有针对性的支持是至关重要的;对于那些在产后与自我形象作斗争的妇女来说,我们的结果可以为支持服务提供信息,以解决她们的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信