Airway Clearance Techniques in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: A Systematic Review.

Puerto Rico health sciences journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01
Liling Qian, Bonnie Lam, Tun Zheng, Daniela Russo, Jinhui Ma, Xiaomei Yao
{"title":"Airway Clearance Techniques in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Liling Qian, Bonnie Lam, Tun Zheng, Daniela Russo, Jinhui Ma, Xiaomei Yao","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a respiratory disorder that impairs mucociliary clearance, leading to decreased lung function. Conventional chest physiotherapy (CCP) is the traditional airway clearance technique (ACT) and is considered a standard treatment for PCD patients. This systematic review investigated whether device supported ACTs are better alternatives for improving lung function and/or quality of life in PCD, compared with CCP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The OVID Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to aggregate the data. This systematic review has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews website.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 389 citations that resulted from our literature search, 2 randomized crossover trials that included a total of 54 patients were analyzed. The certainty of the aggregated study evidence was very low. No difference was identified between device-supported ACTs and CCP in terms of forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 second in PCD patients aged 6 to 20 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Device-supported ACTs could be considered alternative treatment options to replace CCP. High quality research is required to confirm this result.</p>","PeriodicalId":94183,"journal":{"name":"Puerto Rico health sciences journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Puerto Rico health sciences journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a respiratory disorder that impairs mucociliary clearance, leading to decreased lung function. Conventional chest physiotherapy (CCP) is the traditional airway clearance technique (ACT) and is considered a standard treatment for PCD patients. This systematic review investigated whether device supported ACTs are better alternatives for improving lung function and/or quality of life in PCD, compared with CCP.

Methods: The OVID Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to aggregate the data. This systematic review has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews website.

Results: Of the 389 citations that resulted from our literature search, 2 randomized crossover trials that included a total of 54 patients were analyzed. The certainty of the aggregated study evidence was very low. No difference was identified between device-supported ACTs and CCP in terms of forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 second in PCD patients aged 6 to 20 years.

Conclusion: Device-supported ACTs could be considered alternative treatment options to replace CCP. High quality research is required to confirm this result.

原发性睫状肌运动障碍的气道清理技术:系统回顾
目的:原发性纤毛运动障碍(PCD)是一种呼吸系统疾病,会影响粘液纤毛的清除,导致肺功能下降。传统胸部物理治疗(CCP)是传统的气道清除技术(ACT),被认为是 PCD 患者的标准治疗方法。本系统综述调查了与 CCP 相比,设备支持的 ACT 是否是改善 PCD 患者肺功能和/或生活质量的更好替代方法:方法:检索了 OVID Medline、PubMed、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 数据库。方法:对 OVID Medline、PubMed、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 数据库进行了检索,遵循了系统综述和元分析首选报告项目指南,并采用了推荐、评估、发展和评价分级法来汇总数据。本系统综述已在系统综述国际前瞻性注册网站上注册:结果:在文献检索得出的 389 条引文中,我们分析了 2 项随机交叉试验,共纳入 54 名患者。综合研究证据的确定性很低。在 6 至 20 岁的 PCD 患者中,设备支持的 ACT 和 CCP 在 1 秒内的用力肺活量和用力呼气量方面没有发现差异:结论:设备支持的 ACT 可被视为替代 CCP 的替代治疗方案。需要进行高质量的研究来证实这一结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信