Monitoring the psychopathological profile of inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with biological agents: a pilot study.

IF 1.9 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Antonio M D'Onofrio, Lodovico M Balzoni, Gaspare F Ferrajoli, Federica DI Vincenzo, Daniele Napolitano, Elisa Schiavoni, Georgios D Kotzalidis, Alessio Simonetti, Marianna Mazza, Ilenia Rosa, Mauro Pettorruso, Gabriele Sani, Antonio Gasbarrini, Franco Scaldaferri, Giovanni Camardese
{"title":"Monitoring the psychopathological profile of inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with biological agents: a pilot study.","authors":"Antonio M D'Onofrio, Lodovico M Balzoni, Gaspare F Ferrajoli, Federica DI Vincenzo, Daniele Napolitano, Elisa Schiavoni, Georgios D Kotzalidis, Alessio Simonetti, Marianna Mazza, Ilenia Rosa, Mauro Pettorruso, Gabriele Sani, Antonio Gasbarrini, Franco Scaldaferri, Giovanni Camardese","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5985.24.03719-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biological agents were found to alter the psychopathological profile of a small subgroup of patients treated for a variety of conditions, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and psychiatric disorders. The association between the administration of biological agents and psychopathology needs to be further investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this naturalistic prospective cohort study, patients with IBD were assigned to two treatment groups, i.e., a biological agent (which also included tofacitinib) or conventional therapy. Clinician-administered scales were used to assess psychosomatic symptoms (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [Ham-D], Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [Ham-A], Young Mania Rating Scale [YMRS], and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale [BPRS]) and disease activity (Mayo Score and Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI]) at baseline, after one, three, and six months of treatment. Each group was assessed for the course of their scores during the observation period at each assessment point.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients on biological drugs who completed three months of treatment (N.=32) and six months of treatment (N.=20) scored significantly lower on the Mayo compared to baseline. Patients on conventional treatment obtained significant drops from baseline on the HBI after one and three months of treatment (N.=30) and also at the six-month endpoint (N.=11). Both groups showed no improvement or worsening on the psychiatric rating scales.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we found no evidence of psychiatric symptom worsening, as some literature would suggest. Our data suggest that the use of biological agents in IBD is safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":94142,"journal":{"name":"Minerva gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5985.24.03719-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biological agents were found to alter the psychopathological profile of a small subgroup of patients treated for a variety of conditions, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and psychiatric disorders. The association between the administration of biological agents and psychopathology needs to be further investigated.

Methods: In this naturalistic prospective cohort study, patients with IBD were assigned to two treatment groups, i.e., a biological agent (which also included tofacitinib) or conventional therapy. Clinician-administered scales were used to assess psychosomatic symptoms (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [Ham-D], Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [Ham-A], Young Mania Rating Scale [YMRS], and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale [BPRS]) and disease activity (Mayo Score and Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI]) at baseline, after one, three, and six months of treatment. Each group was assessed for the course of their scores during the observation period at each assessment point.

Results: Patients on biological drugs who completed three months of treatment (N.=32) and six months of treatment (N.=20) scored significantly lower on the Mayo compared to baseline. Patients on conventional treatment obtained significant drops from baseline on the HBI after one and three months of treatment (N.=30) and also at the six-month endpoint (N.=11). Both groups showed no improvement or worsening on the psychiatric rating scales.

Conclusions: In this study, we found no evidence of psychiatric symptom worsening, as some literature would suggest. Our data suggest that the use of biological agents in IBD is safe.

监测接受生物制剂治疗的炎症性肠病患者的心理病理特征:一项试点研究。
背景:研究发现,生物制剂可改变一小部分因各种疾病(包括炎症性肠病(IBD)和精神障碍)而接受治疗的患者的精神病理特征。施用生物制剂与精神病理学之间的关联有待进一步研究:在这项自然前瞻性队列研究中,IBD 患者被分配到两个治疗组,即生物制剂组(也包括托法替尼)或常规治疗组。在基线、治疗 1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月后,采用临床医师自制量表评估患者的心身症状(汉密尔顿抑郁评分量表 [Ham-D]、汉密尔顿焦虑评分量表 [Ham-A]、青年躁狂评分量表 [YMRS] 和简明精神病评分量表 [BPRS])和疾病活动性(梅奥评分和哈维-布拉德肖指数 [HBI])。在每个评估点,对每组患者在观察期内的评分情况进行评估:结果:与基线相比,完成三个月治疗(32 人)和六个月治疗(20 人)的生物药物患者的梅奥评分明显降低。接受常规治疗的患者在治疗 1 个月和 3 个月后(30 人)以及 6 个月终点时(11 人),其 HBI 与基线相比有明显下降。两组患者的精神评分量表均无改善或恶化:在这项研究中,我们没有发现精神症状恶化的证据,这与一些文献的观点不谋而合。我们的数据表明,在 IBD 中使用生物制剂是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信