Comparing Mental Strain and Subjective Sensations With and Without a Wearable Chair While Performing Simulated Suturing Tasks.

Abstract

Introduction Prolonged standing during surgery is a cause of musculoskeletal disorders in surgeons. Wearable chairs have reportedly reduced musculoskeletal strain effectively when used in industry. However, discomfort and instability issues may remain. This study examines whether using a wearable chair for surgical procedures imposes negative effects, such as mental or physical strain on surgeons prior to its clinical implementation. Methods This prospective cross-over study compared mental strain and subjective sensations in simulated suturing tasks with and without using Archelis®, a wearable chair (Archelis Inc, Yokohama, Japan). Six surgeons participated in the study. Mental strain was examined using heart rate variations calculated during tasks. Four subjective sensations (fatigue, comfort, balance, and workability) after each task and differences in body localized pain pre- and post-task were compared using a 10 centimetres (cm)-visual analog scale (VAS) score questionnaire. Results Results showed no significant differences in mental strain nor subjective sensations with or without the wearable chair. The mean VAS scores for all four subjective sensations with the wearable chair were relatively positive. There was a slight yet insignificant post-task increase in VAS mean scores for body-localized pain in the lower legs. Conclusions Significant negative effects on surgeons from the wearable chair were not observed during simulated suturing procedures. This demonstrates no major barriers in the initial phases of wearable chairs integration into the surgery environment.