Symptom Dimensions and Cognitive Impairments in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.

Tian Hong Zhang, Li Hua Xu, Yan Yan Wei, HuiRu Cui, Xiao Chen Tang, Ye Gang Hu, Hai Chun Liu, Zi Xuan Wang, Tao Chen, Zheng Hui Yi, Chun Bo Li, Ji Jun Wang
{"title":"Symptom Dimensions and Cognitive Impairments in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.","authors":"Tian Hong Zhang, Li Hua Xu, Yan Yan Wei, HuiRu Cui, Xiao Chen Tang, Ye Gang Hu, Hai Chun Liu, Zi Xuan Wang, Tao Chen, Zheng Hui Yi, Chun Bo Li, Ji Jun Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Understanding the intricate relationship between symptom dimensions, clusters, and cognitive impairments is crucial for early detection and intervention in individuals at clinical high-risk(CHR) for psychosis. This study delves into this complex interplay within a CHR sample and aims to predict the conversion to psychosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive cognitive assessment was performed among 744 CHR individuals. The study included a three-year follow-up period to assess conversion to psychosis. Symptom profiles were determined using the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes. By applying factor analysis, symptom dimensions were categorized as dominant negative symptoms(NS), positive symptoms-stressful(PS-S), and positive symptoms-odd(PS-O). The factor scores were used to define three dominant symptom groups. Latent class analysis(LCA) and factor mixture model(FMM) were employed to identify discrete clusters based on symptom patterns. The three-class solution was chosen for the LCA and FMM analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals in the dominant NS group exhibited significantly higher conversion rates to psychosis than those in the other groups. Specific cognitive variables, including performance in the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised(Odd ratio, OR=0.702, p=0.001) and Neuropsychological Assessment Battery mazes(OR=0.776, p=0.024), significantly predicted conversion to psychosis. Notably, cognitive impairments associated with NS and PS-S affected different cognitive domains. LCA- and FMM-Cluster 1, characterized by severe NS and PS-O, exhibited more impairments in cognitive domains than other clusters. No significant difference in the conversion rate was observed among LCA and FMM clusters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the importance of NS in the development of psychosis and suggest specific cognitive domains that are affected by symptom dimensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.09.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Understanding the intricate relationship between symptom dimensions, clusters, and cognitive impairments is crucial for early detection and intervention in individuals at clinical high-risk(CHR) for psychosis. This study delves into this complex interplay within a CHR sample and aims to predict the conversion to psychosis.

Methods: A comprehensive cognitive assessment was performed among 744 CHR individuals. The study included a three-year follow-up period to assess conversion to psychosis. Symptom profiles were determined using the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes. By applying factor analysis, symptom dimensions were categorized as dominant negative symptoms(NS), positive symptoms-stressful(PS-S), and positive symptoms-odd(PS-O). The factor scores were used to define three dominant symptom groups. Latent class analysis(LCA) and factor mixture model(FMM) were employed to identify discrete clusters based on symptom patterns. The three-class solution was chosen for the LCA and FMM analysis.

Results: Individuals in the dominant NS group exhibited significantly higher conversion rates to psychosis than those in the other groups. Specific cognitive variables, including performance in the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised(Odd ratio, OR=0.702, p=0.001) and Neuropsychological Assessment Battery mazes(OR=0.776, p=0.024), significantly predicted conversion to psychosis. Notably, cognitive impairments associated with NS and PS-S affected different cognitive domains. LCA- and FMM-Cluster 1, characterized by severe NS and PS-O, exhibited more impairments in cognitive domains than other clusters. No significant difference in the conversion rate was observed among LCA and FMM clusters.

Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of NS in the development of psychosis and suggest specific cognitive domains that are affected by symptom dimensions.

精神病临床高危人群的症状维度和认知障碍。
目的:了解症状维度、症状群和认知障碍之间错综复杂的关系,对于早期发现和干预精神病临床高危(CHR)人群至关重要。本研究深入探讨了临床高危人群样本中这种复杂的相互作用,并旨在预测其向精神病的转化:方法:对 744 名临床高危人群进行了全面的认知评估。研究包括为期三年的随访,以评估向精神病的转化情况。采用前驱综合征结构化访谈法确定症状特征。通过因子分析,症状维度被分为占主导地位的阴性症状(NS)、阳性症状-紧张(PS-S)和阳性症状-特殊(PS-O)。因子得分被用来定义三个主要症状组。采用潜类分析(LCA)和因子混合模型(FMM)来识别基于症状模式的离散群组。LCA 和 FMM 分析选择了三类解决方案:结果:NS显性组患者的精神病转化率明显高于其他组。特定的认知变量,包括简明视觉空间记忆测验(Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised)(奇数比,OR=0.702,P=0.001)和神经心理评估测试(Neuropsychological Assessment Battery mazes)(OR=0.776,P=0.024)中的表现,可显著预测向精神病的转化。值得注意的是,与 NS 和 PS-S 相关的认知障碍会影响不同的认知领域。以严重 NS 和 PS-O 为特征的 LCA-1 和 FMM-1 群组比其他群组在认知领域表现出更多的障碍。LCA和FMM群组之间的转换率没有明显差异:这些发现强调了 NS 在精神病发展过程中的重要性,并提出了受症状影响的特定认知领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信