TianHong Zhang , LiHua Xu , YanYan Wei , HuiRu Cui , XiaoChen Tang , YeGang Hu , HaiChun Liu , ZiXuan Wang , Tao Chen , ZhengHui Yi , ChunBo Li , JiJun Wang
{"title":"Symptom Dimensions and Cognitive Impairments in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis","authors":"TianHong Zhang , LiHua Xu , YanYan Wei , HuiRu Cui , XiaoChen Tang , YeGang Hu , HaiChun Liu , ZiXuan Wang , Tao Chen , ZhengHui Yi , ChunBo Li , JiJun Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Understanding the intricate relationships between symptom dimensions, clusters, and cognitive impairments is crucial for early detection and intervention in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis. This study delves into this complex interplay in a clinical high risk sample with the aim of predicting the conversion to psychosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive cognitive assessment was performed in 744 clinical high risk individuals. The study included a 3-year follow-up period to allow assessment of conversion to psychosis. Symptom profiles were determined using the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes. By applying factor analysis, symptom dimensions were categorized as dominant negative symptoms (NS), positive symptoms-stressful, and positive symptoms-odd. The factor scores were used to define 3 dominant symptom groups. Latent class analysis (LCA) and the factor mixture model (FMM) were employed to identify discrete clusters based on symptom patterns. The 3-class solution was chosen for the LCA and FMM analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Individuals in the dominant NS group exhibited significantly higher conversion rates to psychosis than those in the other groups. Specific cognitive variables, including performance on the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test–Revised (odds ratio = 0.702, <em>p</em> = .001) and Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Mazes Test (odds ratio = 0.776, <em>p</em> = .024), significantly predicted conversion to psychosis. Notably, cognitive impairments associated with NS and positive symptoms-stressful groups affected different cognitive domains. LCA and FMM cluster 1, which was characterized by severe NS and positive symptoms-odd, exhibited more impairments in cognitive domains than other clusters. No significant difference in the conversion rate was observed among the LCA and FMM clusters.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings highlight the importance of NS in the development of psychosis and suggest specific cognitive domains that are affected by symptom dimensions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54231,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","volume":"10 6","pages":"Pages 646-655"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451902224002702","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Understanding the intricate relationships between symptom dimensions, clusters, and cognitive impairments is crucial for early detection and intervention in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis. This study delves into this complex interplay in a clinical high risk sample with the aim of predicting the conversion to psychosis.
Methods
A comprehensive cognitive assessment was performed in 744 clinical high risk individuals. The study included a 3-year follow-up period to allow assessment of conversion to psychosis. Symptom profiles were determined using the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes. By applying factor analysis, symptom dimensions were categorized as dominant negative symptoms (NS), positive symptoms-stressful, and positive symptoms-odd. The factor scores were used to define 3 dominant symptom groups. Latent class analysis (LCA) and the factor mixture model (FMM) were employed to identify discrete clusters based on symptom patterns. The 3-class solution was chosen for the LCA and FMM analysis.
Results
Individuals in the dominant NS group exhibited significantly higher conversion rates to psychosis than those in the other groups. Specific cognitive variables, including performance on the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test–Revised (odds ratio = 0.702, p = .001) and Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Mazes Test (odds ratio = 0.776, p = .024), significantly predicted conversion to psychosis. Notably, cognitive impairments associated with NS and positive symptoms-stressful groups affected different cognitive domains. LCA and FMM cluster 1, which was characterized by severe NS and positive symptoms-odd, exhibited more impairments in cognitive domains than other clusters. No significant difference in the conversion rate was observed among the LCA and FMM clusters.
Conclusions
These findings highlight the importance of NS in the development of psychosis and suggest specific cognitive domains that are affected by symptom dimensions.
期刊介绍:
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging is an official journal of the Society for Biological Psychiatry, whose purpose is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in fields that investigate the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders of thought, emotion, or behavior. In accord with this mission, this peer-reviewed, rapid-publication, international journal focuses on studies using the tools and constructs of cognitive neuroscience, including the full range of non-invasive neuroimaging and human extra- and intracranial physiological recording methodologies. It publishes both basic and clinical studies, including those that incorporate genetic data, pharmacological challenges, and computational modeling approaches. The journal publishes novel results of original research which represent an important new lead or significant impact on the field. Reviews and commentaries that focus on topics of current research and interest are also encouraged.