Changes in muscle cross-sectional area during two menstrual cycles may not be exclusively attributed to resistance training.

Nathalia F Dias, João G A Bergamasco, Maíra C Scarpelli, Deivid G Silva, Talisson S Chaves, Diego Bittencourt, Ricardo A Medalha, Paulo C Carello Filho, Eduardo O De Souza, Carlos Ugrinowitsch, Cleiton A Libardi
{"title":"Changes in muscle cross-sectional area during two menstrual cycles may not be exclusively attributed to resistance training.","authors":"Nathalia F Dias, João G A Bergamasco, Maíra C Scarpelli, Deivid G Silva, Talisson S Chaves, Diego Bittencourt, Ricardo A Medalha, Paulo C Carello Filho, Eduardo O De Souza, Carlos Ugrinowitsch, Cleiton A Libardi","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2024-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the impact of menstrual cycle (MC) phases and resistance training (RT) on muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) in two MCs utilizing a within-subject design. Twenty women with regular MCs had their legs randomly allocated to either the control (CON) or RT condition, which included 16 training sessions over two MCs. CSA, estradiol (E2), and progesterone (P4) were assessed during the menstruation (M), ovulation (O), and luteal (L) phases in the first (M1, O1, L1) and second (M2, O2, L2) MCs and at the beginning of the third MC (M3). P4 values were significantly higher during the luteal phase than during menstruation (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) and ovulation (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). No significant differences in E2 concentrations were observed between the MC phases (<i>P</i> = 0.08). For the RT condition, the CSA showed significant increases at O2, L2, and M3 compared to baseline (M1) (all <i>P</i> < 0.0001). No significant changes were observed for the CON condition during the two MCs (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, RT condition showed a significant change in average CSA across two MCs. Additionally, individual analyses revealed that 19 participants showed variation in CSA above or below the minimum detectable difference during the two MCs. These findings suggest that changes in muscle CSA observed during two MCs may not be exclusively attributed to RT.</p>","PeriodicalId":93878,"journal":{"name":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2024-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of menstrual cycle (MC) phases and resistance training (RT) on muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) in two MCs utilizing a within-subject design. Twenty women with regular MCs had their legs randomly allocated to either the control (CON) or RT condition, which included 16 training sessions over two MCs. CSA, estradiol (E2), and progesterone (P4) were assessed during the menstruation (M), ovulation (O), and luteal (L) phases in the first (M1, O1, L1) and second (M2, O2, L2) MCs and at the beginning of the third MC (M3). P4 values were significantly higher during the luteal phase than during menstruation (P < 0.0001) and ovulation (P < 0.0001). No significant differences in E2 concentrations were observed between the MC phases (P = 0.08). For the RT condition, the CSA showed significant increases at O2, L2, and M3 compared to baseline (M1) (all P < 0.0001). No significant changes were observed for the CON condition during the two MCs (P > 0.05). However, RT condition showed a significant change in average CSA across two MCs. Additionally, individual analyses revealed that 19 participants showed variation in CSA above or below the minimum detectable difference during the two MCs. These findings suggest that changes in muscle CSA observed during two MCs may not be exclusively attributed to RT.

两个月经周期中肌肉横截面积的变化可能并不完全归因于阻力训练。
本研究采用受试者内设计,调查了月经周期(MC)阶段和阻力训练(RT)对两个 MC 肌肉横截面积(CSA)的影响。20 名有规律月经周期的女性被随机分配到对照组(CON)或阻力训练组(RT),其中包括在两个月经周期内进行 16 次训练。在第一次 MC(M1、O1、L1)和第二次 MC(M2、O2、L2)的月经期(M)、排卵期(O)和黄体期(L)以及第三次 MC(M3)开始时,对 CSA、雌二醇(E2)和孕酮(P4)进行评估。黄体期的 P4 值明显高于月经期(P < 0.0001)和排卵期(P < 0.0001)。各 MC 阶段的 E2 浓度无明显差异(P = 0.08)。在 RT 条件下,与基线(M1)相比,CSA 在 O2、L2 和 M3 显著增加(所有 P <0.0001)。CON 条件在两次 MC 期间未观察到明显变化(P > 0.05)。然而,RT 条件在两个 MC 中显示出平均 CSA 的显著变化。此外,个体分析显示,19 名参与者在两次 MC 中的 CSA 变化高于或低于最小可检测差异。这些研究结果表明,在两次 MC 中观察到的肌肉 CSA 变化可能并不完全归因于 RT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信