On-call simulation: Evaluating cost and impact

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1111/tct.13807
Rachel Scott, Samuel D. Chumbley, Maria Miles, Clodagh Beattie, Anive Grewal
{"title":"On-call simulation: Evaluating cost and impact","authors":"Rachel Scott,&nbsp;Samuel D. Chumbley,&nbsp;Maria Miles,&nbsp;Clodagh Beattie,&nbsp;Anive Grewal","doi":"10.1111/tct.13807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>On-call simulation has been shown to improve the confidence of prospective junior doctors in undertaking on-call shifts. Despite this, it is not mandated in UK medical school curricula, leading to variations in provision. Barriers to widespread implementation may include doubts surrounding effectiveness, feasibility of delivering on-call simulation across multiple sites and unknown costs. To address these gaps in the literature, we designed and implemented a multi-site on-call simulation programme. We aimed to evaluate it both educationally, using student preparedness to complete on-call shifts as our outcome, and economically, by performing a cost-outcome description.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>An on-call simulation programme, ‘Bleep 101’, was developed and implemented at eight hospitals. Students were ‘bleeped’ around a circuit of written scenarios including clinical emergencies, prescribing and distractor tasks. Students could escalate to their facilitator on the phone for advice at any time. Sessions concluded with a 30-minute debrief focusing on prioritisation and communication skills.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>Between 2018 and 2023, 217 students took part and completed feedback forms. Post-session feedback using Likert scales demonstrated a significant increase in preparedness to complete an on-call shift (pre-4/10, post-7/10, p &lt; 0.01) with outcomes consistent across sites. A cohort of 20 students completed paired pre- and post-session feedback to evaluate the impact of the session on specific skills. This demonstrated increased confidence in using a bleep, prioritisation, gathering information and handing over. The costs of implementation at one site were reported, demonstrating a cost of £1.99/student/year or £99.48/student/year excluding costs saved by volunteers and room hire.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>This study indicates that on-call simulation can be delivered at a low cost using existing medical education infrastructure within hospitals. Results suggested an improvement in medical students' preparedness for on-call practice. We therefore recommend on-call simulation be available to all medical students as part of medical school curricula.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"21 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.13807","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

On-call simulation has been shown to improve the confidence of prospective junior doctors in undertaking on-call shifts. Despite this, it is not mandated in UK medical school curricula, leading to variations in provision. Barriers to widespread implementation may include doubts surrounding effectiveness, feasibility of delivering on-call simulation across multiple sites and unknown costs. To address these gaps in the literature, we designed and implemented a multi-site on-call simulation programme. We aimed to evaluate it both educationally, using student preparedness to complete on-call shifts as our outcome, and economically, by performing a cost-outcome description.

Approach

An on-call simulation programme, ‘Bleep 101’, was developed and implemented at eight hospitals. Students were ‘bleeped’ around a circuit of written scenarios including clinical emergencies, prescribing and distractor tasks. Students could escalate to their facilitator on the phone for advice at any time. Sessions concluded with a 30-minute debrief focusing on prioritisation and communication skills.

Evaluation

Between 2018 and 2023, 217 students took part and completed feedback forms. Post-session feedback using Likert scales demonstrated a significant increase in preparedness to complete an on-call shift (pre-4/10, post-7/10, p < 0.01) with outcomes consistent across sites. A cohort of 20 students completed paired pre- and post-session feedback to evaluate the impact of the session on specific skills. This demonstrated increased confidence in using a bleep, prioritisation, gathering information and handing over. The costs of implementation at one site were reported, demonstrating a cost of £1.99/student/year or £99.48/student/year excluding costs saved by volunteers and room hire.

Implications

This study indicates that on-call simulation can be delivered at a low cost using existing medical education infrastructure within hospitals. Results suggested an improvement in medical students' preparedness for on-call practice. We therefore recommend on-call simulation be available to all medical students as part of medical school curricula.

Abstract Image

待命模拟:评估成本和影响。
背景:模拟值班已被证明可以提高未来初级医生对值班的信心。尽管如此,英国医学院的课程设置中并未强制要求进行随叫随到模拟教学,导致教学内容参差不齐。广泛实施的障碍可能包括对有效性的怀疑、在多个地点提供值班模拟的可行性以及未知的成本。为了填补这些文献空白,我们设计并实施了一项多站点随叫随到模拟计划。我们的目标是从教育和经济两个方面对该计划进行评估,前者以学生完成随叫随到轮班的准备程度作为评估结果,后者则通过成本-结果说明来进行评估:方法:我们在八家医院开发并实施了 "哔声 101 "值班模拟计划。学生们在包括临床紧急情况、处方和分心任务在内的一系列书面情景中 "哔哔"。学生可以随时通过电话向指导员寻求建议。课程结束时进行 30 分钟的汇报,重点关注优先次序和沟通技巧:在 2018 年至 2023 年期间,共有 217 名学生参加并填写了反馈表。使用李克特量表进行的会后反馈表明,学生完成值班轮班的准备程度显著提高(会前-4/10,会后-7/10,P 暗示):这项研究表明,可以利用医院现有的医学教育基础设施,以较低的成本提供值班模拟。研究结果表明,医学生对随叫随到实践的准备程度有所提高。因此,我们建议将随叫随到模拟教学作为医学院课程的一部分提供给所有医学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信