Using community collaboration to evaluate the cultural relevance of the Resilience Education Program.

Alexandra Barber, Katie Eklund, Madison Weist, Danya Soto, Sahian Cruz, Bri'Anna Collins, Lauren Knuckey
{"title":"Using community collaboration to evaluate the cultural relevance of the Resilience Education Program.","authors":"Alexandra Barber, Katie Eklund, Madison Weist, Danya Soto, Sahian Cruz, Bri'Anna Collins, Lauren Knuckey","doi":"10.1037/spq0000657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, greater focus has been paid to the mental health needs of children from minoritized racial backgrounds. The culturally specific needs of these children, however, are often not considered within standard mental health treatments for youth. Oriented in the ecological validity framework (Bernal et al., 1995) and the radical healing framework (French et al., 2020), this study examines the efficacy, feasibility, and social validity of a modified mental health intervention for Black youth by (a) implementing and evaluating the Resilience Education Program (REP) with a sample of Black youth and caregivers and (b) obtaining feedback on the existing intervention to evaluate its cultural relevance for Black youth and families. REP is a Tier 2 intervention for internalizing behaviors in students in Grades 4-8. A pilot study was implemented to evaluate the REP intervention with one group (<i>n</i> = 5) of Black students, obtaining feedback from caregivers, teachers, and mentors. The program's efficacy, feasibility, and social validity was evaluated following the intervention using paired <i>t</i>-test analysis. Then, a series of focus groups were conducted with check-in/check-out mentors, caregivers, and youth participants to obtain feedback on REP. Focus group data were analyzed using thematic analysis and nominal group technique procedures. Themes for improvement and suggestions for future research are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74763,"journal":{"name":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, greater focus has been paid to the mental health needs of children from minoritized racial backgrounds. The culturally specific needs of these children, however, are often not considered within standard mental health treatments for youth. Oriented in the ecological validity framework (Bernal et al., 1995) and the radical healing framework (French et al., 2020), this study examines the efficacy, feasibility, and social validity of a modified mental health intervention for Black youth by (a) implementing and evaluating the Resilience Education Program (REP) with a sample of Black youth and caregivers and (b) obtaining feedback on the existing intervention to evaluate its cultural relevance for Black youth and families. REP is a Tier 2 intervention for internalizing behaviors in students in Grades 4-8. A pilot study was implemented to evaluate the REP intervention with one group (n = 5) of Black students, obtaining feedback from caregivers, teachers, and mentors. The program's efficacy, feasibility, and social validity was evaluated following the intervention using paired t-test analysis. Then, a series of focus groups were conducted with check-in/check-out mentors, caregivers, and youth participants to obtain feedback on REP. Focus group data were analyzed using thematic analysis and nominal group technique procedures. Themes for improvement and suggestions for future research are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

利用社区合作评估复原力教育计划的文化相关性。
近年来,来自少数种族背景的儿童的心理健康需求得到了更多关注。然而,标准的青少年心理健康治疗往往没有考虑到这些儿童在文化上的特殊需求。本研究以生态有效性框架(Bernal 等人,1995 年)和激进治疗框架(French 等人,2020 年)为导向,通过(a)对黑人青少年和照顾者样本实施和评估复原力教育计划(REP),以及(b)获得对现有干预措施的反馈,以评估其对黑人青少年和家庭的文化相关性,从而研究针对黑人青少年的改良心理健康干预措施的有效性、可行性和社会有效性。REP 是针对 4-8 年级学生内化行为的二级干预措施。我们开展了一项试点研究,对一组黑人学生(n = 5)的 REP 干预措施进行评估,并从照顾者、教师和辅导员那里获得反馈。干预结束后,使用配对 t 检验分析法对该计划的有效性、可行性和社会有效性进行了评估。然后,与签到/签退辅导员、照顾者和青少年参与者进行了一系列焦点小组讨论,以获得对 REP 的反馈。焦点小组数据采用主题分析和名义小组技术程序进行分析。提供了需要改进的主题和对未来研究的建议。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信