Alicia E. Long DVM, Samuel Hurcombe BSc, BVSc, MS, DACVIM, DACVECC, Klaus Hopster DrMedVet, PhD, DACVAA
{"title":"Bioreactance noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in euvolemic adult horses subjected with 7.2% saline and 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) solution infusions","authors":"Alicia E. Long DVM, Samuel Hurcombe BSc, BVSc, MS, DACVIM, DACVECC, Klaus Hopster DrMedVet, PhD, DACVAA","doi":"10.1111/vec.13418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the ability of bioreactance noninvasive cardiac output (BR-NICO) with thermodilution cardiac output (TDCO) for the measurement of cardiac output (CO) in healthy adult horses receiving 2 different IV volume replacement solutions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective randomized crossover study from September to November 2021.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>University teaching hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Six university-owned adult horses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interventions</h3>\n \n <p>Horses were randomly assigned to receive 7.2% hypertonic saline solution (HSS) or 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) solution (HETA). BR-NICO and TDCO were measured simultaneously at baseline, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 90, and 120 minutes before fluid administration and again at the same times after starting a bolus infusion of IV volume replacers. All solutions were administered within 10 minutes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements and Main Results</h3>\n \n <p>BR-NICO and TDCO were strongly correlated (Pearson <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.93; <i>P </i>< 0.01). Regression analysis showed the relationship between TDCO and BR-NICO was BR-NICO = 0.48 × TDCO + 0.6. For the corrected BR-NICO values, the Bland–Altman agreement mean bias and lower/upper limits of agreement were −0.62 and −5.3 to 3.9 L/min, respectively. Lin's concordance (95% confidence interval) between methods was 0.894 (0.825–1.097). Compared with baseline, HSS increased the CO at 10 and 20 minutes (TDCO and BR-NICO). Compared with baseline, HETA decreased the CO at 10 and 20 minutes (TDCO and BR-NICO) and increased the CO at 90 (TDCO only) and 120 minutes (TDCO and BR-NICO).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>BR-NICO strongly agreed with TDCO in the measurement of CO in healthy unsedated adult horses. HSS administration significantly increased CO in the first 30 minutes, while HETA initially decreased CO at 10 minutes but increased CO to above baseline values by 90 minutes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","volume":"34 5","pages":"437-445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.13418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To compare the ability of bioreactance noninvasive cardiac output (BR-NICO) with thermodilution cardiac output (TDCO) for the measurement of cardiac output (CO) in healthy adult horses receiving 2 different IV volume replacement solutions.
Design
Prospective randomized crossover study from September to November 2021.
Setting
University teaching hospital.
Animals
Six university-owned adult horses.
Interventions
Horses were randomly assigned to receive 7.2% hypertonic saline solution (HSS) or 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) solution (HETA). BR-NICO and TDCO were measured simultaneously at baseline, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 90, and 120 minutes before fluid administration and again at the same times after starting a bolus infusion of IV volume replacers. All solutions were administered within 10 minutes.
Measurements and Main Results
BR-NICO and TDCO were strongly correlated (Pearson r2 = 0.93; P < 0.01). Regression analysis showed the relationship between TDCO and BR-NICO was BR-NICO = 0.48 × TDCO + 0.6. For the corrected BR-NICO values, the Bland–Altman agreement mean bias and lower/upper limits of agreement were −0.62 and −5.3 to 3.9 L/min, respectively. Lin's concordance (95% confidence interval) between methods was 0.894 (0.825–1.097). Compared with baseline, HSS increased the CO at 10 and 20 minutes (TDCO and BR-NICO). Compared with baseline, HETA decreased the CO at 10 and 20 minutes (TDCO and BR-NICO) and increased the CO at 90 (TDCO only) and 120 minutes (TDCO and BR-NICO).
Conclusions
BR-NICO strongly agreed with TDCO in the measurement of CO in healthy unsedated adult horses. HSS administration significantly increased CO in the first 30 minutes, while HETA initially decreased CO at 10 minutes but increased CO to above baseline values by 90 minutes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care’s primary aim is to advance the international clinical standard of care for emergency/critical care patients of all species. The journal’s content is relevant to specialist and non-specialist veterinarians practicing emergency/critical care medicine. The journal achieves it aims by publishing descriptions of unique presentation or management; retrospective and prospective evaluations of prognosis, novel diagnosis, or therapy; translational basic science studies with clinical relevance; in depth reviews of pertinent topics; topical news and letters; and regular themed issues.
The journal is the official publication of the Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, and the European College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. It is a bimonthly publication with international impact and adheres to currently accepted ethical standards.