Functional connectivity subtypes during a positive mood induction: Predicting clinical response in a randomized controlled trial of ketamine for treatment-resistant depression.

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Shabnam Hossein, Mary L Woody, Benjamin Panny, Crystal Spotts, Meredith L Wallace, Sanjay J Mathew, Robert H Howland, Rebecca B Price
{"title":"Functional connectivity subtypes during a positive mood induction: Predicting clinical response in a randomized controlled trial of ketamine for treatment-resistant depression.","authors":"Shabnam Hossein, Mary L Woody, Benjamin Panny, Crystal Spotts, Meredith L Wallace, Sanjay J Mathew, Robert H Howland, Rebecca B Price","doi":"10.1037/abn0000951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ketamine has shown promise in rapidly improving symptoms of depression and most notably treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, given the heterogeneity of TRD, biobehavioral markers of treatment response are necessary for the personalized prescription of intravenous ketamine. Heterogeneity in depression can be manifested in discrete patterns of functional connectivity (FC) in default mode, ventral affective, and cognitive control networks. This study employed a data-driven approach to parse FC during positive mood processing to characterize subgroups of patients with TRD prior to infusion and determine whether these connectivity-based subgroups could predict subsequent antidepressant response to ketamine compared to saline infusion. 152 adult patients with TRD completed a baseline assessment of FC during positive mood processing and were randomly assigned to either ketamine or saline infusion. The assessment utilized Subgroup-Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation to recover directed connectivity maps and applied Walktrap algorithm to determine data-driven subgroups. Depression severity was assessed pre- and 24-hr postinfusion. Two connectivity-based subgroups were identified: Subgroup A (<i>n</i> = 110) and Subgroup B (<i>n</i> = 42). We observed that treatment response was moderated by an infusion type by subgroup interaction (<i>p</i> = .040). For patients receiving ketamine, subgroup did not predict treatment response (β = -.326, <i>p</i> = .499). However, subgroup predicted response for saline patients. Subgroup B individuals, relative to A, were more likely to be saline responders at 24-hr postinfusion (β = -2.146, <i>p</i> = .007). Thus, while ketamine improved depressive symptoms uniformly across both subgroups, this heterogeneity was a predictor of placebo response. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ketamine has shown promise in rapidly improving symptoms of depression and most notably treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, given the heterogeneity of TRD, biobehavioral markers of treatment response are necessary for the personalized prescription of intravenous ketamine. Heterogeneity in depression can be manifested in discrete patterns of functional connectivity (FC) in default mode, ventral affective, and cognitive control networks. This study employed a data-driven approach to parse FC during positive mood processing to characterize subgroups of patients with TRD prior to infusion and determine whether these connectivity-based subgroups could predict subsequent antidepressant response to ketamine compared to saline infusion. 152 adult patients with TRD completed a baseline assessment of FC during positive mood processing and were randomly assigned to either ketamine or saline infusion. The assessment utilized Subgroup-Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation to recover directed connectivity maps and applied Walktrap algorithm to determine data-driven subgroups. Depression severity was assessed pre- and 24-hr postinfusion. Two connectivity-based subgroups were identified: Subgroup A (n = 110) and Subgroup B (n = 42). We observed that treatment response was moderated by an infusion type by subgroup interaction (p = .040). For patients receiving ketamine, subgroup did not predict treatment response (β = -.326, p = .499). However, subgroup predicted response for saline patients. Subgroup B individuals, relative to A, were more likely to be saline responders at 24-hr postinfusion (β = -2.146, p = .007). Thus, while ketamine improved depressive symptoms uniformly across both subgroups, this heterogeneity was a predictor of placebo response. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

积极情绪诱导过程中的功能连接亚型:预测氯胺酮治疗难治性抑郁症随机对照试验的临床反应。
氯胺酮有望迅速改善抑郁症状,尤其是耐药性抑郁症(TRD)。然而,鉴于TRD的异质性,治疗反应的生物行为标志物对于静脉注射氯胺酮的个性化处方是必要的。抑郁症的异质性可表现为默认模式、腹侧情感和认知控制网络中功能连接(FC)的离散模式。本研究采用了一种数据驱动的方法来解析积极情绪处理过程中的FC,从而在输注氯胺酮前确定TRD患者的亚组特征,并确定这些基于连接的亚组是否能预测氯胺酮与生理盐水输注相比的后续抗抑郁反应。152名成年TRD患者在积极情绪处理过程中完成了FC基线评估,并随机分配到氯胺酮或生理盐水输注。评估采用分组-分组迭代多重模型估计法恢复定向连接图,并应用Walktrap算法确定数据驱动的分组。抑郁严重程度在输液前和输液后 24 小时内进行评估。确定了两个基于连通性的亚组:子组 A(n = 110)和子组 B(n = 42)。我们观察到,治疗反应受输注类型与亚组交互作用的调节(p = .040)。对于接受氯胺酮治疗的患者,亚组并不能预测治疗反应(β = -.326,p = .499)。然而,亚组对生理盐水患者的反应有预测作用。相对于 A 组,B 组患者在输液后 24 小时更有可能对生理盐水产生反应(β = -2.146,p = .007)。因此,虽然氯胺酮对两个亚组的抑郁症状均有改善,但这种异质性是安慰剂反应的一个预测因素。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信