Acceptability of digital health technologies in early Parkinson's disease: lessons from WATCH-PD.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2024-08-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1435693
T Kangarloo, R D Latzman, J L Adams, R Dorsey, M Kostrzebski, J Severson, D Anderson, F Horak, D Stephenson, J Cosman
{"title":"Acceptability of digital health technologies in early Parkinson's disease: lessons from WATCH-PD.","authors":"T Kangarloo, R D Latzman, J L Adams, R Dorsey, M Kostrzebski, J Severson, D Anderson, F Horak, D Stephenson, J Cosman","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2024.1435693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Digital health technologies (DHTs) have the potential to alleviate challenges experienced in clinical trials through more objective, naturalistic, and frequent assessments of functioning. However, implementation of DHTs come with their own challenges, including acceptability and ease of use for study participants. In addition to acceptability, it is also important to understand device proficiency in the general population and within patient populations who may be asked to use DHTs for extended periods of time. We thus aimed to provide an overview of participant feedback on acceptability of DHTs, including body-worn sensors used in the clinic and a mobile application used at-home, used throughout the duration of the Wearable Assessments in the Clinic and at Home in Parkinson's Disease (WATCH-PD) study, an observational, longitudinal study looking at disease progression in early Parkinson's Disease (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>82 participants with PD and 50 control participants were enrolled at 17 sites throughout the United States and followed for 12 months. We assessed participants' general device proficiency at baseline, using the Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire (MDPQ). The mean MDPQ score at Baseline did not significantly differ between PD patients and healthy controls (20.6 [2.91] vs 21.5 [2.94], <i>p</i> = .10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaire results demonstrated that participants had generally positive views on the comfort and use of the digital technologies throughout the duration of the study, regardless of group.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This is the first study to evaluate patient feedback and impressions of using technology in a longitudinal observational study in early Parkinson's Disease. Results demonstrate device proficiency and acceptability of various DHTs in people with Parkinson's does not differ from that of neurologically healthy older adults, and, overall, participants had a favorable view of the DHTs deployed in the WATCH-PD study.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11381495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1435693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Digital health technologies (DHTs) have the potential to alleviate challenges experienced in clinical trials through more objective, naturalistic, and frequent assessments of functioning. However, implementation of DHTs come with their own challenges, including acceptability and ease of use for study participants. In addition to acceptability, it is also important to understand device proficiency in the general population and within patient populations who may be asked to use DHTs for extended periods of time. We thus aimed to provide an overview of participant feedback on acceptability of DHTs, including body-worn sensors used in the clinic and a mobile application used at-home, used throughout the duration of the Wearable Assessments in the Clinic and at Home in Parkinson's Disease (WATCH-PD) study, an observational, longitudinal study looking at disease progression in early Parkinson's Disease (PD).

Methods: 82 participants with PD and 50 control participants were enrolled at 17 sites throughout the United States and followed for 12 months. We assessed participants' general device proficiency at baseline, using the Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire (MDPQ). The mean MDPQ score at Baseline did not significantly differ between PD patients and healthy controls (20.6 [2.91] vs 21.5 [2.94], p = .10).

Results: Questionnaire results demonstrated that participants had generally positive views on the comfort and use of the digital technologies throughout the duration of the study, regardless of group.

Discussion: This is the first study to evaluate patient feedback and impressions of using technology in a longitudinal observational study in early Parkinson's Disease. Results demonstrate device proficiency and acceptability of various DHTs in people with Parkinson's does not differ from that of neurologically healthy older adults, and, overall, participants had a favorable view of the DHTs deployed in the WATCH-PD study.

早期帕金森病患者对数字医疗技术的接受程度:从 WATCH-PD 中汲取的经验教训。
引言数字健康技术(DHT)通过更客观、更自然、更频繁的功能评估,有可能减轻临床试验中遇到的挑战。然而,数字健康技术的实施也有其自身的挑战,包括研究参与者的可接受性和易用性。除了可接受性,了解普通人群和可能被要求长期使用 DHT 的患者群体对设备的熟练程度也很重要。因此,我们旨在概述参与者对 DHT 可接受性的反馈意见,包括在诊所使用的体戴式传感器和在家中使用的移动应用程序,这些设备在帕金森病诊所和家中可穿戴式评估(WATCH-PD)研究的整个过程中都在使用,该研究是一项观察早期帕金森病(PD)疾病进展的观察性纵向研究。我们使用移动设备熟练程度问卷(MDPQ)对参与者的一般设备熟练程度进行了基线评估。基线时的 MDPQ 平均得分在帕金森病患者和健康对照组之间没有明显差异(20.6 [2.91] vs 21.5 [2.94],P = .10):问卷调查结果显示,在整个研究过程中,无论哪个组别,参与者对数字技术的舒适度和使用情况普遍持积极态度:讨论:这是第一项在早期帕金森病的纵向观察研究中评估患者对使用技术的反馈和印象的研究。研究结果表明,帕金森病患者使用各种 DHT 的设备熟练程度和可接受性与神经系统健康的老年人并无不同,而且总体而言,参与者对 WATCH-PD 研究中使用的 DHT 持有好感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信